The Effect of Capital Intensity, Litigation Risk, Profitability, Cash Flow, Institutional Ownership, and Company Size on Accounting Conservatism

Nur Intan Safira, Mursidah Mursidah, I. Indrayani, Yunina Yunina
{"title":"The Effect of Capital Intensity, Litigation Risk, Profitability, Cash Flow, Institutional Ownership, and Company Size on Accounting Conservatism","authors":"Nur Intan Safira, Mursidah Mursidah, I. Indrayani, Yunina Yunina","doi":"10.29103/jak.v12i1.16057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the effect of capital intensity, litigation risk, profitability, cash flow, institutional ownership, and company size on accounting conservatism. The population of this study was BUMN companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) from 2017 to 2022. Samples were collected using the purposive sampling method, and 14 companies were sampled with an observation period of 6 years, resulting in 84 observations. The research method employed a quantitative approach with data analysis techniques using classical assumption tests. Hypothesis testing was conducted using panel data regression methods with the assistance of the EViews ver.12 program. The results of this study indicate that capital intensity had a positive but insignificant effect on accounting conservatism. Litigation risk had a significant positive effect on accounting conservatism. Profitability had a negative and significant effect on accounting conservatism. Cash flow had a significant positive effect on accounting conservatism. Institutional ownership had a positive but insignificant effect on accounting conservatism. The size of the company had a negative and significant effect on accounting conservatism.","PeriodicalId":31756,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v12i1.16057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of capital intensity, litigation risk, profitability, cash flow, institutional ownership, and company size on accounting conservatism. The population of this study was BUMN companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) from 2017 to 2022. Samples were collected using the purposive sampling method, and 14 companies were sampled with an observation period of 6 years, resulting in 84 observations. The research method employed a quantitative approach with data analysis techniques using classical assumption tests. Hypothesis testing was conducted using panel data regression methods with the assistance of the EViews ver.12 program. The results of this study indicate that capital intensity had a positive but insignificant effect on accounting conservatism. Litigation risk had a significant positive effect on accounting conservatism. Profitability had a negative and significant effect on accounting conservatism. Cash flow had a significant positive effect on accounting conservatism. Institutional ownership had a positive but insignificant effect on accounting conservatism. The size of the company had a negative and significant effect on accounting conservatism.
资本密集度、诉讼风险、盈利能力、现金流、机构所有权和公司规模对会计保守主义的影响
本研究旨在考察资本密集度、诉讼风险、盈利能力、现金流、机构所有权和公司规模对会计保守主义的影响。本研究的研究对象是2017年至2022年在印度尼西亚证券交易所(BEI)上市的BUMN公司。样本收集采用目的抽样法,共抽取了 14 家公司,观察期为 6 年,观察结果为 84 个。研究方法采用定量方法,数据分析技术采用经典假设检验。在 EViews ver.12 程序的帮助下,使用面板数据回归方法进行了假设检验。研究结果表明,资本密集度对会计保守主义有积极影响,但不显著。诉讼风险对会计保守主义有显著的正向影响。盈利能力对会计保守主义有显著的负向影响。现金流对会计保守主义有显著的正向影响。机构所有权对会计保守主义有积极影响,但不明显。公司规模对会计保守主义有显著的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信