Mud cohesion governs unvegetated meander migration rates and deposit architecture

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Douglas, Kimberly Litwin Miller, Michael P. Lamb
{"title":"Mud cohesion governs unvegetated meander migration rates and deposit architecture","authors":"M. Douglas, Kimberly Litwin Miller, Michael P. Lamb","doi":"10.1130/b37315.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetation is thought to be a main source of riverbank cohesion, enabling meandering and a deposit architecture characterized by sandy channel belts isolated in mudstone. However, early Earth and Mars had meandering rivers without vegetation, implying that other sources of bank strength can allow meandering with potentially different deposit characteristics. Here we studied the Amargosa River in Death Valley, California, USA, as a modern analog of meandering rivers without vegetation. We monitored flow and erosion at two bends and used radiocarbon dating of strandlines to quantify flood frequency. We also sampled cutbank mud and constrained an erosion theory using flume experiments. Cutbank erosion occurred for floods with >2 yr recurrence intervals, and 18 cm occurred for an ∼6 yr reoccurrence, bankfull event. Mud set the rate of meander migration: salt crusts rapidly and completely dissolved during floods, vegetation was absent, and mud entrainment theory matched observed erosion rates. Flood-frequency analysis showed that most bank erosion occurs at flows below bankfull, challenging the threshold channel hypothesis. We used meander migration rates to constrain the time scale of channel-belt formation and compared it to the time scale of avulsion. These calculations, combined with floodplain facies mapping and core sedimentology, indicated a likely deposit architecture of sandy point bar accretion sets intermixed with muddy overbank facies. This deposit architecture is characteristic of vegetated meandering rivers, but due to muddy banks, occurred for the Amargosa River in the absence of plants.","PeriodicalId":55104,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/b37315.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation is thought to be a main source of riverbank cohesion, enabling meandering and a deposit architecture characterized by sandy channel belts isolated in mudstone. However, early Earth and Mars had meandering rivers without vegetation, implying that other sources of bank strength can allow meandering with potentially different deposit characteristics. Here we studied the Amargosa River in Death Valley, California, USA, as a modern analog of meandering rivers without vegetation. We monitored flow and erosion at two bends and used radiocarbon dating of strandlines to quantify flood frequency. We also sampled cutbank mud and constrained an erosion theory using flume experiments. Cutbank erosion occurred for floods with >2 yr recurrence intervals, and 18 cm occurred for an ∼6 yr reoccurrence, bankfull event. Mud set the rate of meander migration: salt crusts rapidly and completely dissolved during floods, vegetation was absent, and mud entrainment theory matched observed erosion rates. Flood-frequency analysis showed that most bank erosion occurs at flows below bankfull, challenging the threshold channel hypothesis. We used meander migration rates to constrain the time scale of channel-belt formation and compared it to the time scale of avulsion. These calculations, combined with floodplain facies mapping and core sedimentology, indicated a likely deposit architecture of sandy point bar accretion sets intermixed with muddy overbank facies. This deposit architecture is characteristic of vegetated meandering rivers, but due to muddy banks, occurred for the Amargosa River in the absence of plants.
泥质内聚力制约着无植被河曲的迁移率和沉积结构
植被被认为是河岸内聚力的主要来源,使河流能够蜿蜒流淌,并形成以泥岩中孤立的砂质河道带为特征的沉积结构。然而,早期地球和火星上的河流蜿蜒曲折,却没有植被,这意味着其他河岸强度来源也能使河流蜿蜒曲折,并可能具有不同的沉积特征。在这里,我们研究了美国加利福尼亚州死亡谷的阿马戈萨河,将其作为没有植被的现代蜿蜒河流的类似物。我们监测了两个弯曲处的水流和侵蚀情况,并使用放射性碳年代测定法测定了河道的洪水频率。我们还对切岸淤泥进行了取样,并利用水槽实验对侵蚀理论进行了验证。重现期大于 2 年的洪水会造成切岸侵蚀,重现期大于 6 年的满岸洪水会造成 18 厘米的切岸侵蚀。泥浆决定了河曲迁移的速度:洪水期间盐壳迅速完全溶解,植被缺失,泥浆夹带理论与观测到的侵蚀速度相吻合。洪水频率分析表明,大部分河岸侵蚀发生在流量低于丰水期时,这对阈值河道假说提出了挑战。我们利用蜿蜒迁移率来限制河道带形成的时间尺度,并将其与崩塌的时间尺度进行比较。这些计算结果与洪泛区地貌测绘和岩心沉积学相结合,显示出可能的沉积结构是沙质点状条石堆积层与泥质河岸面相混合。这种沉积结构是有植被的蜿蜒河流的特征,但由于河岸泥泞,阿玛戈萨河在没有植物的情况下也出现了这种沉积结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Geological Society of America Bulletin 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The GSA Bulletin is the Society''s premier scholarly journal, published continuously since 1890. Its first editor was William John (WJ) McGee, who was responsible for establishing much of its original style and format. Fully refereed, each bimonthly issue includes 16-20 papers focusing on the most definitive, timely, and classic-style research in all earth-science disciplines. The Bulletin welcomes most contributions that are data-rich, mature studies of broad interest (i.e., of interest to more than one sub-discipline of earth science) and of lasting, archival quality. These include (but are not limited to) studies related to tectonics, structural geology, geochemistry, geophysics, hydrogeology, marine geology, paleoclimatology, planetary geology, quaternary geology/geomorphology, sedimentary geology, stratigraphy, and volcanology. The journal is committed to further developing both the scope of its content and its international profile so that it publishes the most current earth science research that will be of wide interest to geoscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信