APPLYING THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AND INSTANT CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONFLICTS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATO's INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO AND THE 2023 ISRAEL-HAMAS CONFLICT

Kuan-Yu Chiu
{"title":"APPLYING THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AND INSTANT CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONFLICTS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATO's INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO AND THE 2023 ISRAEL-HAMAS CONFLICT","authors":"Kuan-Yu Chiu","doi":"10.37974/alf.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article delves into NATOs involvement in Kosovo and the 2023 Israel Hamas conflict, specifically looking at actions taken without approval from the UNSC. By examining the concepts of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Instant Customary International Law (ICIL), this analysis evaluates how these interventions align with changing norms and significance of opinio juris in establishing ICIL. The study investigates the applications and challenges associated with R2P and ICIL, suggesting alignment of UN Charter Article 103 with interventions lacking UNSC authorisation to prioritise rights over procedural requirements.","PeriodicalId":243475,"journal":{"name":"Amsterdam Law Forum","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsterdam Law Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37974/alf.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article delves into NATOs involvement in Kosovo and the 2023 Israel Hamas conflict, specifically looking at actions taken without approval from the UNSC. By examining the concepts of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Instant Customary International Law (ICIL), this analysis evaluates how these interventions align with changing norms and significance of opinio juris in establishing ICIL. The study investigates the applications and challenges associated with R2P and ICIL, suggesting alignment of UN Charter Article 103 with interventions lacking UNSC authorisation to prioritise rights over procedural requirements.
在冲突中适用保护责任和即时习惯国际法:北约对科索沃的干预与 2023 年以色列-哈马斯冲突的比较分析
本文深入探讨了北约在科索沃和 2023 年以色列-哈马斯冲突中的参与,特别是在未经联合国安理会批准的情况下采取的行动。通过研究 "保护的责任"(R2P)和 "即时习惯国际法"(ICIL)的概念,本分析评估了这些干预行动如何与不断变化的规范保持一致,以及法律确信在建立 ICIL 方面的意义。本研究调查了与保护责任和即时习惯国际法相关的应用和挑战,建议《联合国宪章》第一百零三条与缺乏联合国安理会授权的干预措施保持一致,将权利置于程序要求之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信