Comparing pill counts and patient self-reports versus DBS tenofovir concentrations as ART adherence measurements with virologic outcomes and HIV drug resistance in a cohort of adolescents and young adults failing ART in Harare, Zimbabwe
Takudzwa J. Mtisi , Vinie Kouamou , Gene D. Morse , Tafadzwa Dzinamarira , Chiratidzo E. Ndhlovu
{"title":"Comparing pill counts and patient self-reports versus DBS tenofovir concentrations as ART adherence measurements with virologic outcomes and HIV drug resistance in a cohort of adolescents and young adults failing ART in Harare, Zimbabwe","authors":"Takudzwa J. Mtisi , Vinie Kouamou , Gene D. Morse , Tafadzwa Dzinamarira , Chiratidzo E. Ndhlovu","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Monitoring adherence presents a challenge in adolescents and it is prudent to explore several options for determining their level of adherence. This study sought to determine ART adherence levels in adolescents and young adults (on a tenofovir-containing regimen) failing ART as measured by self-reports, pill counts and DBS tenofovir concentrations and to compare levels of agreement among the methods and determine the ability of each method to predict virological suppression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a cohort study involving 107 adolescents and young adults between 10 and 24 years failing ART with viral load > 400copies/ml at enrolment. Pill count (PC) records, self-reports (SR) and DBS tenofovir concentrations (done by liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)) were used to determine adherence in adolescent participants failing ART in Harare. The latter was used as the reference method with a cut-off of 64 ng/ml. Determination of DBS tenofovir concentrations was also performed to rule out inadequate viral response due to low cumulative drug exposure despite high adherence (≥90 %). Longitudinal analysis was performed to determine the correlation of viral loads (VL) with adherence. The Kappa (<em>k</em>) coefficient was used to evaluate the level of agreement among the 3 methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Poor level of agreement was found between PC records and DBS tenofovir concentrations (<em>k</em> = −0.115). Moderate agreement was found between DBS and SR methods (<em>k</em> = 0.0557). Slight agreement was found between PC and SR methods (<em>k</em> = 0.0078). Adherence was dependent on age at HIV diagnosis (p = 0.0184) and ART initiation (p = 0.0265). Participants who were adherent were six times more likely to be suppressed at end point than their non-adherent counterparts (OR=5.7 CI 2.1 – 16.5, p < 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported measure of adherence and pill counts exhibited poor agreement with the reference method used i.e. DBS tenofovir concentrations and are thus not effective methods of predicting virological suppression.</p></div><div><h3>Trial identification</h3><p>Participants in the present study were a subset of those in the PESU intervention ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02833441</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"17 9","pages":"Article 102500"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187603412400234X/pdfft?md5=16b4404dd7367e9b349e8948097d0bee&pid=1-s2.0-S187603412400234X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187603412400234X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Monitoring adherence presents a challenge in adolescents and it is prudent to explore several options for determining their level of adherence. This study sought to determine ART adherence levels in adolescents and young adults (on a tenofovir-containing regimen) failing ART as measured by self-reports, pill counts and DBS tenofovir concentrations and to compare levels of agreement among the methods and determine the ability of each method to predict virological suppression.
Methods
This was a cohort study involving 107 adolescents and young adults between 10 and 24 years failing ART with viral load > 400copies/ml at enrolment. Pill count (PC) records, self-reports (SR) and DBS tenofovir concentrations (done by liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)) were used to determine adherence in adolescent participants failing ART in Harare. The latter was used as the reference method with a cut-off of 64 ng/ml. Determination of DBS tenofovir concentrations was also performed to rule out inadequate viral response due to low cumulative drug exposure despite high adherence (≥90 %). Longitudinal analysis was performed to determine the correlation of viral loads (VL) with adherence. The Kappa (k) coefficient was used to evaluate the level of agreement among the 3 methods.
Results
Poor level of agreement was found between PC records and DBS tenofovir concentrations (k = −0.115). Moderate agreement was found between DBS and SR methods (k = 0.0557). Slight agreement was found between PC and SR methods (k = 0.0078). Adherence was dependent on age at HIV diagnosis (p = 0.0184) and ART initiation (p = 0.0265). Participants who were adherent were six times more likely to be suppressed at end point than their non-adherent counterparts (OR=5.7 CI 2.1 – 16.5, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Self-reported measure of adherence and pill counts exhibited poor agreement with the reference method used i.e. DBS tenofovir concentrations and are thus not effective methods of predicting virological suppression.
Trial identification
Participants in the present study were a subset of those in the PESU intervention ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02833441
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
