{"title":"Notes on a Fragment: Zarina’s Dividing Line","authors":"Aparna Kumar","doi":"10.1093/arthis/ulae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay provides a new reading of Zarina’s iconic woodcut print Dividing Line (2001), with an eye to unravelling the work’s relationship to the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent and the wider landscape of partition history. By considering Zarina’s use of paper, map and gouge, this reading argues that Dividing Line embodies a method and ethics of writing decolonial histories of partition, with important implications for how to understand and respond to the violent impact of postcolonial border-making on (art) history. The essay, written as a series of notes, seeks to account for the distinct forms and temporalities of writing for partition history that Dividing Line both produces and demands of the art historian. In its form, the essay mobilises the note as a fragmentary mode of writing, responsive to the specific dynamics of continuity and discontinuity endemic to the experience of lines, borders and partition in Dividing Line.","PeriodicalId":8456,"journal":{"name":"Art History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arthis/ulae015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay provides a new reading of Zarina’s iconic woodcut print Dividing Line (2001), with an eye to unravelling the work’s relationship to the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent and the wider landscape of partition history. By considering Zarina’s use of paper, map and gouge, this reading argues that Dividing Line embodies a method and ethics of writing decolonial histories of partition, with important implications for how to understand and respond to the violent impact of postcolonial border-making on (art) history. The essay, written as a series of notes, seeks to account for the distinct forms and temporalities of writing for partition history that Dividing Line both produces and demands of the art historian. In its form, the essay mobilises the note as a fragmentary mode of writing, responsive to the specific dynamics of continuity and discontinuity endemic to the experience of lines, borders and partition in Dividing Line.
期刊介绍:
Art History is a refereed journal that publishes essays and reviews on all aspects, areas and periods of the history of art, from a diversity of perspectives. Founded in 1978, it has established an international reputation for publishing innovative essays at the cutting edge of contemporary scholarship, whether on earlier or more recent periods. At the forefront of scholarly enquiry, Art History is opening up the discipline to new developments and to interdisciplinary and cross-cultural approaches.