Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
T. Soffer, Anat Cohen
{"title":"Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education","authors":"T. Soffer, Anat Cohen","doi":"10.14742/ajet.9130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid recent use of learning analytics (LA) in higher education, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic, allows the monitoring of users' behavior while learning. Using LA may promote students' learning outcomes but also intrude into their privacy. This study aimed to explore students’ behaviour and perceptions towards privacy and data protection when using LA for pedagogical needs, examine the privacy trade-off of students' willingness to share personal information in exchange for pedagogical benefits and understand the predicting variables for this privacy trade-off. A model was developed containing five groups of influencing variables (demographic data, perceptions, feelings, behaviour and awareness) on the privacy trade-off. A total of 1,014 students completed an online questionnaire. The results found that students do care about their privacy but are not aware of privacy and data protection regulations. They are willing to trade off privacy for pedagogical benefits, and they trust their academic institutions, but they want transparency. Age, a sense of security in the academic institution, behaviour, data misuse concern and institution management of students' personal information are the significant predictors for a privacy trade-off. It is important to engage students in the process as they are the main beneficiaries of LA and build trust between them and the institution.\n \nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nAcademic institution should actively provide information to raise privacy awareness.\nAcademic institutions should engage students in the process of using LA to create a high degree of trust.\nUniversities should endorse LA policy, fostering it for pedagogical purposes.\nInstructors may utilise LA to enrich student learning, respecting their willingness to share pedagogical data.\nAcademic institutions should provide a high level of transparency in order to build students’ trust in their institutions.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid recent use of learning analytics (LA) in higher education, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic, allows the monitoring of users' behavior while learning. Using LA may promote students' learning outcomes but also intrude into their privacy. This study aimed to explore students’ behaviour and perceptions towards privacy and data protection when using LA for pedagogical needs, examine the privacy trade-off of students' willingness to share personal information in exchange for pedagogical benefits and understand the predicting variables for this privacy trade-off. A model was developed containing five groups of influencing variables (demographic data, perceptions, feelings, behaviour and awareness) on the privacy trade-off. A total of 1,014 students completed an online questionnaire. The results found that students do care about their privacy but are not aware of privacy and data protection regulations. They are willing to trade off privacy for pedagogical benefits, and they trust their academic institutions, but they want transparency. Age, a sense of security in the academic institution, behaviour, data misuse concern and institution management of students' personal information are the significant predictors for a privacy trade-off. It is important to engage students in the process as they are the main beneficiaries of LA and build trust between them and the institution.   Implications for practice or policy: Academic institution should actively provide information to raise privacy awareness. Academic institutions should engage students in the process of using LA to create a high degree of trust. Universities should endorse LA policy, fostering it for pedagogical purposes. Instructors may utilise LA to enrich student learning, respecting their willingness to share pedagogical data. Academic institutions should provide a high level of transparency in order to build students’ trust in their institutions.
隐私与教学法--学生对在高等教育中使用学习分析的看法
最近,特别是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,学习分析(LA)在高等教育中得到了迅速应用,可以监控用户在学习过程中的行为。使用学习分析可能会促进学生的学习成果,但也会侵犯他们的隐私。本研究旨在探讨学生在因教学需要使用实验室时对隐私和数据保护的行为和看法,研究学生愿意分享个人信息以换取教学利益的隐私权衡,并了解这种隐私权衡的预测变量。研究建立了一个模型,其中包含五组影响隐私权衡的变量(人口统计学数据、看法、感受、行为和意识)。共有 1 014 名学生完成了在线问卷调查。结果发现,学生确实关心自己的隐私,但并不了解隐私和数据保护法规。他们愿意用隐私换取教学上的好处,他们信任学术机构,但他们希望透明。年龄、对学术机构的安全感、行为、对数据滥用的担忧以及学术机构对学生个人信息的管理是预测隐私权取舍的重要因素。重要的是要让学生参与到这一过程中来,因为他们是 "LA "的主要受益者,并在他们和院校之间建立信任。对实践或政策的启示:学术机构应积极提供信息,以提高隐私意识。学术机构应让学生参与使用LA的过程,以建立高度信任。大学应认可LA政策,将其用于教学目的。教师可利用LA丰富学生的学习,尊重他们共享教学数据的意愿。学术机构应提供高透明度,以建立学生对其机构的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信