The Interplay Between Cybersecurity in Europe and the Development of the General Data Protection Regulation: A Study of Lateral Pressure

INyoman Aji, Suadhana Rai, Yanyan M.Yani, R. D. Heryadi, Asep Kamaluddin
{"title":"The Interplay Between Cybersecurity in Europe and the Development of the General Data Protection Regulation: A Study of Lateral Pressure","authors":"INyoman Aji, Suadhana Rai, Yanyan M.Yani, R. D. Heryadi, Asep Kamaluddin","doi":"10.59762/ijerm205275792220240705094106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The securitization of cyberspace has been a specter to the political studies in various countries. This article focuses on the dynamic of speech act on implementation consent and its relation to the theory of lateral pressure formulated by Nazli in studying cyber politics. Since 2018, the European Commission has implemented GDPR as a basic law related to data transfer, collection and process (TCP). This policy has brought a fundamental problem to the activity conducted by the state and private sector. Moreover, it was also criticized that this policy has brought to the discrimination of algorithm that came to bias to the minority group. In speak of Methodology, we used qualitative research of 418 articles with the keyword ‘consent’ focusing on Social and Humanities Science in Journal Sage; after manual analysis, we found 146 articles related to the consent study and social science. The final project is to find out the significant tendency of how Europe has securitized GDPR through speech acts by correlating it to the Lateral Pressure Index. The potential implications of the finding could give theoretical preference in formulating a data protection base policy.","PeriodicalId":503861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Empirical Research Methods","volume":"74 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Empirical Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59762/ijerm205275792220240705094106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The securitization of cyberspace has been a specter to the political studies in various countries. This article focuses on the dynamic of speech act on implementation consent and its relation to the theory of lateral pressure formulated by Nazli in studying cyber politics. Since 2018, the European Commission has implemented GDPR as a basic law related to data transfer, collection and process (TCP). This policy has brought a fundamental problem to the activity conducted by the state and private sector. Moreover, it was also criticized that this policy has brought to the discrimination of algorithm that came to bias to the minority group. In speak of Methodology, we used qualitative research of 418 articles with the keyword ‘consent’ focusing on Social and Humanities Science in Journal Sage; after manual analysis, we found 146 articles related to the consent study and social science. The final project is to find out the significant tendency of how Europe has securitized GDPR through speech acts by correlating it to the Lateral Pressure Index. The potential implications of the finding could give theoretical preference in formulating a data protection base policy.
欧洲网络安全与《通用数据保护条例》发展之间的相互作用:横向压力研究
网络空间的安全化一直是各国政治研究的一个幽灵。本文主要探讨实施同意的言语行为动态及其与纳兹利提出的横向压力理论在网络政治研究中的关系。自2018年起,欧盟委员会实施了与数据传输、收集和处理(TCP)相关的基本法GDPR。这一政策给国家和私营部门开展的活动带来了根本性的问题。此外,该政策还被批评为对少数群体算法的歧视。在研究方法上,我们使用了定性研究方法,以 "同意 "为关键词,在 "Journal Sage "的社会科学和人文科学类期刊中检索了 418 篇文章;经过人工分析,我们找到了 146 篇与同意研究和社会科学相关的文章。最后一个项目是通过与横向压力指数相关联,找出欧洲如何通过言论行为将 GDPR 安全化的重要趋势。研究结果的潜在影响可为制定数据保护基础政策提供理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信