The Impact of Scaffolding Teaching Method to Students' Learning Outcomes in Teaching Badminton

Huiwen Zhu, Junji Chen, Shutong Yang
{"title":"The Impact of Scaffolding Teaching Method to Students' Learning Outcomes in Teaching Badminton","authors":"Huiwen Zhu, Junji Chen, Shutong Yang","doi":"10.54097/qa3a3s78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study adopts the quasi-experimental method to analyze the differences of students' ability indexes before and after the experiment as well as students' responses to scaffolding teaching by intervening scaffolding teaching and traditional teaching in two badminton classes in Guilin University. The researcher selected 30 students from the two classes as the study subjects and divided them into experimental and control groups. The control group was taught by traditional teaching method and the experimental group was taught by scaffolding method after 8 weeks of experimental intervention. This study concluded that the gender ratio, grade distribution and number ratio of the control and experimental groups were comparable, which helped to reduce the influence of external factors on the results and improve the credibility of the study. Before the badminton program intervention, the control and experimental groups had similar scores. Before the badminton program intervention, there was no significant difference between the pre-test scores of the control group and the experimental group in terms of striking technique, footwork. The experimental group using the scaffolding method had a significant advantage in striking technique and footwork, which indicates the potential effectiveness of this teaching method in promoting students' skill development. The experimental group using the scaffolding method in the badminton course showed significant advantages in badminton skills. These results further demonstrate the positive role of scaffolding in physical education courses and provide a practical basis for further promotion and application of scaffolding.","PeriodicalId":512363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Educational Research","volume":"18 S26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/qa3a3s78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study adopts the quasi-experimental method to analyze the differences of students' ability indexes before and after the experiment as well as students' responses to scaffolding teaching by intervening scaffolding teaching and traditional teaching in two badminton classes in Guilin University. The researcher selected 30 students from the two classes as the study subjects and divided them into experimental and control groups. The control group was taught by traditional teaching method and the experimental group was taught by scaffolding method after 8 weeks of experimental intervention. This study concluded that the gender ratio, grade distribution and number ratio of the control and experimental groups were comparable, which helped to reduce the influence of external factors on the results and improve the credibility of the study. Before the badminton program intervention, the control and experimental groups had similar scores. Before the badminton program intervention, there was no significant difference between the pre-test scores of the control group and the experimental group in terms of striking technique, footwork. The experimental group using the scaffolding method had a significant advantage in striking technique and footwork, which indicates the potential effectiveness of this teaching method in promoting students' skill development. The experimental group using the scaffolding method in the badminton course showed significant advantages in badminton skills. These results further demonstrate the positive role of scaffolding in physical education courses and provide a practical basis for further promotion and application of scaffolding.
支架式教学法对羽毛球教学中学生学习效果的影响
本研究采用准实验法,通过对桂林大学两个羽毛球班进行支架式教学与传统教学的干预,分析实验前后学生能力指标的差异以及学生对支架式教学的反应。研究者从两个班中选取了 30 名学生作为研究对象,将他们分为实验组和对照组。对照组采用传统教学法,实验组在实验干预 8 周后采用支架式教学法。本研究认为,对照组和实验组的性别比例、年级分布和人数比例相当,有助于减少外界因素对研究结果的影响,提高研究的可信度。在羽毛球项目干预前,对照组和实验组的得分相近。在羽毛球项目干预前,对照组和实验组在击球技术、步法等方面的前测成绩无明显差异。采用支架教学法的实验组在击球技术和步法上有明显优势,这表明该教学法在促进学生技能发展方面具有潜在的有效性。在羽毛球课程中使用支架式教学法的实验组在羽毛球技术方面有明显优势。这些结果进一步证明了支架式教学法在体育课程中的积极作用,为进一步推广和应用支架式教学法提供了实践依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信