Use of Color Channel Optimization in 3D Heads-Up Vitrectomy vs Standard Operating Microscope for Macular Surgeries

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Aniruddha Agarwal, Nicola G. Ghazi, Ibraheem El Ghrably, Claudio Iovino, Enrico Peiretti, Yasmine Alcibahy, N. Menia, Jay K. Chhablani, Francesco Pichi, Dilraj S. Grewal
{"title":"Use of Color Channel Optimization in 3D Heads-Up Vitrectomy vs Standard Operating Microscope for Macular Surgeries","authors":"Aniruddha Agarwal, Nicola G. Ghazi, Ibraheem El Ghrably, Claudio Iovino, Enrico Peiretti, Yasmine Alcibahy, N. Menia, Jay K. Chhablani, Francesco Pichi, Dilraj S. Grewal","doi":"10.1177/24741264241263457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of color channel optimization with 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up vitrectomy (3D HUD group) vs standard operating microscope vitrectomy (control group) for macular surgery. Methods: This retrospective multicenter comparative study comprised patients having 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole, epiretinal membrane (ERM), or vitreomacular traction. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Surgeons completed a subjective questionnaire after each case. The main outcome measures were safety related (dye reinjection rate, macular ERM or internal limiting membrane [ILM] peeling time, endoillumination intensity). Other outcome measures included total surgical time, surgical outcomes, and subjective surgeon-related parameters. Results: The study included 74 eyes (36 in 3D HUD group; 38 in control group). There were no statistical differences in baseline parameters between groups. Significantly more eyes in the control group than in the 3D HUD group required dye reinjection (23.7% vs 5.6%; P = .03). Less time was required for ERM and ILM peeling in the 3D HUD group (both P < .01); however, the total surgical time was the same between groups. Eyes in the 3D HUD group required lower endoillumination ( P < .001). There were no between-group differences in the rates of complications. Surgeons said depth perception was better in the control group (P < .001), with no differences in comfort or visibility. Conclusions: 3D heads-up–based color channel optimization for macular surgeries is safe and effective. Although it may have safety advantages, it did not affect the visual or anatomic outcomes or total surgical time and did not improve surgeon comfort or visibility.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264241263457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of color channel optimization with 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up vitrectomy (3D HUD group) vs standard operating microscope vitrectomy (control group) for macular surgery. Methods: This retrospective multicenter comparative study comprised patients having 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole, epiretinal membrane (ERM), or vitreomacular traction. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Surgeons completed a subjective questionnaire after each case. The main outcome measures were safety related (dye reinjection rate, macular ERM or internal limiting membrane [ILM] peeling time, endoillumination intensity). Other outcome measures included total surgical time, surgical outcomes, and subjective surgeon-related parameters. Results: The study included 74 eyes (36 in 3D HUD group; 38 in control group). There were no statistical differences in baseline parameters between groups. Significantly more eyes in the control group than in the 3D HUD group required dye reinjection (23.7% vs 5.6%; P = .03). Less time was required for ERM and ILM peeling in the 3D HUD group (both P < .01); however, the total surgical time was the same between groups. Eyes in the 3D HUD group required lower endoillumination ( P < .001). There were no between-group differences in the rates of complications. Surgeons said depth perception was better in the control group (P < .001), with no differences in comfort or visibility. Conclusions: 3D heads-up–based color channel optimization for macular surgeries is safe and effective. Although it may have safety advantages, it did not affect the visual or anatomic outcomes or total surgical time and did not improve surgeon comfort or visibility.
在黄斑手术中使用三维平视玻璃体切除术与标准手术显微镜进行色彩通道优化对比
目的:比较在黄斑手术中使用三维(3D)平视玻璃体切除术(3D HUD 组)与标准手术显微镜玻璃体切除术(对照组)进行色道优化的有效性和安全性。方法:这项回顾性多中心比较研究的对象是因黄斑孔、视网膜外膜(ERM)或玻璃体粘膜牵引而接受25号镜玻璃体旁切除术的患者。最短随访时间为 6 个月。每例手术后,外科医生都会填写一份主观问卷。主要结果指标与安全性相关(染料再注射率、黄斑ERM或内限性膜[ILM]剥离时间、内照射强度)。其他结果指标包括手术总时间、手术结果以及与外科医生相关的主观参数。研究结果研究包括 74 只眼睛(3D HUD 组 36 只;对照组 38 只)。两组的基线参数无统计学差异。对照组中需要重新注射染料的眼睛明显多于 3D HUD 组(23.7% 对 5.6%;P = 0.03)。3D HUD 组 ERM 和 ILM 剥离所需的时间较少(P 均小于 0.01),但两组的总手术时间相同。3D HUD 组所需的内照射时间更短(P < .001)。组间并发症发生率无差异。外科医生表示,对照组的深度知觉更好(P < .001),舒适度和可视性没有差异。结论基于三维平视的黄斑手术颜色通道优化安全有效。虽然它可能具有安全优势,但它不会影响视觉或解剖结果或手术总时间,也不会提高外科医生的舒适度或可视度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信