A Journey Towards a Non‐Western International Relations Theory: Non‐Western Conceptualization of the English School

Pacific Focus Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/pafo.12254
Lee Yoochul
{"title":"A Journey Towards a Non‐Western International Relations Theory: Non‐Western Conceptualization of the English School","authors":"Lee Yoochul","doi":"10.1111/pafo.12254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine non‐Western international relations theory (IRT) and explore, at the theoretical level, the potential for epistemological autonomy from the confines of Western‐centered epistemology prevalent in existing IRT. As a consequence, the non‐Western world, subjected to colonialist expansion and modernization and often regarded as merely the leaves, has been relegated to a passive role within the international system, becoming a disengaged object of little interest. However, what has existed cannot be entirely erased. While it is undeniable that international politics was predominantly developed based on a Western‐centric epistemology, other ancient civilizations had diverse international systems and orders that molded their identities as regional international societies. Consequently, the study provides a crucial backdrop for theoretical endeavors aimed at integrating the voices and experiences of the Global South into IRT, which has traditionally been dominated by Western perspectives. This study seeks to explore the potential for transcending Western intellectual hegemony by critiquing the limitations of a singular worldview and expanding and transforming the English School Theory (EST). It seeks to investigate the possibility of moving beyond Western‐centricity in international relations theory by conducting a historical comparison of civilizations across countries and the associated disciplines within civilizations as a field.","PeriodicalId":510678,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Focus","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine non‐Western international relations theory (IRT) and explore, at the theoretical level, the potential for epistemological autonomy from the confines of Western‐centered epistemology prevalent in existing IRT. As a consequence, the non‐Western world, subjected to colonialist expansion and modernization and often regarded as merely the leaves, has been relegated to a passive role within the international system, becoming a disengaged object of little interest. However, what has existed cannot be entirely erased. While it is undeniable that international politics was predominantly developed based on a Western‐centric epistemology, other ancient civilizations had diverse international systems and orders that molded their identities as regional international societies. Consequently, the study provides a crucial backdrop for theoretical endeavors aimed at integrating the voices and experiences of the Global South into IRT, which has traditionally been dominated by Western perspectives. This study seeks to explore the potential for transcending Western intellectual hegemony by critiquing the limitations of a singular worldview and expanding and transforming the English School Theory (EST). It seeks to investigate the possibility of moving beyond Western‐centricity in international relations theory by conducting a historical comparison of civilizations across countries and the associated disciplines within civilizations as a field.
非西方国际关系理论之旅:英国学派的非西方概念化
本研究的目的是考察非西方国际关系理论(IRT),并在理论层面上探讨现有国际关系理论中普遍存在的以西方为中心的认识论束缚下的认识论自主潜力。因此,非西方世界由于受到殖民主义扩张和现代化的影响,往往被认为只是一片树叶,在国际体系中一直处于被动地位,成为人们不感兴趣的脱离对象。然而,存在的东西是无法完全抹去的。不可否认,国际政治主要是基于以西方为中心的认识论而发展起来的,但其他文明古国也有多种多样的国际制度和秩序,这些制度和秩序塑造了它们作为区域性国际社会的身份。因此,本研究为旨在将全球南部的声音和经验纳入传统上由西方观点主导的国际关系与文献研究的理论努力提供了重要背景。本研究试图通过批判单一世界观的局限性以及扩展和变革英国学派理论(EST)来探索超越西方知识霸权的潜力。本研究试图通过对不同国家的文明以及文明领域内的相关学科进行历史比较,探讨在国际关系理论中超越西方中心论的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信