DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Stool Samples: Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies

IF 3.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Floriana Porcaro, S. Voccola, G. Cardinale, Piercarmine Porcaro, Pasquale Vito
{"title":"DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Stool Samples: Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies","authors":"Floriana Porcaro, S. Voccola, G. Cardinale, Piercarmine Porcaro, Pasquale Vito","doi":"10.3389/or.2024.1408529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite efforts in prevention and early detection, CRC incidence and mortality rates are expected to rise substantially. Traditional screening methods like gFOBT, FIT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CTC, and colon capsule have limitations, including false positives/negatives, limited scope, or invasiveness. Recent developments in CRC screening involve DNA methylation biomarkers, showing promise in detecting early-stage CRC and precancerous lesions. Stool-based DNA testing is emerging as a noninvasive and convenient method for detecting CRC-associated DNA methylation alterations, offering potential for earlier detection compared to traditional methods. Several commercial stool-based DNA methylation tests targeting different genes associated with CRC have demonstrated varying sensitivity and specificity, some surpassing traditional screening methods. Challenges remain in optimizing their performance and accessibility. This review discusses how DNA methylation biomarkers could enhance CRC screening, and stool-based DNA methylation tests could revolutionize CRC screening practices, comparing them to the gold standard.","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2024.1408529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite efforts in prevention and early detection, CRC incidence and mortality rates are expected to rise substantially. Traditional screening methods like gFOBT, FIT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CTC, and colon capsule have limitations, including false positives/negatives, limited scope, or invasiveness. Recent developments in CRC screening involve DNA methylation biomarkers, showing promise in detecting early-stage CRC and precancerous lesions. Stool-based DNA testing is emerging as a noninvasive and convenient method for detecting CRC-associated DNA methylation alterations, offering potential for earlier detection compared to traditional methods. Several commercial stool-based DNA methylation tests targeting different genes associated with CRC have demonstrated varying sensitivity and specificity, some surpassing traditional screening methods. Challenges remain in optimizing their performance and accessibility. This review discusses how DNA methylation biomarkers could enhance CRC screening, and stool-based DNA methylation tests could revolutionize CRC screening practices, comparing them to the gold standard.
粪便样本中的 DNA 甲基化生物标记物:改进结直肠癌筛查策略
结肠直肠癌(CRC)是一项重大的全球健康挑战,是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。尽管在预防和早期检测方面做出了努力,但预计 CRC 的发病率和死亡率仍将大幅上升。传统的筛查方法,如 gFOBT、FIT、柔性乙状结肠镜检查、结肠镜检查、CTC 和结肠胶囊都有其局限性,包括假阳性/阴性、范围有限或有创性。癌症筛查的最新发展涉及 DNA 甲基化生物标记物,显示出检测早期癌症和癌前病变的前景。基于粪便的 DNA 检测正在成为一种无创、便捷的方法,用于检测与 CRC 相关的 DNA 甲基化改变,与传统方法相比,这种方法有可能更早地检测出 CRC。针对与 CRC 相关的不同基因的几种商用粪便 DNA 甲基化检测已显示出不同的灵敏度和特异性,其中一些已超过了传统筛查方法。在优化其性能和可及性方面仍存在挑战。本综述讨论了 DNA 甲基化生物标记物如何加强 CRC 筛查,以及基于粪便的 DNA 甲基化检测如何彻底改变 CRC 筛查方法,并将其与黄金标准进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Reviews
Oncology Reviews ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Oncology Reviews is a quarterly peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes authoritative state-of-the-art reviews on preclinical and clinical aspects of oncology. The journal will provide up-to-date information on the latest achievements in different fields of oncology for both practising clinicians and basic researchers. Oncology Reviews aims at being international in scope and readership, as reflected also by its Editorial Board, gathering the world leading experts in both pre-clinical research and everyday clinical practice. The journal is open for publication of supplements, monothematic issues and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信