Exploring ethical considerations in AI-driven cataloguing and classification with ChatGPT

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Akinade Adebowale Adewojo, O. B. Amzat
{"title":"Exploring ethical considerations in AI-driven cataloguing and classification with ChatGPT","authors":"Akinade Adebowale Adewojo, O. B. Amzat","doi":"10.1177/02663821241264703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. This study investigates the ethical dimensions surrounding the use of AI-driven cataloguing and classification systems, exemplified by ChatGPT, in library sciences. The research aims to fill a gap in the existing literature by exploring privacy, accountability, transparency, and bias issues associated with these technologies. Design/Methodology/Approach. The study employs a comprehensive literature review to analyze the current landscape of AI applications in libraries, emphasizing ethical considerations. It also assesses existing guidelines from associations like ALA and IFLA, and explores privacy concerns, biases, and the impact on job satisfaction. Findings. The study identifies gaps in current ethical frameworks and emphasizes the need for guidelines to evolve with technological advancements. Privacy concerns, biases in AI outputs, and challenges related to user trust and transparency are highlighted. The impact of AI on job satisfaction for librarians is discussed, acknowledging both opportunities and challenges. Originality/Value. This study contributes to the broader discussion on ethical AI by specifically addressing the underexplored area of AI-driven cataloguing and classification systems. It underscores the importance of aligning AI use with ethical standards, proposing strategies for mitigating biases and fostering user trust.","PeriodicalId":39735,"journal":{"name":"Business Information Review","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821241264703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. This study investigates the ethical dimensions surrounding the use of AI-driven cataloguing and classification systems, exemplified by ChatGPT, in library sciences. The research aims to fill a gap in the existing literature by exploring privacy, accountability, transparency, and bias issues associated with these technologies. Design/Methodology/Approach. The study employs a comprehensive literature review to analyze the current landscape of AI applications in libraries, emphasizing ethical considerations. It also assesses existing guidelines from associations like ALA and IFLA, and explores privacy concerns, biases, and the impact on job satisfaction. Findings. The study identifies gaps in current ethical frameworks and emphasizes the need for guidelines to evolve with technological advancements. Privacy concerns, biases in AI outputs, and challenges related to user trust and transparency are highlighted. The impact of AI on job satisfaction for librarians is discussed, acknowledging both opportunities and challenges. Originality/Value. This study contributes to the broader discussion on ethical AI by specifically addressing the underexplored area of AI-driven cataloguing and classification systems. It underscores the importance of aligning AI use with ethical standards, proposing strategies for mitigating biases and fostering user trust.
利用 ChatGPT 探索人工智能驱动的编目和分类中的伦理问题
研究目的本研究调查了图书馆科学中使用人工智能驱动的编目和分类系统(以 ChatGPT 为例)的相关伦理问题。研究旨在通过探讨与这些技术相关的隐私、责任、透明度和偏见问题,填补现有文献的空白。设计/方法/途径。本研究采用全面的文献综述来分析图书馆人工智能应用的现状,强调伦理方面的考虑。研究还评估了 ALA 和 IFLA 等协会的现有指导方针,并探讨了隐私问题、偏见以及对工作满意度的影响。研究结果。研究发现了当前伦理框架中存在的差距,并强调指导方针需要随着技术进步而发展。研究还强调了隐私问题、人工智能产出中的偏见以及与用户信任和透明度相关的挑战。还讨论了人工智能对图书馆员工作满意度的影响,同时承认机遇与挑战并存。原创性/价值。本研究专门探讨了人工智能驱动的编目和分类系统这一尚未充分探索的领域,为有关人工智能伦理的广泛讨论做出了贡献。它强调了使人工智能的使用符合道德标准的重要性,提出了减少偏见和促进用户信任的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Information Review
Business Information Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Business Information Review (BIR) is concerned with information and knowledge management within organisations. To be successful organisations need to gain maximum value from exploiting relevant information and knowledge. BIR deals with information strategies and operational good practice across the range of activities required to deliver this information dividend. The journal aims to highlight developments in the economic, social and technological landscapes that will impact the way organisations operate. BIR also provides insights into the factors that contribute to individual professional success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信