Zur Herkunftsdebatte in der europäischen Runenforschung

Çağıl Çayır
{"title":"Zur Herkunftsdebatte in der europäischen Runenforschung","authors":"Çağıl Çayır","doi":"10.35236/jots.1512928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the beginning of runic studies in Scandinavia in the 16th century, there has been a debate about the origin of runic writing. But where does the debate come from? Has it always been pursued according to scientific standards? What are the sources and what is the current state of research? This study shows that the debate about the origin of the runic script is a feigned de-bate to suppress its source-based origin, which is called “divine” and “Turkish”. The reason for the discussion was the crusade propaganda against the Turks after 1453. Today, more recent comparative studies once again point to a close cultural-historical connection between the early Turks and the “Germanic tribes”. This opens up a new interdisciplinary field of research for English, German, Scandinavian and Turkish studies. At the same time, the previous prejudiced separation of cultures is no longer valid. This reveals a research perspective that is as revolu-tionary as it is promising.","PeriodicalId":497709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of old Turkic studies","volume":"121 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of old Turkic studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35236/jots.1512928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of runic studies in Scandinavia in the 16th century, there has been a debate about the origin of runic writing. But where does the debate come from? Has it always been pursued according to scientific standards? What are the sources and what is the current state of research? This study shows that the debate about the origin of the runic script is a feigned de-bate to suppress its source-based origin, which is called “divine” and “Turkish”. The reason for the discussion was the crusade propaganda against the Turks after 1453. Today, more recent comparative studies once again point to a close cultural-historical connection between the early Turks and the “Germanic tribes”. This opens up a new interdisciplinary field of research for English, German, Scandinavian and Turkish studies. At the same time, the previous prejudiced separation of cultures is no longer valid. This reveals a research perspective that is as revolu-tionary as it is promising.
欧洲符文研究中的起源之争
自 16 世纪斯堪的纳维亚开始研究符文以来,人们一直在争论符文文字的起源。但争论从何而来?它一直是按照科学标准进行的吗?研究的来源和现状如何?本研究表明,关于符文文字起源的争论是为了压制其基于来源的起源,即所谓的 "神性 "和 "土耳其性 "而假装出来的。讨论的原因是 1453 年后针对土耳其人的十字军东征宣传。如今,最新的比较研究再次指出,早期土耳其人与 "日耳曼部落 "之间有着密切的文化历史联系。这为英语、德语、斯堪的纳维亚语和土耳其语研究开辟了一个新的跨学科研究领域。与此同时,以往将不同文化割裂开来的偏见也不再适用。这揭示了一个既具有革命性又充满希望的研究视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信