EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LEBED METHOD THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION ON PHYSICAL STABILITY AMONG ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS IN KAKAMEGA COUNTY

Micky Olutende Oloo, E. Wamukoya, James Aggrey Oloo
{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LEBED METHOD THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION ON PHYSICAL STABILITY AMONG ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS IN KAKAMEGA COUNTY","authors":"Micky Olutende Oloo, E. Wamukoya, James Aggrey Oloo","doi":"10.37393/jass.2024.01.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In Kenya, falls among individuals over 60 years of age are a major concern. Despite physical activity being known to reduce fall risks, existing studies face challenges like high drop-out rates and limited exercise types. The Lebed Method, a dance program originally developed for breast cancer survivors by Sherry Lebed Davis, has shown potential to improve physical and emotional well-being. This study aimed to explore its effectiveness in improving physical stability among the elderly in Kakamega County. Methods. The study involved a community-based randomized control trial with 30 participants aged 60 and older, selected based on low social support scores. They were divided into intervention and control groups, meeting specific inclusion criteria. Baseline functional stability (mobility and balance) was assessed by Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores, gait speed time, and de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) score. To ensure the reliability of the study, biases such as selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting biases were addressed. Changes in physical stability between the groups were analyzed using the Analysis of Covariance, accounting for baseline differences, while within-group changes were evaluated using the dependent sample t-test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. The findings showed that the intervention group improved significantly in physical stability compared to the control group. Specifically, notable enhancements were observed on TUG times (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.53, d = 3.38), BBS scores (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.64, d = 1.97), gait speed (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.65, d = 1.99) and DEMMI score (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.38, d = 1.94). Conclusions. The intervention significantly improved mobility and balance among participants, demonstrating the effectiveness of the Lebed method for elderly individuals. Future research could explore specific components of dance-based therapy that contribute to functional mobility and balance improvements","PeriodicalId":34626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Sports Sciences","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37393/jass.2024.01.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. In Kenya, falls among individuals over 60 years of age are a major concern. Despite physical activity being known to reduce fall risks, existing studies face challenges like high drop-out rates and limited exercise types. The Lebed Method, a dance program originally developed for breast cancer survivors by Sherry Lebed Davis, has shown potential to improve physical and emotional well-being. This study aimed to explore its effectiveness in improving physical stability among the elderly in Kakamega County. Methods. The study involved a community-based randomized control trial with 30 participants aged 60 and older, selected based on low social support scores. They were divided into intervention and control groups, meeting specific inclusion criteria. Baseline functional stability (mobility and balance) was assessed by Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores, gait speed time, and de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) score. To ensure the reliability of the study, biases such as selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting biases were addressed. Changes in physical stability between the groups were analyzed using the Analysis of Covariance, accounting for baseline differences, while within-group changes were evaluated using the dependent sample t-test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. The findings showed that the intervention group improved significantly in physical stability compared to the control group. Specifically, notable enhancements were observed on TUG times (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.53, d = 3.38), BBS scores (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.64, d = 1.97), gait speed (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.65, d = 1.99) and DEMMI score (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.38, d = 1.94). Conclusions. The intervention significantly improved mobility and balance among participants, demonstrating the effectiveness of the Lebed method for elderly individuals. Future research could explore specific components of dance-based therapy that contribute to functional mobility and balance improvements
Lebed 法治疗干预对卡卡梅加县老年人身体稳定性的影响
背景。在肯尼亚,60 岁以上老年人跌倒是一个主要问题。尽管众所周知体育锻炼可以降低跌倒风险,但现有的研究面临着辍学率高和锻炼类型有限等挑战。莱贝德方法是雪莉-莱贝德-戴维斯(Sherry Lebed Davis)最初为乳腺癌幸存者开发的舞蹈项目,已显示出改善身心健康的潜力。本研究旨在探讨该方法在提高卡卡梅加县老年人身体稳定性方面的有效性。研究方法该研究是一项基于社区的随机对照试验,共有 30 名 60 岁及以上的参与者参加,他们都是根据较低的社会支持评分选出的。他们被分为干预组和对照组,均符合特定的纳入标准。基线功能稳定性(行动能力和平衡能力)通过定时起立行走(TUG)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)评分、步速时间和德莫顿行动能力指数(DEMMI)评分进行评估。为确保研究的可靠性,研究人员考虑了选择偏差、表现偏差、检测偏差、自然减员偏差和报告偏差等因素。在考虑基线差异的基础上,采用协方差分析法对各组间身体稳定性的变化进行分析,同时采用因果样本 t 检验法对组内变化进行评估。统计显著性的临界值设定为 p <0.05。结果研究结果表明,与对照组相比,干预组在身体稳定性方面有明显改善。具体而言,TUG 时间(p < .001,ηp2 = 0.53,d = 3.38)、BBS 评分(p < .001,ηp2 = 0.64,d = 1.97)、步速(p < .001,ηp2 = 0.65,d = 1.99)和 DEMMI 评分(p < .001,ηp2 = 0.38,d = 1.94)均有显著提高。结论干预措施明显改善了参与者的活动能力和平衡能力,证明了莱贝德方法对老年人的有效性。未来的研究可以探索舞蹈疗法中有助于改善活动能力和平衡能力的具体内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信