Anesthesia Type Outcome in Severe Pre-eclampsia with Caesarean Section

Haitham Jaber Al Dallal, Bayan Thuban Al-Jobury
{"title":"Anesthesia Type Outcome in Severe Pre-eclampsia with Caesarean Section","authors":"Haitham Jaber Al Dallal, Bayan Thuban Al-Jobury","doi":"10.54133/ajms.v7i1.1067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder during pregnancy with fetomaternal mortality. The choice of anesthesia method for cesarean sections among preeclamptic women is still debated. Objective: To compare the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia in a cesarean section among preeclamptic women. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at Al-Imam Al-Sajjad Hospital/Al-Najaf Health Directorate from February 2021 to September 2023. Women undergoing cesarean sections due to severe preeclampsia were enrolled in the spinal or general anesthesia group. Data on maternal age, gestational age at delivery, parity, Apgar scores, maternal mortality and perinatal mortality were recorded. The background characteristics and outcomes were compared between both groups. We excluded women with mild preeclampsia, multiple pregnancies, other pregnancy medical disorders, gestational age < 32 weeks, cases of eclampsia, and general anesthesia following spinal anesthesia failure. Results: The general anesthesia group had a significantly lower Apgar score at 1 minute than the spinal anesthesia group (27.3% and 57.4%, p=0.006), and at 5 minutes (15.2% and 37.03%, p=0.005). The study groups showed no significant difference regarding maternal and perinatal mortality. Conclusions: Maternal and perinatal mortality were not affected by anesthesia type in severe preeclampsia, but general anesthesia caused a higher proportion of birth asphyxia.","PeriodicalId":105471,"journal":{"name":"Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )","volume":"132 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i1.1067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder during pregnancy with fetomaternal mortality. The choice of anesthesia method for cesarean sections among preeclamptic women is still debated. Objective: To compare the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia in a cesarean section among preeclamptic women. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at Al-Imam Al-Sajjad Hospital/Al-Najaf Health Directorate from February 2021 to September 2023. Women undergoing cesarean sections due to severe preeclampsia were enrolled in the spinal or general anesthesia group. Data on maternal age, gestational age at delivery, parity, Apgar scores, maternal mortality and perinatal mortality were recorded. The background characteristics and outcomes were compared between both groups. We excluded women with mild preeclampsia, multiple pregnancies, other pregnancy medical disorders, gestational age < 32 weeks, cases of eclampsia, and general anesthesia following spinal anesthesia failure. Results: The general anesthesia group had a significantly lower Apgar score at 1 minute than the spinal anesthesia group (27.3% and 57.4%, p=0.006), and at 5 minutes (15.2% and 37.03%, p=0.005). The study groups showed no significant difference regarding maternal and perinatal mortality. Conclusions: Maternal and perinatal mortality were not affected by anesthesia type in severe preeclampsia, but general anesthesia caused a higher proportion of birth asphyxia.
剖腹产重度子痫前期的麻醉类型结果
背景:子痫前期是一种妊娠期高血压疾病,会导致胎儿和产妇死亡。关于子痫前期妇女剖宫产的麻醉方法选择仍存在争议。研究目的比较子痫前期妇女剖宫产术中脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉的效果。方法:2021 年 2 月至 2023 年 9 月在 Al-Imam Al-Sajjad 医院/Al-Najaf 卫生局进行了一项前瞻性研究。因重度子痫前期而接受剖宫产手术的妇女被分为脊髓麻醉组和全身麻醉组。记录了产妇年龄、分娩时的胎龄、奇偶数、阿普加评分、产妇死亡率和围产期死亡率等数据。对两组产妇的背景特征和结果进行了比较。我们排除了轻度子痫前期、多胎妊娠、其他妊娠疾病、胎龄小于 32 周、子痫病例以及脊髓麻醉失败后进行全身麻醉的产妇。结果全身麻醉组在1分钟时的Apgar评分(27.3%和57.4%,P=0.006)和5分钟时的Apgar评分(15.2%和37.03%,P=0.005)明显低于脊髓麻醉组。各研究组在产妇和围产期死亡率方面无明显差异。结论重度子痫前期的产妇和围产儿死亡率不受麻醉类型的影响,但全身麻醉导致的分娩窒息比例较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信