Simulation study on the radioactive logging responses in the spiral borehole

IF 1.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Honggang Mi, Yunan Liang, Qiang Sun, Chao Wei, Hongwei Song, Quanying Zhang, Ningchao Li, Xin Nie
{"title":"Simulation study on the radioactive logging responses in the spiral borehole","authors":"Honggang Mi, Yunan Liang, Qiang Sun, Chao Wei, Hongwei Song, Quanying Zhang, Ningchao Li, Xin Nie","doi":"10.1093/jge/gxae078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The spiral borehole, primarily attributed to uneven force on the drill bit, poses a unique drilling and well logging challenge. In certain logging applications, this phenomenon can disrupt logging responses, introducing periodic fluctuations in the logging curve and complicating the interpretation process. To elucidate the impact of the spiral-borehole phenomenon on conventional radioactive logging methods, we conducted a simulation study examining its effects on traditional density tool (GGD), thermal-neutron porosity tool (TNP), and natural gamma tool (GR). Our findings reveal significant influences on density and porosity tool responses, with the amplitude of periodic fluctuations in logging curves closely linked to the groove depth of the spiral borehole. Conversely, the natural gamma tool exhibits minimal impact, with noticeable spiral-borehole effects causing limited fluctuations. Additionally, when the groove depth of the spiral borehole is fixed, the smaller the distance between the logging tool and the well wall, the closer the value obtained by the logging tool is to the true value of the formation parameter, and vice versa. This research offers theoretical insights for effectively correcting spiral-borehole effects in radioactive logging methods.","PeriodicalId":54820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spiral borehole, primarily attributed to uneven force on the drill bit, poses a unique drilling and well logging challenge. In certain logging applications, this phenomenon can disrupt logging responses, introducing periodic fluctuations in the logging curve and complicating the interpretation process. To elucidate the impact of the spiral-borehole phenomenon on conventional radioactive logging methods, we conducted a simulation study examining its effects on traditional density tool (GGD), thermal-neutron porosity tool (TNP), and natural gamma tool (GR). Our findings reveal significant influences on density and porosity tool responses, with the amplitude of periodic fluctuations in logging curves closely linked to the groove depth of the spiral borehole. Conversely, the natural gamma tool exhibits minimal impact, with noticeable spiral-borehole effects causing limited fluctuations. Additionally, when the groove depth of the spiral borehole is fixed, the smaller the distance between the logging tool and the well wall, the closer the value obtained by the logging tool is to the true value of the formation parameter, and vice versa. This research offers theoretical insights for effectively correcting spiral-borehole effects in radioactive logging methods.
螺旋钻孔放射性测井响应模拟研究
螺旋井眼主要是由于钻头受力不均造成的,给钻井和测井带来了独特的挑战。在某些测井应用中,这种现象会扰乱测井响应,在测井曲线中引入周期性波动,使解释过程复杂化。为了阐明螺旋井眼现象对传统放射性测井方法的影响,我们进行了一项模拟研究,考察其对传统密度仪器(GGD)、热中子孔隙度仪器(TNP)和天然伽马仪器(GR)的影响。我们的研究结果表明,密度和孔隙度仪器的响应受到很大影响,测井曲线周期性波动的幅度与螺旋井眼的槽深密切相关。相反,自然伽马仪器的影响很小,明显的螺旋井眼效应造成的波动有限。此外,当螺旋井眼的井槽深度固定时,测井仪器与井壁之间的距离越小,测井仪器获得的数值越接近地层参数的真实值,反之亦然。这项研究为有效纠正放射性测井方法中的螺旋井眼效应提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
87
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering aims to promote research and developments in geophysics and related areas of engineering. It has a predominantly applied science and engineering focus, but solicits and accepts high-quality contributions in all earth-physics disciplines, including geodynamics, natural and controlled-source seismology, oil, gas and mineral exploration, petrophysics and reservoir geophysics. The journal covers those aspects of engineering that are closely related to geophysics, or on the targets and problems that geophysics addresses. Typically, this is engineering focused on the subsurface, particularly petroleum engineering, rock mechanics, geophysical software engineering, drilling technology, remote sensing, instrumentation and sensor design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信