Extracurricular One Day Competitions in Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education – Theorising Effects

C. Brentnall
{"title":"Extracurricular One Day Competitions in Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education – Theorising Effects","authors":"C. Brentnall","doi":"10.1177/25151274241263048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes the popular but under-researched extracurricular format in school-based Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education - the one-day competition– as its focus. One-day competitions are frequently implemented in practice, with teachers’ surveys and national evaluations showing them to be the most common activity in schools. Yet one-day provision receives surprisingly little research attention in literature and implications of the competitive nature of activities are not meaningfully explored. More generally, current evaluation approaches in Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education tend to be measurement-focused, which obscures crucial differences - between students, schools and program experiences - behind reports of average effect sizes. In this study, the perspective and resources of Realist Evaluation are used to provide a holistic and comprehensive theorisation of experiences and effects in one-day competitions in secondary schools. The contribution of this approach is twofold. First, it provides a much-needed elaboration of what can happen in one-day competitions, developing foresight with which to think through how effects are generated for different students in different contexts. Second, by applying Realist Evaluation to explore a familiar enterprise and entrepreneurship activity, with regards to impact evaluation approaches, this study shows the usefulness of complementing measuring with thinking.","PeriodicalId":472238,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship education and pedagogy","volume":"53 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship education and pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274241263048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper takes the popular but under-researched extracurricular format in school-based Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education - the one-day competition– as its focus. One-day competitions are frequently implemented in practice, with teachers’ surveys and national evaluations showing them to be the most common activity in schools. Yet one-day provision receives surprisingly little research attention in literature and implications of the competitive nature of activities are not meaningfully explored. More generally, current evaluation approaches in Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education tend to be measurement-focused, which obscures crucial differences - between students, schools and program experiences - behind reports of average effect sizes. In this study, the perspective and resources of Realist Evaluation are used to provide a holistic and comprehensive theorisation of experiences and effects in one-day competitions in secondary schools. The contribution of this approach is twofold. First, it provides a much-needed elaboration of what can happen in one-day competitions, developing foresight with which to think through how effects are generated for different students in different contexts. Second, by applying Realist Evaluation to explore a familiar enterprise and entrepreneurship activity, with regards to impact evaluation approaches, this study shows the usefulness of complementing measuring with thinking.
企业和创业教育中的课外一日竞赛--效果理论化
本文以校本企业和创业教育中流行但研究不足的课外活动形式--一日竞赛--为研究重点。一日竞赛在实践中经常开展,教师调查和国家评估显示,一日竞赛是学校最常见的活动。然而,单日活动在文献中得到的研究关注却少得令人吃惊,活动的竞争性质所产生的影响也没有得到有意义的探讨。更普遍的是,目前企业与创业教育的评估方法往往以测量为重点,这就在平均效应大小的报告背后掩盖了学生、学校和项目经验之间的关键差异。在本研究中,现实主义评价的视角和资源被用来对中学一日竞赛的经验和效果进行整体和全面的理论分析。这种方法有两方面的贡献。首先,它对一日竞赛中可能发生的情况进行了亟需的阐述,培养了思考在不同情境下如何对不同学生产生影响的前瞻性。其次,本研究运用现实主义评价方法来探讨人们所熟悉的企业和创业活动的影响评价方 法,显示了用思考来补充衡量的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信