Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: A prospective, multi-center, randomized study

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
C. Qu, Fei-Yu Zhang, Wen Wang, Feng-Yu Gao, Wu-Lian Lin, Hao Zhang, Guangjin Chen, Yi Zhang, Ming-ming Li, Zheng-Hong Li, Mei-Hong Cai, Lei-ming Xu, F. Shen
{"title":"Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: A prospective, multi-center, randomized study","authors":"C. Qu, Fei-Yu Zhang, Wen Wang, Feng-Yu Gao, Wu-Lian Lin, Hao Zhang, Guangjin Chen, Yi Zhang, Ming-ming Li, Zheng-Hong Li, Mei-Hong Cai, Lei-ming Xu, F. Shen","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) is a nonsurgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids but is limited by recurrence and post-procedural pain.\n AIM\n To evaluate satisfaction, long-term recurrence, and post-procedural pain in managing internal hemorrhoids using a combination of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and ERBL.\n METHODS\n This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. A total of 195 consecutive patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids were enrolled from four tertiary hospitals and randomly divided into a cap-assisted endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB) or an ERBL group. All patients were followed-up for 12 months. Symptom-based severity and post-procedural pain were assessed using a hemorrhoid severity score (HSS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Continuous variables were reported as medians and interquartile range.\n RESULTS\n One hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled, with 98 in the EFSB group. HSS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL group at 8 weeks [4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0), P = 0.003] and 12-month [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0), P < 0.001] of follow-up. The prolapse recurrence rate was lower in the EFSB group at 12 months (11.2% vs 21.6%, P = 0.038). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that EFSB treatment [B = -0.915, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.301 to −0.530, P = 0.001] and rubber band number (B = 0.843, 95%CI: 0.595-1.092, P < 0.001) were negatively and independently associated with the VAS score 24 hours post-procedure. The median VAS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-4.0), P < 0.001].\n CONCLUSION\n Cap-assisted EFSB provided long-term satisfaction and effective relief from the recurrence of prolapse and pain 24 hours post-procedure.","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) is a nonsurgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids but is limited by recurrence and post-procedural pain. AIM To evaluate satisfaction, long-term recurrence, and post-procedural pain in managing internal hemorrhoids using a combination of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and ERBL. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. A total of 195 consecutive patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids were enrolled from four tertiary hospitals and randomly divided into a cap-assisted endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB) or an ERBL group. All patients were followed-up for 12 months. Symptom-based severity and post-procedural pain were assessed using a hemorrhoid severity score (HSS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Continuous variables were reported as medians and interquartile range. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled, with 98 in the EFSB group. HSS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL group at 8 weeks [4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0), P = 0.003] and 12-month [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0), P < 0.001] of follow-up. The prolapse recurrence rate was lower in the EFSB group at 12 months (11.2% vs 21.6%, P = 0.038). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that EFSB treatment [B = -0.915, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.301 to −0.530, P = 0.001] and rubber band number (B = 0.843, 95%CI: 0.595-1.092, P < 0.001) were negatively and independently associated with the VAS score 24 hours post-procedure. The median VAS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-4.0), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION Cap-assisted EFSB provided long-term satisfaction and effective relief from the recurrence of prolapse and pain 24 hours post-procedure.
治疗 II-III 级内痔的内镜下聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂包扎术:前瞻性多中心随机研究
背景 内窥镜橡皮圈结扎术(ERBL)是一种治疗无症状内痔的非手术疗法,但受复发和术后疼痛的限制。目的 评估采用聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂疗法和内镜下橡皮圈结扎术联合治疗内痔的满意度、长期复发率和术后疼痛。方法 这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机研究。四家三甲医院共招募了 195 名被诊断为 II-III 级内痔的连续患者,并将他们随机分为帽辅助内镜下聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂注射(EFSB)组或 ERBL 组。所有患者均接受了 12 个月的随访。采用痔疮严重程度评分(HSS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对症状严重程度和术后疼痛进行评估。连续变量以中位数和四分位数间距进行报告。结果 有 195 名患者接受了治疗,其中 98 人属于 EFSB 组。随访8周[4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0),P = 0.003]和12个月[2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0),P < 0.001]时,EFSB组的HSS低于ERBL组。在12个月的随访中,EFSB组的脱垂复发率较低(11.2% vs 21.6%,P = 0.038)。多元线性回归分析表明,EFSB治疗[B = -0.915,95%置信区间(CI):-1.301至-0.530,P = 0.001]和橡皮圈数量(B = 0.843,95%CI:0.595-1.092,P <0.001)与术后24小时的VAS评分呈独立负相关。EFSB 组的 VAS 中位数低于 ERBL 组 [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-4.0),P < 0.001]。结论 帽式辅助 EFSB 术后 24 小时内,脱垂复发和疼痛可得到长期满意和有效缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信