On the Question of the Beginning of Slavophilism: A.S. Khomyakov’s Article “About the Old and the New”

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Andrei Popov
{"title":"On the Question of the Beginning of Slavophilism: A.S. Khomyakov’s Article “About the Old and the New”","authors":"Andrei Popov","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-146-154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the question of the initial stage of the history of Slavophi­lism. Based on the contents of the letter by E.A. Khomyakova, found in 2000, it is concluded that the first handwritten article by A.S. Khomyakov “On the old and the New” was written in early 1837. This finding is the basis for the revision of ex­isting ideas that the Slavophile doctrine originated in the winter of 1839. Accord­ing to the author, this article by Khomyakov was a response to N.M. Karamzin’s note “On ancient and New Russia in its political and civil relations”. A compara­tive analysis of the main provisions of the content of these works is carried out. Karamzin’s views, according to the author, corresponded to conservative tradition­alism, which calls for the preservation of the existing order. Khomyakov’s ideo­logy corresponds to the archaic traditionalism that arises during periods of histori­cal development, when the attractive features of the social structure have been lost and one can only hope for their possible revival. The archaic proponent under­stands that it is no longer possible to revive the past in its entirety. His ideal is forced to adapt to the conditions of modern society. The article considers the reply message of I.V. Kireevsky “In response to Khomyakov”, which was written in the winter of 1839. The question of the general and special in the views of A.S. Khomyakov and I.V. Kireevsky is analyzed on the basis of the content of their first articles. According to the author of the article, criticism of the official ideology was one of the ideological sources of the formation of the Slavophile doctrine.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-146-154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the question of the initial stage of the history of Slavophi­lism. Based on the contents of the letter by E.A. Khomyakova, found in 2000, it is concluded that the first handwritten article by A.S. Khomyakov “On the old and the New” was written in early 1837. This finding is the basis for the revision of ex­isting ideas that the Slavophile doctrine originated in the winter of 1839. Accord­ing to the author, this article by Khomyakov was a response to N.M. Karamzin’s note “On ancient and New Russia in its political and civil relations”. A compara­tive analysis of the main provisions of the content of these works is carried out. Karamzin’s views, according to the author, corresponded to conservative tradition­alism, which calls for the preservation of the existing order. Khomyakov’s ideo­logy corresponds to the archaic traditionalism that arises during periods of histori­cal development, when the attractive features of the social structure have been lost and one can only hope for their possible revival. The archaic proponent under­stands that it is no longer possible to revive the past in its entirety. His ideal is forced to adapt to the conditions of modern society. The article considers the reply message of I.V. Kireevsky “In response to Khomyakov”, which was written in the winter of 1839. The question of the general and special in the views of A.S. Khomyakov and I.V. Kireevsky is analyzed on the basis of the content of their first articles. According to the author of the article, criticism of the official ideology was one of the ideological sources of the formation of the Slavophile doctrine.
关于斯拉夫嗜好主义的开端问题:A.S.霍米亚科夫的文章 "关于新旧"
这篇文章论述了斯拉夫史的初始阶段问题。根据 2000 年发现的 E.A.霍米亚科娃信件的内容,可以断定 A.S.霍米亚科夫的第一篇手写文章《论新旧》写于 1837 年初。这一发现是对斯拉夫派学说起源于 1839 年冬这一现有观点进行修正的依据。根据作者的说法,霍米亚科夫的这篇文章是对 N.M. Karamzin 的说明 "论政治和民事关系中的古俄罗斯和新俄罗斯 "的回应。作者对这两部著作的主要内容进行了比较分析。作者认为,卡拉姆钦的观点属于保守传统主义,要求维护现有秩序。霍米亚科夫的意识形态与古板的传统主义相对应,这种传统主义产生于历史发展时期,此时社会结构的诱人特征已经丧失,人们只能寄希望于它们可能的复兴。古板的拥护者明白,要完全恢复过去已不再可能。他的理想不得不适应现代社会的条件。文章探讨了伊-瓦-基列耶夫斯基写于 1839 年冬的《给霍米亚科夫的回信》。文章根据 A.S.霍米亚科夫和 I.V.基列耶夫斯基第一篇文章的内容分析了他们观点中的普遍性和特殊性问题。文章作者认为,对官方意识形态的批判是斯拉夫派学说形成的思想源泉之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信