Driving Forces of Impunity in South Asia: A Human Rights Framework

P. Khatiwada, D. Adhikari
{"title":"Driving Forces of Impunity in South Asia: A Human Rights Framework","authors":"P. Khatiwada, D. Adhikari","doi":"10.3126/mef.v14i01.67922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the outcome of a research on impunity in South Asia. Undertaken by Forum Asia in 2021, the research collected cases from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The cases related to impunity were collected by the country researchers deputed in these countries. The lead author and co-author of this paper were the main contributors in compiling the country reports, processing the data, editing them and publishing them as country reports and South Asia regional report. Out of the huge compilation, this paper mainly sketches the debates over the constructs on impunity prevailing in these countries. The paper highlights how these countries are combating impunity with respect to the drivers and to what extent this effort is compatible in the realm of global human rights framework. Impunity is found deeply rooted in South Asia both in the cognitive, productive, economic, and political lives of the victims as well as on the psychosocial mindset of society. Individual victims of gross violations of human rights have been denied access to justice at large. This develops post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) along with loss of memory, nightmares, excessive fear, loss of attention, loss of self-esteem, self-isolation, distrust, withdrawal from normal life events as well as a refusal to participate in civil, cultural and social interactions. The paper concludes that most South Asian states follow democratic norms and values as they hold periodic elections and form governments. These states, however, severely lack concrete plans and tools to combat impunity. The paper suggests the vibrant role of the legislation penal codes in these countries to make accountable to the stakeholders involved in impunity matters both as perpetrators and those acting against the perpetrators.","PeriodicalId":488641,"journal":{"name":"Molung educational frontier","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molung educational frontier","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mef.v14i01.67922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is the outcome of a research on impunity in South Asia. Undertaken by Forum Asia in 2021, the research collected cases from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The cases related to impunity were collected by the country researchers deputed in these countries. The lead author and co-author of this paper were the main contributors in compiling the country reports, processing the data, editing them and publishing them as country reports and South Asia regional report. Out of the huge compilation, this paper mainly sketches the debates over the constructs on impunity prevailing in these countries. The paper highlights how these countries are combating impunity with respect to the drivers and to what extent this effort is compatible in the realm of global human rights framework. Impunity is found deeply rooted in South Asia both in the cognitive, productive, economic, and political lives of the victims as well as on the psychosocial mindset of society. Individual victims of gross violations of human rights have been denied access to justice at large. This develops post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) along with loss of memory, nightmares, excessive fear, loss of attention, loss of self-esteem, self-isolation, distrust, withdrawal from normal life events as well as a refusal to participate in civil, cultural and social interactions. The paper concludes that most South Asian states follow democratic norms and values as they hold periodic elections and form governments. These states, however, severely lack concrete plans and tools to combat impunity. The paper suggests the vibrant role of the legislation penal codes in these countries to make accountable to the stakeholders involved in impunity matters both as perpetrators and those acting against the perpetrators.
南亚有罪不罚现象的驱动力:人权框架
本文是南亚有罪不罚现象研究的成果。该研究由亚洲论坛于 2021 年开展,收集了阿富汗、孟加拉国、印度、马尔代夫、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡的案例。与有罪不罚现象有关的案例是由派驻这些国家的国家研究人员收集的。本文的主要作者和合著者是汇编国家报告、处理数据、编辑并将其作为国家报告和南亚地区报告出版的主要贡献者。在大量的汇编工作中,本文主要概述了这些国家对有罪不罚现象的普遍看法。本文重点介绍了这些国家如何打击有罪不罚现象的驱动因素,以及这种努力在多大程度上符合全球人权框架。在南亚,有罪不罚现象在受害者的认知、生产、经济和政治生活以及社会心理方面都根深蒂固。严重侵犯人权行为的受害者个人被普遍剥夺了诉诸司法的机会。这导致了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),并伴有记忆丧失、噩梦、过度恐惧、注意力不集中、自尊心丧失、自我封闭、不信任、退出正常生活活动以及拒绝参与公民、文化和社会交往。本文的结论是,大多数南亚国家都遵循民主准则和价值观,定期举行选举并组建政府。然而,这些国家严重缺乏打击有罪不罚现象的具体计划和工具。本文建议,这些国家的立法刑法应发挥重要作用,使参与有罪不罚问题的利益攸关方(包括犯罪者和对犯罪者采取行动的利益攸关方)承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信