Palatabilidade de predadores em duas espécies neotropicais de Sepsidae (Diptera, Sciomyzoidea)

Amanda De Azevedo Silva, Caroline Costa De-Souza, Lucas Dos Anjos Rodrigues, Fernando Da Silva Carvalho-Filho
{"title":"Palatabilidade de predadores em duas espécies neotropicais de Sepsidae (Diptera, Sciomyzoidea)","authors":"Amanda De Azevedo Silva, Caroline Costa De-Souza, Lucas Dos Anjos Rodrigues, Fernando Da Silva Carvalho-Filho","doi":"10.14808/sci.plena.2024.068001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemical defense consists of the usage of substances that can cause damage to the predator or repel their attacks. A few true fly (Diptera) species use chemical defenses and among the adult ones, these mechanisms have only been formally registered in the family Sepsidae. Some species of this family possess an abdominal gland (Dufour gland) that produces a substance with a characteristic and intense odor. This odor supposedly turns the sepsids unpalatable to their predators. However, there is no study testing this hypothesis with Neotropical species yet. Thus, the aim of this study is to verify if two neotropical species of Sepsidae (Archisepsis armata and Microsepsis armillata) are unpalatable to invertebrate predators (jumping spiders, giant crab spiders, and mantises). The experiment consisted in offering specimens of sepsids (treatment group) and fruit flies (drosophilids; control group) to three species of predators. Furthermore, a study of the internal morphology of the two sepsid species has been performed to verify the presence of the Dufour gland. There has not been any significant predation difference between the sepsids and the control group, and the Dufour gland has not been found in both of them. This data suggests that both neotropical species of sepsids are not unpalatable.","PeriodicalId":506304,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Plena","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Plena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2024.068001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical defense consists of the usage of substances that can cause damage to the predator or repel their attacks. A few true fly (Diptera) species use chemical defenses and among the adult ones, these mechanisms have only been formally registered in the family Sepsidae. Some species of this family possess an abdominal gland (Dufour gland) that produces a substance with a characteristic and intense odor. This odor supposedly turns the sepsids unpalatable to their predators. However, there is no study testing this hypothesis with Neotropical species yet. Thus, the aim of this study is to verify if two neotropical species of Sepsidae (Archisepsis armata and Microsepsis armillata) are unpalatable to invertebrate predators (jumping spiders, giant crab spiders, and mantises). The experiment consisted in offering specimens of sepsids (treatment group) and fruit flies (drosophilids; control group) to three species of predators. Furthermore, a study of the internal morphology of the two sepsid species has been performed to verify the presence of the Dufour gland. There has not been any significant predation difference between the sepsids and the control group, and the Dufour gland has not been found in both of them. This data suggests that both neotropical species of sepsids are not unpalatable.
两种新热带鮨科(双翅目,鞘翅目)天敌的适口性
化学防御包括使用能对捕食者造成伤害或击退其攻击的物质。少数真正的苍蝇(双翅目)种类使用化学防御,在成蝇中,只有蝇科蝇属正式登记了这些机制。该科的一些种类有一个腹腺(杜福尔腺),能产生一种具有特殊强烈气味的物质。据说,这种气味会使鮨科鱼类的捕食者感到恶心。然而,目前还没有研究用新热带物种来验证这一假设。因此,本研究的目的是验证两种新热带鮨科物种(Archisepsis armata 和 Microsepsis armillata)对无脊椎动物捕食者(跳蛛、巨蟹蛛和螳螂)是否无味。实验包括向三种捕食者提供栉水母标本(处理组)和果蝇标本(嗜果蝇;对照组)。此外,还对两种果蝇的内部形态进行了研究,以验证杜富尔腺的存在。鮨科鱼类与对照组之间的捕食差异并不明显,而且都没有发现杜富尔腺。这些数据表明,这两种新热带sepsids并非不好吃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信