A. Sahu, Abeka Selliah, Alaa Hassan, Moien Masoumi, Berker Bilgin
{"title":"Experimental Evaluation of Acoustical Materials for Noise Reduction in an Induction Motor Drive","authors":"A. Sahu, Abeka Selliah, Alaa Hassan, Moien Masoumi, Berker Bilgin","doi":"10.3390/machines12080499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric propulsion motors are more efficient than internal combustion engines, but they generate high-frequency tonal noise, which can be perceived as annoying. Acoustical materials are typically suitable for high-frequency noise, making them ideal for acoustic noise mitigation. This paper investigates the effectiveness of three acoustical materials, namely, 2″ Polyurethane foam, 2″ Vinyl-faced quilted glass fiber, and 2″ Studiofoam, in mitigating the acoustic noise from an induction motor and a variable frequency inverter. Acoustic noise rates at multiple motor speeds, with and without the application of acoustical materials, are compared to determine the effectiveness of acoustical materials in mitigating acoustic noise at the transmission stage. Acoustical materials reduce acoustic noise from the induction motor by 5–14 dB(A) at around 500 Hz and by 22–31 dB(A) at around 10,000 Hz. Among the tested materials, Studiofoam demonstrates superior noise absorption capacity across the entire frequency range. Polyurethane foam is a cost-effective and lightweight alternative, and it is equally as effective as Studifoam in mitigating high-frequency acoustic noise above 5000 Hz.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12080499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electric propulsion motors are more efficient than internal combustion engines, but they generate high-frequency tonal noise, which can be perceived as annoying. Acoustical materials are typically suitable for high-frequency noise, making them ideal for acoustic noise mitigation. This paper investigates the effectiveness of three acoustical materials, namely, 2″ Polyurethane foam, 2″ Vinyl-faced quilted glass fiber, and 2″ Studiofoam, in mitigating the acoustic noise from an induction motor and a variable frequency inverter. Acoustic noise rates at multiple motor speeds, with and without the application of acoustical materials, are compared to determine the effectiveness of acoustical materials in mitigating acoustic noise at the transmission stage. Acoustical materials reduce acoustic noise from the induction motor by 5–14 dB(A) at around 500 Hz and by 22–31 dB(A) at around 10,000 Hz. Among the tested materials, Studiofoam demonstrates superior noise absorption capacity across the entire frequency range. Polyurethane foam is a cost-effective and lightweight alternative, and it is equally as effective as Studifoam in mitigating high-frequency acoustic noise above 5000 Hz.