Forest Structure Regulates Response of Erosion-Induced Carbon Loss to Rainfall Characteristics

Forests Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.3390/f15071269
Weiwei Wang, Chao Xu, Teng-Chiu Lin, Zhijie Yang, Xiaofei Liu, Decheng Xiong, Shidong Chen, Guangshui Chen, Yusheng Yang
{"title":"Forest Structure Regulates Response of Erosion-Induced Carbon Loss to Rainfall Characteristics","authors":"Weiwei Wang, Chao Xu, Teng-Chiu Lin, Zhijie Yang, Xiaofei Liu, Decheng Xiong, Shidong Chen, Guangshui Chen, Yusheng Yang","doi":"10.3390/f15071269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forestation is a common measure to control erosion-induced soil and carbon (C) loss, but the effect can vary substantially between different types of forest. Here, we measured event-based runoff, soil, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC) and total C loss with runoff plots (20 m × 5 m) in a broad-leaved and a coniferous forest in subtropical China and explored their relationships with rainfall amount, average intensity, maximum 5-min intensity and rainfall erosivity. The broad-leaved forest had a denser canopy but sparse understory vegetation while the coniferous forest had a relatively open canopy but dense understory vegetation. The results showed that runoff, soil, DOC, POC and total C losses were all significantly higher in the broad-leaved forest than the coniferous forest despite the potentially higher canopy interception associated with the greater leaf area index of the broad-leaved forest. The mean runoff in the broad-leaved forest was 3.03 ± 0.20 m3 ha−1 event−1 (mean ± standard error) and 12.49 ± 0.18 m3 ha−1 event−1 in the coniferous forest. The mean soil, DOC, POC and total C loss (kg ha−1 event−1) was 1.12 ± 0.16, 0.045 ± 0.003, 0.118 ± 0.016 and 0.163 ± 0.017, respectively, in the broad-leaved forest and 0.66 ± 0.09, 0.020 ± 0.002, 0.060 ± 0.009 and 0.081 ± 0.010, respectively, in the coniferous forest. Runoff and DOC losses were driven by rainfall in two forests, but the key rainfall characteristic driving soil, POC and total C losses was different in the broad-leaved forest from that in the coniferous forest due to their different understory patterns. Soil, POC and total C losses were mostly driven by rainfall amount in the broad-leaved forest but by EI30 in the conifer forest. Our findings highlight that the response of erosion-induced carbon loss to rainfall characteristics differs between different forest types of the same age but contrasting overstory and understory vegetation covers. Moreover, our study underscores the overlooked significance of understory vegetation in regulating these effects. Thus, we call for the inclusion of understory vegetation in the modeling of soil and carbon erosion in forest ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":505742,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":"100 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forestation is a common measure to control erosion-induced soil and carbon (C) loss, but the effect can vary substantially between different types of forest. Here, we measured event-based runoff, soil, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC) and total C loss with runoff plots (20 m × 5 m) in a broad-leaved and a coniferous forest in subtropical China and explored their relationships with rainfall amount, average intensity, maximum 5-min intensity and rainfall erosivity. The broad-leaved forest had a denser canopy but sparse understory vegetation while the coniferous forest had a relatively open canopy but dense understory vegetation. The results showed that runoff, soil, DOC, POC and total C losses were all significantly higher in the broad-leaved forest than the coniferous forest despite the potentially higher canopy interception associated with the greater leaf area index of the broad-leaved forest. The mean runoff in the broad-leaved forest was 3.03 ± 0.20 m3 ha−1 event−1 (mean ± standard error) and 12.49 ± 0.18 m3 ha−1 event−1 in the coniferous forest. The mean soil, DOC, POC and total C loss (kg ha−1 event−1) was 1.12 ± 0.16, 0.045 ± 0.003, 0.118 ± 0.016 and 0.163 ± 0.017, respectively, in the broad-leaved forest and 0.66 ± 0.09, 0.020 ± 0.002, 0.060 ± 0.009 and 0.081 ± 0.010, respectively, in the coniferous forest. Runoff and DOC losses were driven by rainfall in two forests, but the key rainfall characteristic driving soil, POC and total C losses was different in the broad-leaved forest from that in the coniferous forest due to their different understory patterns. Soil, POC and total C losses were mostly driven by rainfall amount in the broad-leaved forest but by EI30 in the conifer forest. Our findings highlight that the response of erosion-induced carbon loss to rainfall characteristics differs between different forest types of the same age but contrasting overstory and understory vegetation covers. Moreover, our study underscores the overlooked significance of understory vegetation in regulating these effects. Thus, we call for the inclusion of understory vegetation in the modeling of soil and carbon erosion in forest ecosystems.
森林结构调整侵蚀引起的碳损失对降雨特征的响应
植树造林是控制侵蚀引起的土壤和碳(C)流失的常用措施,但不同类型森林的植树造林效果会有很大差异。在这里,我们在中国亚热带的一片阔叶林和一片针叶林中,通过径流小区(20 m × 5 m)测量了基于事件的径流、土壤、溶解有机碳(DOC)、颗粒有机碳(POC)和总碳损失,并探讨了它们与降雨量、平均强度、最大 5 分钟强度和降雨侵蚀率之间的关系。阔叶林的冠层较密,但林下植被稀疏;针叶林的冠层相对开阔,但林下植被茂密。结果表明,尽管阔叶林的叶面积指数更高,树冠截流能力可能更强,但阔叶林的径流、土壤、DOC、POC 和总 C 损失量都明显高于针叶林。阔叶林的平均径流量为 3.03 ± 0.20 立方米/公顷-1 事件-1(平均值 ± 标准误差),针叶林的平均径流量为 12.49 ± 0.18 立方米/公顷-1 事件-1。阔叶林的平均土壤、DOC、POC 和总 C 损失量(kg ha-1 event-1)分别为 1.12 ± 0.16、0.045 ± 0.003、0.118 ± 0.016 和 0.163 ± 0.017,针叶林则分别为 0.66 ± 0.09、0.020 ± 0.002、0.060 ± 0.009 和 0.081 ± 0.010。两种森林的径流和 DOC 损失都是由降雨驱动的,但由于阔叶林和针叶林的林下模式不同,驱动土壤、POC 和总 C 损失的主要降雨特征也不同。阔叶林的土壤、POC 和总 C 损失主要受降雨量的影响,而针叶林的土壤、POC 和总 C 损失则主要受 EI30 的影响。我们的研究结果突出表明,不同类型的森林,虽然树龄相同,但上层和下层植被覆盖率不同,其侵蚀引起的碳损失对降雨特征的响应也不同。此外,我们的研究还强调了林下植被在调节这些效应方面被忽视的重要性。因此,我们呼吁将林下植被纳入森林生态系统土壤和碳侵蚀模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信