Contingent autonomy: Robotic encounters in an uncertain world

Shanti Sumartojo, Leimin Tian, Pamela Carreno-Medrano, Robert Lundberg, Dana Kulić, Michael Mintrom
{"title":"Contingent autonomy: Robotic encounters in an uncertain world","authors":"Shanti Sumartojo, Leimin Tian, Pamela Carreno-Medrano, Robert Lundberg, Dana Kulić, Michael Mintrom","doi":"10.1177/02637758241263206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we develop a framework for robotic autonomy as contingent. We do so with an account of a series of online research workshops that asked people to design and test robot behaviours for a public space scenario of their choice, as a means to surface and discuss their understandings of robots. We show how, as people manipulated robots in a simulator, they came to understand the capacities and limits of robots in distinctive ways. Thinking with these virtual encounters with robots, we argue that robotic contingency can be understood as dependent on spatial context; as unfolding in encounters between people, robots, and other things, creatures and substances; and as subject to forms of accountability and responsibility that are ongoingly made in an uncertain world. Our analysis reinforces work on automated infrastructures, which understands them as made sense of and operating relationally. This is important because those infrastructures are a part of how people understand robotic technologies in an uncertain and processual world, and they shape their expectations about and imagination of automated technologies, such as robots, into the future. We conclude by speculating on implications for an open-ended robotics design that works with contingency rather than seeking to control it, and ask how a more expansive understanding of accountability might be assembled as part of this more emergent approach.","PeriodicalId":504516,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","volume":"53 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241263206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we develop a framework for robotic autonomy as contingent. We do so with an account of a series of online research workshops that asked people to design and test robot behaviours for a public space scenario of their choice, as a means to surface and discuss their understandings of robots. We show how, as people manipulated robots in a simulator, they came to understand the capacities and limits of robots in distinctive ways. Thinking with these virtual encounters with robots, we argue that robotic contingency can be understood as dependent on spatial context; as unfolding in encounters between people, robots, and other things, creatures and substances; and as subject to forms of accountability and responsibility that are ongoingly made in an uncertain world. Our analysis reinforces work on automated infrastructures, which understands them as made sense of and operating relationally. This is important because those infrastructures are a part of how people understand robotic technologies in an uncertain and processual world, and they shape their expectations about and imagination of automated technologies, such as robots, into the future. We conclude by speculating on implications for an open-ended robotics design that works with contingency rather than seeking to control it, and ask how a more expansive understanding of accountability might be assembled as part of this more emergent approach.
权变自主:不确定世界中的机器人相遇
在这篇文章中,我们将为机器人的自主性制定一个框架,将其视为偶然因素。我们通过对一系列在线研究研讨会的描述来实现这一目的,这些研讨会要求人们在自己选择的公共空间场景中设计和测试机器人行为,以此来展示和讨论他们对机器人的理解。我们展示了当人们在模拟器中操纵机器人时,是如何以独特的方式理解机器人的能力和局限性的。通过思考这些与机器人的虚拟接触,我们认为,机器人的偶然性可以被理解为取决于空间环境;在人、机器人和其他事物、生物和物质的接触中展开;并且受制于在不确定世界中不断形成的问责和责任形式。我们的分析加强了有关自动化基础设施的研究,这些研究将自动化基础设施理解为是有意义的,并且是以关系的方式运行的。这一点非常重要,因为这些基础设施是人们在一个不确定和过程性的世界中如何理解机器人技术的一部分,它们塑造了人们对机器人等自动化技术未来的期望和想象。最后,我们推测了开放式机器人设计的意义,这种设计与突发事件合作,而不是寻求控制突发事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信