Shared Book Reading Experiences for Young Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems

Braelyn Wence, Ciera M. Lorio, Amy Yacucci
{"title":"Shared Book Reading Experiences for Young Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems","authors":"Braelyn Wence, Ciera M. Lorio, Amy Yacucci","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Shared book reading (SBR) is an evidence-based literacy activity that promotes the development of oral language and emergent literacy skills in young children; however, literature regarding best practices for parents of children with developmental disabilities under the age of 5 years, specifically those with complex communication needs, is severely limited. In this descriptive study, we aimed to better understand how families of toddlers/preschoolers incorporated augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) into SBR interactions.\n \n \n \n Videos of SBR interactions were collected across five families with children between 35 and 48 months of age who used AAC systems. Three families had previous training in AAC use during SBR; two families did not have previous training and reportedly did not use their child's AAC system during typical SBR interactions at home. Thus, SBR without AAC was considered “typical” for these two families, and behaviors were compared across two conditions: SBR without AAC and SBR with AAC. Each video was coded for a variety of parent and child behaviors, including asking questions, repetitions, modeling/commenting, expanding/extending, defining vocabulary, affirmations, initiations, and responses. The communication modality used was coded for each behavior.\n \n \n \n Analysis of the video coding revealed that parents used a variety of strategies and that children relied on multimodal means of communication during SBR. For the two families who had videos collected across two conditions, namely, SBR without AAC and SBR with AAC, family AAC use increased the overall duration of SBR activities. For all families, the frequency of parent SBR strategy use increased the SBR duration.\n \n \n \n This study adds to the limited research on SBR practices with toddlers/preschoolers who use AAC. Directions for future research and the implications of the study are discussed.\n \n \n \n \n https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26240408\n \n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":" 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared book reading (SBR) is an evidence-based literacy activity that promotes the development of oral language and emergent literacy skills in young children; however, literature regarding best practices for parents of children with developmental disabilities under the age of 5 years, specifically those with complex communication needs, is severely limited. In this descriptive study, we aimed to better understand how families of toddlers/preschoolers incorporated augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) into SBR interactions. Videos of SBR interactions were collected across five families with children between 35 and 48 months of age who used AAC systems. Three families had previous training in AAC use during SBR; two families did not have previous training and reportedly did not use their child's AAC system during typical SBR interactions at home. Thus, SBR without AAC was considered “typical” for these two families, and behaviors were compared across two conditions: SBR without AAC and SBR with AAC. Each video was coded for a variety of parent and child behaviors, including asking questions, repetitions, modeling/commenting, expanding/extending, defining vocabulary, affirmations, initiations, and responses. The communication modality used was coded for each behavior. Analysis of the video coding revealed that parents used a variety of strategies and that children relied on multimodal means of communication during SBR. For the two families who had videos collected across two conditions, namely, SBR without AAC and SBR with AAC, family AAC use increased the overall duration of SBR activities. For all families, the frequency of parent SBR strategy use increased the SBR duration. This study adds to the limited research on SBR practices with toddlers/preschoolers who use AAC. Directions for future research and the implications of the study are discussed. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26240408
为使用辅助和替代性交流系统的幼儿提供共享图书阅读体验
共享图书阅读(SBR)是一种以证据为基础的识字活动,可促进幼儿口语和萌芽识字技能的发展;然而,有关 5 岁以下发育障碍儿童(尤其是有复杂交流需求的儿童)家长最佳实践的文献却非常有限。在这项描述性研究中,我们旨在更好地了解学步儿童/学龄前儿童的家庭如何将辅助和替代性交流(AAC)融入到 SBR 互动中。 我们收集了五个家庭的 SBR 互动视频,这些家庭的孩子年龄在 35 到 48 个月之间,使用 AAC 系统。其中三个家庭以前接受过在 SBR 期间使用 AAC 的培训;两个家庭以前没有接受过培训,据说在家里进行典型的 SBR 互动时也没有使用孩子的 AAC 系统。因此,对于这两个家庭来说,不使用辅助交流系统的 SBR 被认为是 "典型 "的,而行为则在两种情况下进行比较:在两种情况下对孩子的行为进行比较:不使用辅助交流系统的 SBR 和使用辅助交流系统的 SBR。每段视频都对父母和孩子的各种行为进行了编码,包括提问、重复、示范/评论、扩展/延伸、词汇定义、肯定、启动和回应。对每种行为所使用的交流方式都进行了编码。 对视频编码的分析表明,在进行 SBR 时,父母使用了多种策略,而儿童则依赖于多模态交流方式。对于在两种情况下收集到视频的两个家庭,即不使用辅助交流工具的 SBR 和使用辅助交流工具的 SBR,家庭使用辅助交流工具增加了 SBR 活动的总体持续时间。在所有家庭中,家长使用 SBR 策略的频率增加了 SBR 的持续时间。 本研究为有关使用助听器的学步儿童/学龄前儿童SBR实践的有限研究增添了新的内容。https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26240408
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信