Salfarina Rozeman, Erry Yulian Triblas Adesta, Ali Sophian, S. H. Tomadi
{"title":"Selection of Optimal Bending Types in Die Process of L-Shaped Panels Considering the Springback Behaviours","authors":"Salfarina Rozeman, Erry Yulian Triblas Adesta, Ali Sophian, S. H. Tomadi","doi":"10.26776/ijemm.09.03.2024.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In die designing, one of the most crucial decisions is selecting the appropriate die process required to produce panels. The challenge for die designer is to comprehend the behaviour of the panel material in relation to the die processes. If the die process is not correctly determined before die fabrication, severe panel spring back may occur, which can become difficult and require additional time and effort to rectify. This paper presents research aimed at understanding the behaviour of different types of bending process combinations concerning the spring back occurrence during the stamping process of an L-shaped design intent panel. Using simulation and experiment, three types of materials with different tensile properties of 270 MPa, 440 MPa and 590 MPa, but the same thickness of 1.8 mm, were selected. The results were compared, analysed and optimized by using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) method. The results demonstrate that one-process bending with full bending (compress type) approach, is the most suitable for the three materials type L-shaped panel. The study provides guidelines for die design engineers, industrial practitioners and researchers to decide on the best approach for die process decisions, when dealing with specific panels properties, shape and thickness.","PeriodicalId":474637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26776/ijemm.09.03.2024.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In die designing, one of the most crucial decisions is selecting the appropriate die process required to produce panels. The challenge for die designer is to comprehend the behaviour of the panel material in relation to the die processes. If the die process is not correctly determined before die fabrication, severe panel spring back may occur, which can become difficult and require additional time and effort to rectify. This paper presents research aimed at understanding the behaviour of different types of bending process combinations concerning the spring back occurrence during the stamping process of an L-shaped design intent panel. Using simulation and experiment, three types of materials with different tensile properties of 270 MPa, 440 MPa and 590 MPa, but the same thickness of 1.8 mm, were selected. The results were compared, analysed and optimized by using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) method. The results demonstrate that one-process bending with full bending (compress type) approach, is the most suitable for the three materials type L-shaped panel. The study provides guidelines for die design engineers, industrial practitioners and researchers to decide on the best approach for die process decisions, when dealing with specific panels properties, shape and thickness.
在模具设计中,最关键的决定之一是选择生产面板所需的适当模具工艺。模具设计人员面临的挑战是理解面板材料与模具工艺之间的关系。如果在模具制造前没有正确确定模具工艺,可能会出现严重的面板回弹,这可能会变得非常困难,并需要额外的时间和精力来纠正。本文介绍的研究旨在了解不同类型的弯曲工艺组合在 L 型设计意向板冲压过程中发生回弹的情况。通过模拟和实验,选择了三种不同拉伸性能(270 兆帕、440 兆帕和 590 兆帕)但厚度相同(1.8 毫米)的材料。采用响应面方法(RSM)对结果进行了比较、分析和优化。结果表明,采用全弯曲(压缩型)方法的单工序弯曲最适合三种材料类型的 L 形面板。这项研究为模具设计工程师、工业从业人员和研究人员提供了指导,帮助他们在处理特定板材属性、形状和厚度时,确定模具工艺决策的最佳方法。