Knowledge and Utilization of Post-Abortion Care Services among Women of Reproductive Age in Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt Nigeria

Nyode Fortune Barile, C. Onyema, Oparanma Florence Uche, Amachree Damiete Maxwell
{"title":"Knowledge and Utilization of Post-Abortion Care Services among Women of Reproductive Age in Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt Nigeria","authors":"Nyode Fortune Barile, C. Onyema, Oparanma Florence Uche, Amachree Damiete Maxwell","doi":"10.54117/ijph.v4i1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed the knowledge and utilization of post abortion care services among women of reproductive age (15–49years) in Rivers State University Teaching Hospital. It was designed to determine women’s understanding of post-abortion care, the extent to which women use post abortion care services and identify reasons for non-use of post abortion care services among women of reproductive age. A simple sampling technique involving purposive sampling was used to randomly elicit 114 respondents. Data were collected with the aid of a structured questionnaire and analysed using frequency, means, percentages and regression analysis. The result showed that the respondents had an average age of 28years, 2 times deliveries and one abortion/miscarriage done averagely on the 11th-12th week. 50% were married, 43% were single, 91.2% were Christians and 74.6% have attended higher institution. The results showed the respondents had good understanding of post-abortion care. About 63.2% of the women were currently preventing pregnancy by regularly using barrier method e.g., Condom (1st in ranking/usage), Injectable (2nd), Pills (3rd) and Natural method (4th). The results also showed that the health facility’s distance (farness) from home, the cost of obtaining post abortion care services in the health facility, fear that some post abortion care services such as family planning injections can cause infertility, and healthcare providers’ attitude were the reasons for non-use of post-abortion care. The multinomial logistic regression analysis showed a highly significant difference of the effect of education on women’s knowledge of post-abortion care. The result of the multiple regression analysis however, showed no significant difference of the effect of occupation on the use of post-abortion care services. The study recommended that awareness programs on sex education/family planning and post-abortion care among women should be intensified.","PeriodicalId":447385,"journal":{"name":"IPS Journal of Public Health","volume":"204 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPS Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54117/ijph.v4i1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study assessed the knowledge and utilization of post abortion care services among women of reproductive age (15–49years) in Rivers State University Teaching Hospital. It was designed to determine women’s understanding of post-abortion care, the extent to which women use post abortion care services and identify reasons for non-use of post abortion care services among women of reproductive age. A simple sampling technique involving purposive sampling was used to randomly elicit 114 respondents. Data were collected with the aid of a structured questionnaire and analysed using frequency, means, percentages and regression analysis. The result showed that the respondents had an average age of 28years, 2 times deliveries and one abortion/miscarriage done averagely on the 11th-12th week. 50% were married, 43% were single, 91.2% were Christians and 74.6% have attended higher institution. The results showed the respondents had good understanding of post-abortion care. About 63.2% of the women were currently preventing pregnancy by regularly using barrier method e.g., Condom (1st in ranking/usage), Injectable (2nd), Pills (3rd) and Natural method (4th). The results also showed that the health facility’s distance (farness) from home, the cost of obtaining post abortion care services in the health facility, fear that some post abortion care services such as family planning injections can cause infertility, and healthcare providers’ attitude were the reasons for non-use of post-abortion care. The multinomial logistic regression analysis showed a highly significant difference of the effect of education on women’s knowledge of post-abortion care. The result of the multiple regression analysis however, showed no significant difference of the effect of occupation on the use of post-abortion care services. The study recommended that awareness programs on sex education/family planning and post-abortion care among women should be intensified.
尼日利亚哈科特港河流州立大学教学医院育龄妇女对人工流产后护理服务的了解和利用情况
这项研究评估了河流州立大学教学医院育龄妇女(15-49 岁)对流产后护理服务的了解和利用情况。研究旨在确定妇女对流产后护理的理解、妇女使用流产后护理服务的程度以及育龄妇女不使用流产后护理服务的原因。采用了简单的目的性抽样技术,随机抽取了 114 名受访者。通过结构化问卷收集数据,并使用频率、平均值、百分比和回归分析进行分析。结果显示,受访者的平均年龄为 28 岁,2 次分娩,1 次人工流产/流产,平均在第 11-12 周进行。50%已婚,43%单身,91.2%信奉基督教,74.6%曾就读于高等院校。调查结果显示,受访者对流产后护理有很好的了解。约 63.2%的妇女目前通过定期使用屏障法避孕,如避孕套(排名/使用率第一)、注射法(第 二)、避孕药(第三)和自然避孕法(第四)。结果还显示,医疗机构离家的距离(远近)、在医疗机构获得流产后护理服务的费用、担心某些流产后护理服务(如计划生育注射)会导致不孕以及医疗服务提供者的态度是不使用流产后护理的原因。多项式逻辑回归分析表明,教育程度对妇女流产后保健知识的影响存在非常显著的差异。然而,多元回归分析结果显示,职业对使用人工流产后护理服务的影响没有显著差异。研究建议,应在妇女中加强有关性教育/计划生育和堕胎后护理的宣传计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信