The Romanian translation and validation of the Extended Prostate Cancer Index Composite in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Q2 Medicine
Ionut Juravle, E. I. Hirișcău, Tudor Coroi, B. Feciche, Nicolae Crisan, Ioan Coman, Cristian-Doru Pop
{"title":"The Romanian translation and validation of the Extended Prostate Cancer Index Composite in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy","authors":"Ionut Juravle, E. I. Hirișcău, Tudor Coroi, B. Feciche, Nicolae Crisan, Ioan Coman, Cristian-Doru Pop","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims. To evaluate the quality of life in patients treated for prostate cancer in detail, an accessible, extensive, and easy-to-administer questionnaire is needed. The self-administered 50-item “Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite” (EPIC) is an instrument used for this purpose, but it is not officially translated into Romanian. The aim of the study was to translate and validate the Romanian version of the EPIC. \nMethods. We translated and culturally adapted the EPIC into Romanian. For validation, we included a retrospective analysis of 112 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy and a prospective study including 120 consecutive patients hospitalized before surgical treatment. Baseline and follow-up assessments took place before and at six months, two, and five years post-surgery, between January 2014 and December 2015. We performed cross-sectional correlations between the EPIC, AUASI, and SF-12 at baseline, factor analysis, and calculated the internal consistency. \nResults. For most EPIC domains and subscales, our a priori-defined criteria for reliability were fulfilled (Cronbach’s alpha 0.7–0.9). Cross-sectional correlations between EPIC scales and AUASI domain ranged from 0.23-0.69, and SF-12 domains ranged from 0.21–0.53 and 0.22–0.61, respectively. The retrospective analysis showed a medium acceptability and understanding of the EPIC questionnaire. In the prospective study, the revised EPIC draft showed an overall higher acceptability with a responding rate of 66% at a 5-year follow-up. All domains exhibited good internal consistency except for the hormonal section (Cronbach’s α = 0.67) at the 6-month follow-up. \nConclusion. The Romanian version of the EPIC is reliable, responsive and valid for measuring HRQL in prostate cancer patients. The EPIC questionnaire proved to be an exhaustive and reproducible instrument for evaluating the quality of life in Romanian prostate cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims. To evaluate the quality of life in patients treated for prostate cancer in detail, an accessible, extensive, and easy-to-administer questionnaire is needed. The self-administered 50-item “Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite” (EPIC) is an instrument used for this purpose, but it is not officially translated into Romanian. The aim of the study was to translate and validate the Romanian version of the EPIC. Methods. We translated and culturally adapted the EPIC into Romanian. For validation, we included a retrospective analysis of 112 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy and a prospective study including 120 consecutive patients hospitalized before surgical treatment. Baseline and follow-up assessments took place before and at six months, two, and five years post-surgery, between January 2014 and December 2015. We performed cross-sectional correlations between the EPIC, AUASI, and SF-12 at baseline, factor analysis, and calculated the internal consistency. Results. For most EPIC domains and subscales, our a priori-defined criteria for reliability were fulfilled (Cronbach’s alpha 0.7–0.9). Cross-sectional correlations between EPIC scales and AUASI domain ranged from 0.23-0.69, and SF-12 domains ranged from 0.21–0.53 and 0.22–0.61, respectively. The retrospective analysis showed a medium acceptability and understanding of the EPIC questionnaire. In the prospective study, the revised EPIC draft showed an overall higher acceptability with a responding rate of 66% at a 5-year follow-up. All domains exhibited good internal consistency except for the hormonal section (Cronbach’s α = 0.67) at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion. The Romanian version of the EPIC is reliable, responsive and valid for measuring HRQL in prostate cancer patients. The EPIC questionnaire proved to be an exhaustive and reproducible instrument for evaluating the quality of life in Romanian prostate cancer patients.
罗马尼亚语翻译并验证了前列腺癌根治术患者的前列腺癌扩展指数综合指数
背景和目的。为了详细评估接受前列腺癌治疗的患者的生活质量,需要一份易于使用、内容广泛且易于填写的调查问卷。由 50 个项目组成的自填式 "前列腺癌综合指数扩展表"(EPIC)就是用于此目的的一种工具,但尚未正式翻译成罗马尼亚语。本研究旨在翻译并验证 EPIC 的罗马尼亚语版本。研究方法我们将 EPIC 翻译成罗马尼亚语并进行了文化调整。为了进行验证,我们对 112 名接受机器人前列腺癌根治术的患者进行了回顾性分析,并对 120 名手术治疗前住院的连续患者进行了前瞻性研究。基线和随访评估在 2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间的术前、术后 6 个月、2 年和 5 年进行。我们对基线时的 EPIC、AUASI 和 SF-12 进行了横断面相关性分析、因子分析,并计算了内部一致性。结果显示对于大多数 EPIC 领域和分量表,我们事先定义的可靠性标准均已满足(Cronbach's alpha 0.7-0.9)。EPIC 量表与 AUASI 领域和 SF-12 领域的横向相关性分别为 0.23-0.69 和 0.21-0.53 及 0.22-0.61 之间。回顾性分析表明,EPIC问卷的可接受性和理解度处于中等水平。在前瞻性研究中,修订后的 EPIC 草案显示出总体较高的可接受性,5 年随访的应答率为 66%。在 6 个月的随访中,除荷尔蒙部分(克朗巴赫α = 0.67)外,所有领域均表现出良好的内部一致性。结论罗马尼亚语版 EPIC 在测量前列腺癌患者的 HRQL 方面具有可靠性、响应性和有效性。EPIC 问卷被证明是评估罗马尼亚前列腺癌患者生活质量的详尽且可重复的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信