Auricular acupressure for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yufang Zou, Hongfang Xu
{"title":"Auricular acupressure for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis","authors":"Yufang Zou,&nbsp;Hongfang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Chronic kidney disease is a condition with high morbidity and mortality, and long-term renal replacement therapy also increases the risks of intradialytic hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of auricular acupressure in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension, regarding hypertension and reduction of complications of hemodialysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three English and four Chinese databases were searched until September 21st, 2022. Inclusion criteria were auricular acupressure as the only complementary adjuvant in the experimental group and control intervention of blank control. Primary outcomes included systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. Risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The review and meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane systematic review method, and trial sequential analyses were performed using TSA 0.9. Meta-influence analyses, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and evaluation of publication bias were performed to explore the heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE-pro GDT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 17 trials involving 1,288 participants were included. The results showed that auricular acupressure, as a complementary intervention, yielded significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (WMD 10.84 mmHg, 95 %CI:9.37–12.32, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>=33 %, low certainty), diastolic blood pressure (WMD 8.20 mmHg, 95 %CI:6.36–10.04, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>=57 %, very low certainty), and mean arterial pressure (WMD 7.87 mmHg, 95 %CI:5.00–10.74, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 0 %, very low certainty) when performed with conventional interventions compared with conventional interventions alone. Results also revealed better relief from hemodialysis complications in the experimental group, including arrhythmias (RR 0.27, 95 %CI:0.16–0.45, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>=0 %, very low certainty), heart failure (RR 0.38, 95 %CI:0.25–0.59, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 0 %, very low certainty), nausea and dizziness (RR 0.51, 95 %CI:0.33–0.77, <em>P</em> = 0.001, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 0 %, very low certainty), and dizziness alone (RR 0.16, 95 %CI:0.05–0.50, <em>P</em> = 0.002, <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 0 %, low certainty).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In general, auricular acupressure is safe and efficacious in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension, considering reduction in blood pressure and hemodialysis-induced complications. However, limitations of this review include risk of bias (including publication bias) in included studies, and a need for more inclusive studies with longer intervention and follow-up periods, and better global representation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease is a condition with high morbidity and mortality, and long-term renal replacement therapy also increases the risks of intradialytic hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of auricular acupressure in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension, regarding hypertension and reduction of complications of hemodialysis.

Methods

Three English and four Chinese databases were searched until September 21st, 2022. Inclusion criteria were auricular acupressure as the only complementary adjuvant in the experimental group and control intervention of blank control. Primary outcomes included systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. Risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The review and meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane systematic review method, and trial sequential analyses were performed using TSA 0.9. Meta-influence analyses, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and evaluation of publication bias were performed to explore the heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE-pro GDT.

Results

A total of 17 trials involving 1,288 participants were included. The results showed that auricular acupressure, as a complementary intervention, yielded significantly (p < 0.05) greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (WMD 10.84 mmHg, 95 %CI:9.37–12.32, P < 0.001, I2=33 %, low certainty), diastolic blood pressure (WMD 8.20 mmHg, 95 %CI:6.36–10.04, P < 0.001, I2=57 %, very low certainty), and mean arterial pressure (WMD 7.87 mmHg, 95 %CI:5.00–10.74, P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %, very low certainty) when performed with conventional interventions compared with conventional interventions alone. Results also revealed better relief from hemodialysis complications in the experimental group, including arrhythmias (RR 0.27, 95 %CI:0.16–0.45, P < 0.001, I2=0 %, very low certainty), heart failure (RR 0.38, 95 %CI:0.25–0.59, P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %, very low certainty), nausea and dizziness (RR 0.51, 95 %CI:0.33–0.77, P = 0.001, I2 = 0 %, very low certainty), and dizziness alone (RR 0.16, 95 %CI:0.05–0.50, P = 0.002, I2 = 0 %, low certainty).

Conclusion

In general, auricular acupressure is safe and efficacious in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intradialytic hypertension, considering reduction in blood pressure and hemodialysis-induced complications. However, limitations of this review include risk of bias (including publication bias) in included studies, and a need for more inclusive studies with longer intervention and follow-up periods, and better global representation.

对接受椎管内高血压治疗的慢性肾病患者进行耳穴按摩:系统综述和元分析与试验序列分析
简介:慢性肾脏病是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的疾病,长期肾脏替代治疗也增加了肾内高血压的风险。我们旨在评估耳穴穴位按摩对接受血液透析内高血压治疗的慢性肾脏病患者在高血压和减少血液透析并发症方面的疗效和安全性。纳入标准为实验组和空白对照组的对照干预中耳穴按摩是唯一的辅助治疗手段。主要结果包括收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压。采用科克伦偏倚风险工具对纳入试验的偏倚风险进行了评估。采用 Cochrane 系统综述方法进行综述和荟萃分析,并使用 TSA 0.9 进行试验序列分析。为探讨异质性,还进行了元影响分析、亚组分析、元回归和发表偏倚评估。采用 GRADE-pro GDT 对证据的确定性进行了评估。结果显示,耳穴按摩作为一种辅助干预措施,能显著降低收缩压(WMD 10.84 mmHg, 95 %CI:9.37-12.32, P < 0.001, I2=33 %, 低确定性)、舒张压(WMD 8.20毫米汞柱,95%CI:6.36-10.04,P <0.001,I2=57 %,确定性极低)和平均动脉压(WMD 7.87毫米汞柱,95%CI:5.00-10.74,P <0.001,I2=0 %,确定性极低)。结果还显示,实验组对血液透析并发症的缓解效果更好,包括心律失常(RR 0.27,95 %CI:0.16-0.45,P < 0.001,I2 = 0 %,确定性极低)、心力衰竭(RR 0.38,95 %CI:0.25-0.59,P < 0.001,I2 = 0 %,确定性极低)、恶心和头晕(RR 0.51,95 %CI:0.33-0.77,P = 0.001, I2 = 0 %, 很低的确定性),以及单纯头晕(RR 0.16, 95 %CI:0.05-0.50, P = 0.002, I2 = 0 %, 很低的确定性)。结论总的来说,考虑到降低血压和血液透析引起的并发症,耳穴按摩对接受肾内高血压治疗的慢性肾病患者是安全有效的。然而,本综述的局限性包括所纳入研究的偏倚风险(包括发表偏倚),以及需要纳入更多干预和随访时间更长、更具全球代表性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信