Reminiscence respecified: A conversation analytic examination of practice in a specialist dementia care home

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Felicity Slocombe , Elizabeth Peel , Alison Pilnick , Saul Albert
{"title":"Reminiscence respecified: A conversation analytic examination of practice in a specialist dementia care home","authors":"Felicity Slocombe ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Peel ,&nbsp;Alison Pilnick ,&nbsp;Saul Albert","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although discussion of reminiscence is prevalent in dementia care research, few studies have examined what actually occurs in these interactions, and how they are structured. This study examined how reminiscence activities are structured and negotiated in a care home environment. Informal one-to-one reminiscence interactions between people living with dementia and professional carers were transcribed from a larger video dataset. We used Conversation Analysis to examine reminiscence sequences in a novel relational approach that explored the interactional practices used by carers and people living with dementia. We identified divergences between manualised practice recommendations and observed interactional practices, such as the rarity of open questions, and frequent use of closed questions. This was contrary to current practice recommendations. These and other divergences demonstrate the value of interactional research in informing reminiscence practice and training manuals. By examining how reminiscence operates in practice, our approaches to conducting such activities can be more empirically informed. Our findings can be used to advise and guide those doing reminiscence work in care home settings, and improve the inclusiveness of reminiscence interactions. Through incorporating empirically informed techniques that both carers and people with dementia use in practice, we can facilitate interactions around memories which are supportive of people with dementia's identity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000714/pdfft?md5=9a5493cd5744a8fbe6557b445ee568f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000714-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although discussion of reminiscence is prevalent in dementia care research, few studies have examined what actually occurs in these interactions, and how they are structured. This study examined how reminiscence activities are structured and negotiated in a care home environment. Informal one-to-one reminiscence interactions between people living with dementia and professional carers were transcribed from a larger video dataset. We used Conversation Analysis to examine reminiscence sequences in a novel relational approach that explored the interactional practices used by carers and people living with dementia. We identified divergences between manualised practice recommendations and observed interactional practices, such as the rarity of open questions, and frequent use of closed questions. This was contrary to current practice recommendations. These and other divergences demonstrate the value of interactional research in informing reminiscence practice and training manuals. By examining how reminiscence operates in practice, our approaches to conducting such activities can be more empirically informed. Our findings can be used to advise and guide those doing reminiscence work in care home settings, and improve the inclusiveness of reminiscence interactions. Through incorporating empirically informed techniques that both carers and people with dementia use in practice, we can facilitate interactions around memories which are supportive of people with dementia's identity.

重新诠释回忆:以对话分析法研究痴呆症专业护理院的做法
尽管在痴呆症护理研究中对回忆的讨论非常普遍,但很少有研究对这些互动中实际发生的情况以及它们是如何组织的进行了研究。本研究探讨了在护理之家环境中如何组织和协商回忆活动。我们从一个较大的视频数据集中转录了痴呆症患者和专业护理人员之间一对一的非正式回忆互动。我们采用对话分析法,以一种新颖的关系式方法研究回忆序列,探索照护者和痴呆症患者之间的互动实践。我们发现了手册中的实践建议与观察到的互动实践之间存在差异,例如很少使用开放式问题,而经常使用封闭式问题。这与当前的实践建议背道而驰。这些差异和其他差异表明了互动研究在为回忆实践和培训手册提供信息方面的价值。通过研究回忆在实践中是如何运作的,我们开展这类活动的方法就能更有实证依据。我们的研究结果可以为在护理之家环境中开展回忆工作的人员提供建议和指导,并提高回忆互动的包容性。通过融入护理人员和痴呆症患者在实践中都会使用的经验技巧,我们可以促进围绕回忆的互动,从而支持痴呆症患者的身份认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信