Evaluating the Impacts of Integrated Pest Management Techniques on Cotton Crop for Cost-effectiveness as Recommended by Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra, India

Devyanee K. Nemade, S. Warade, B. C. Nandeshwar, Subhangi G. Parshuramkar
{"title":"Evaluating the Impacts of Integrated Pest Management Techniques on Cotton Crop for Cost-effectiveness as Recommended by Dr. PDKV, Akola, Maharashtra, India","authors":"Devyanee K. Nemade, S. Warade, B. C. Nandeshwar, Subhangi G. Parshuramkar","doi":"10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i82698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since cotton is a major crop grown for commercial purposes in the Vidarbha region, Dr. PDKV Akola conducted and recommended the current study, which has several goals, including determining the extent to which recommended technology has been adopted in cotton production, examining input utilization in cotton at varying levels of adoption of IPM technology, calculating the cost-effectiveness and profitability of cotton at varying levels of adoption of IPM technology, and analyzing the barriers to technology adoption. The districts of Akola and Buldhana in Maharashtra State's Vidarbha area served as the study's locations. Three tahasils—Akola, Akot, and Sangrampur—were chosen from these districts, and 120 farmers were chosen from these villages, namely Varvat Khanderao, Khiroda, Sangrampur, Rambhapur, Mandala, Kinkhed Purna, and Khambora. The primary data, which cover the years 2022–2023, were gathered using a straightforward random sample technique. As a result of input usage, the group with a high adoption level utilized the most human labor. All three categories had seed rates, resistant variety usage at the indicated level, and sowing times that were closer to the recommended level. Farmyard manure, at 30.68 quintals per hectare, is most commonly used in the high adopter category. This is followed by medium adopters (16.80 q/ha) and low adopters (14.05 q/ha). The results of applying fertilizer (NPK) indicate that more was applied in all three categories at the recommended level. The highest per hectare yield, 16.64 quintals, was recorded by the high adopter group, followed by 14.01 quintals for the medium adopter group, and 12.71 quintals for the low adopter group. The net returns at Costs \"A1,\" \"B2,\" and \"C2\" were in the high adopter category, with amounts of Rs. 76557.94/-, Rs. 59781.64/-, and Rs. 50163.47/-. For low, medium, and high adopters, the input-output ratios at cost \"A1\" were 1.95, 2.05, and 2.27, respectively, but the input-output ratios at cost \"C2\" were 1.36, 1.43, and 1.58 for these same adopters. High adopter farmers saved Rs. 599.58 and Rs. 854.32/-per quintal at Costs \"A1\" and \"C2\" as a result of the per unit cost decrease. IPM technology was discovered to make cotton farming profitable because it reduced the cost of plant protection measures while simultaneously increasing yield. As a result, all cotton growers need to employ IPM technology more widely.","PeriodicalId":510783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Agriculture International","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Agriculture International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i82698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since cotton is a major crop grown for commercial purposes in the Vidarbha region, Dr. PDKV Akola conducted and recommended the current study, which has several goals, including determining the extent to which recommended technology has been adopted in cotton production, examining input utilization in cotton at varying levels of adoption of IPM technology, calculating the cost-effectiveness and profitability of cotton at varying levels of adoption of IPM technology, and analyzing the barriers to technology adoption. The districts of Akola and Buldhana in Maharashtra State's Vidarbha area served as the study's locations. Three tahasils—Akola, Akot, and Sangrampur—were chosen from these districts, and 120 farmers were chosen from these villages, namely Varvat Khanderao, Khiroda, Sangrampur, Rambhapur, Mandala, Kinkhed Purna, and Khambora. The primary data, which cover the years 2022–2023, were gathered using a straightforward random sample technique. As a result of input usage, the group with a high adoption level utilized the most human labor. All three categories had seed rates, resistant variety usage at the indicated level, and sowing times that were closer to the recommended level. Farmyard manure, at 30.68 quintals per hectare, is most commonly used in the high adopter category. This is followed by medium adopters (16.80 q/ha) and low adopters (14.05 q/ha). The results of applying fertilizer (NPK) indicate that more was applied in all three categories at the recommended level. The highest per hectare yield, 16.64 quintals, was recorded by the high adopter group, followed by 14.01 quintals for the medium adopter group, and 12.71 quintals for the low adopter group. The net returns at Costs "A1," "B2," and "C2" were in the high adopter category, with amounts of Rs. 76557.94/-, Rs. 59781.64/-, and Rs. 50163.47/-. For low, medium, and high adopters, the input-output ratios at cost "A1" were 1.95, 2.05, and 2.27, respectively, but the input-output ratios at cost "C2" were 1.36, 1.43, and 1.58 for these same adopters. High adopter farmers saved Rs. 599.58 and Rs. 854.32/-per quintal at Costs "A1" and "C2" as a result of the per unit cost decrease. IPM technology was discovered to make cotton farming profitable because it reduced the cost of plant protection measures while simultaneously increasing yield. As a result, all cotton growers need to employ IPM technology more widely.
根据印度马哈拉施特拉邦阿库拉的 PDKV 博士的建议,评估病虫害综合防治技术对棉花作物成本效益的影响
由于棉花是维达尔巴地区主要的商业种植作物,PDKV Akola 博士开展并推荐了当前的研究,该研究有几个目标,包括确定棉花生产在多大程度上采用了所推荐的技术,研究在不同程度上采用虫害综合防治技术时棉花的投入利用率,计算在不同程度上采用虫害综合防治技术时棉花的成本效益和利润率,以及分析采用技术的障碍。研究地点位于马哈拉施特拉邦维达巴地区的阿科拉县和布尔达纳县。从这两个地区选取了三个村庄--阿科拉(Akola)、阿科特(Akot)和桑格拉姆普尔(Sangrampur),并从这些村庄中选取了 120 名农民,即瓦尔瓦特-坎德劳(Varvat Khanderao)、希罗达(Khiiroda)、桑格拉姆普尔(Sangrampur)、兰姆哈布尔(Rambhapur)、曼德拉(Mandala)、金赫德-普尔纳(Kinkhed Purna)和坎博拉(Khambora)。采用直接随机抽样技术收集了 2022-2023 年的原始数据。从投入使用情况来看,采用率高的小组使用的人力最多。所有三类作物的种子率、抗性品种使用率都达到了指定水平,播种时间也更接近建议水平。高采用率组最常使用农家肥,每公顷 30.68 英担。其次是中等采用者(16.80 英担/公顷)和低采用者(14.05 英担/公顷)。施肥(氮磷钾)的结果表明,所有三个类别的施肥量都高于建议水平。高采用率组的每公顷产量最高,为 16.64 英担,其次是中采用率组的 14.01 英担和低采用率组的 12.71 英担。成本 "A1"、"B2 "和 "C2 "的净收益属于高采用组,分别为 76557.94 卢比/-、59781.64 卢比/-和 50163.47 卢比/-。对于低、中、高采用者,成本 "A1 "的投入产出比分别为 1.95、2.05 和 2.27,但对于这些采用者,成本 "C2 "的投入产出比分别为 1.36、1.43 和 1.58。在成本 "A1 "和 "C2 "下,由于单位成本下降,采用率高的农民每公担分别节省了 599.58 卢比和 854.32 卢比。虫害综合防治技术降低了植保措施的成本,同时又提高了产量,因此棉花种植有利可图。因此,所有棉花种植者都需要更广泛地采用虫害综合防治技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书