Declined intrinsic capacity predicts long-term mortality in Chinese older adults: Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yiming Pan , Xiaxia Li , Li Zhang , Yun Li , Zhe Tang , Lina Ma
{"title":"Declined intrinsic capacity predicts long-term mortality in Chinese older adults: Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging","authors":"Yiming Pan ,&nbsp;Xiaxia Li ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Yun Li ,&nbsp;Zhe Tang ,&nbsp;Lina Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intrinsic capacity reflects an individual's functions and capacities across their lifetime. There are few studies on whether the level of intrinsic capacity can predict long-term mortality in Chinese populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the effects of intrinsic capacity on long-term outcomes in older Chinese adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging. Overall, 1699 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years were included and followed up for 8 years. Intrinsic capacity was determined according to the World Health Organization definition. The predictive ability for adverse outcomes was assessed using the age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A decline in intrinsic capacity domains was observed in 729 (42.9 %) participants. Declines in the mobility, cognition, vitality, sensory and psychology domains were observed in 21.8 %, 15.1 %, 11.4 %, 9.10 %, and 14.2 % of the participants, respectively. Low intrinsic capacity was associated with worse physical performance, frailty, social frailty, chronic diseases, fracture, and falls. A greater decline in intrinsic capacity predicted an elevated 8-year mortality rate (decline in overall intrinsic capacity hazard ratio 2.91, 95 % confidence interval 2.44–3.47, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; decline in one domain hazard ratio 2.11, 95 % confidence interval 1.71–2.61, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; decline in two domains hazard ratio 3.54, 95 % confidence interval 2.81–4.45, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; decline in three or more domains hazard ratio 5.30, 95 % confidence interval 4.09–6.87, P &lt; 0.001); adjusted models did not affect prediction performance. Among the five domains of intrinsic capacity, cognition was the strongest predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 3.17, 95 % confidence interval 2.63–3.81, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intrinsic capacity is useful in identifying older adults at higher risk of adverse outcomes, presenting significant implications for healthcare policies in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224001774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intrinsic capacity reflects an individual's functions and capacities across their lifetime. There are few studies on whether the level of intrinsic capacity can predict long-term mortality in Chinese populations.

Objective

To explore the effects of intrinsic capacity on long-term outcomes in older Chinese adults.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging. Overall, 1699 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years were included and followed up for 8 years. Intrinsic capacity was determined according to the World Health Organization definition. The predictive ability for adverse outcomes was assessed using the age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A decline in intrinsic capacity domains was observed in 729 (42.9 %) participants. Declines in the mobility, cognition, vitality, sensory and psychology domains were observed in 21.8 %, 15.1 %, 11.4 %, 9.10 %, and 14.2 % of the participants, respectively. Low intrinsic capacity was associated with worse physical performance, frailty, social frailty, chronic diseases, fracture, and falls. A greater decline in intrinsic capacity predicted an elevated 8-year mortality rate (decline in overall intrinsic capacity hazard ratio 2.91, 95 % confidence interval 2.44–3.47, P < 0.001; decline in one domain hazard ratio 2.11, 95 % confidence interval 1.71–2.61, P < 0.001; decline in two domains hazard ratio 3.54, 95 % confidence interval 2.81–4.45, P < 0.001; decline in three or more domains hazard ratio 5.30, 95 % confidence interval 4.09–6.87, P < 0.001); adjusted models did not affect prediction performance. Among the five domains of intrinsic capacity, cognition was the strongest predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 3.17, 95 % confidence interval 2.63–3.81, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intrinsic capacity is useful in identifying older adults at higher risk of adverse outcomes, presenting significant implications for healthcare policies in China.

内在能力下降可预测中国老年人的长期死亡率北京老龄化纵向研究
背景内在能力反映了一个人一生中的功能和能力。关于内在能力水平能否预测中国人群的长期死亡率的研究很少。共纳入了 1699 名年龄≥60 岁的社区老年人,并对其进行了为期 8 年的随访。内在能力根据世界卫生组织的定义确定。采用年龄和性别调整后的 Cox 比例危险模型对不良后果的预测能力进行了评估。分别有 21.8%、15.1%、11.4%、9.10% 和 14.2% 的参与者在活动能力、认知能力、活力、感官能力和心理能力方面出现下降。内在能力低下与体能下降、虚弱、社交脆弱、慢性疾病、骨折和跌倒有关。内在能力下降越多,8 年死亡率越高(总体内在能力下降危险比为 2.91,95% 置信区间为 2.44-3.47,P < 0.001;一个领域下降危险比为 2.11,95% 置信区间为 1.71-2.61,P < 0.001)。61,P <0.001;两个领域下降的危险比为 3.54,95 % 置信区间为 2.81-4.45,P <0.001;三个或更多领域下降的危险比为 5.30,95 % 置信区间为 4.09-6.87,P <0.001);调整后的模型不影响预测结果。结论内在能力有助于识别不良后果风险较高的老年人,对中国的医疗保健政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信