Rearing hogs on pasture minimally impacts pork composition

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Chelsea Becker, Jonathan Campbell, Kathy Soder, Elizabeth A Hines
{"title":"Rearing hogs on pasture minimally impacts pork composition","authors":"Chelsea Becker, Jonathan Campbell, Kathy Soder, Elizabeth A Hines","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Managing swine on pasture is increasing in popularity for both the consumer and producer. This interest appears to be driven by an effort to create an improved perception of environmentally sustainable practices and increased animal welfare, while keeping start-up costs low. However, evidence-based guidance on pasture management practices that support quality pork production and environmentally sustainable procedures are lacking. The objective of this work was to quantify the impact of pasture rearing on pig growth efficiency and pork quality. In this pilot study, twenty pigs similar in genetics, age, weight, and sex ratio were divided across Indoor (n = 10) and Outdoor (n = 10) housing environments. Pigs were weighed every fourteen days and harvested upon reaching an average weight of 113kg. Average starting body weights were similar between both groups (P = 0.98). Carcass quality was evaluated by measuring pH, loin eye area (LEA), back fat (BF) thickness, subjective color and marbling scores, and colorimetry (CIE color space (L*, a*, b*)) at the 10th rib. Final body weights at slaughter also showed no significant variation between housing groups (P = 0.98). No differences were observed in pork quality: pH 0h (P = 0.53), 6h (P = 0.29), 12h (P = 0.80), and 24h (P = 0.07) postmortem, LEA (P = 0.44), color (P = 0.73), and marbling (P = 0.40). However, hogs raised indoors had an increase in BF thickness (P = 0.04). Based on this pilot study, outdoor rearing conditions did not have significant impacts on pork quality. Further research will help to determine the impact that rearing scheme has on pH and back fat.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing swine on pasture is increasing in popularity for both the consumer and producer. This interest appears to be driven by an effort to create an improved perception of environmentally sustainable practices and increased animal welfare, while keeping start-up costs low. However, evidence-based guidance on pasture management practices that support quality pork production and environmentally sustainable procedures are lacking. The objective of this work was to quantify the impact of pasture rearing on pig growth efficiency and pork quality. In this pilot study, twenty pigs similar in genetics, age, weight, and sex ratio were divided across Indoor (n = 10) and Outdoor (n = 10) housing environments. Pigs were weighed every fourteen days and harvested upon reaching an average weight of 113kg. Average starting body weights were similar between both groups (P = 0.98). Carcass quality was evaluated by measuring pH, loin eye area (LEA), back fat (BF) thickness, subjective color and marbling scores, and colorimetry (CIE color space (L*, a*, b*)) at the 10th rib. Final body weights at slaughter also showed no significant variation between housing groups (P = 0.98). No differences were observed in pork quality: pH 0h (P = 0.53), 6h (P = 0.29), 12h (P = 0.80), and 24h (P = 0.07) postmortem, LEA (P = 0.44), color (P = 0.73), and marbling (P = 0.40). However, hogs raised indoors had an increase in BF thickness (P = 0.04). Based on this pilot study, outdoor rearing conditions did not have significant impacts on pork quality. Further research will help to determine the impact that rearing scheme has on pH and back fat.
在牧场饲养生猪对猪肉成分的影响微乎其微
对于消费者和生产者来说,在牧场上饲养猪越来越受欢迎。这种兴趣似乎是由于人们努力提高对环境可持续发展实践的认识,增加动物福利,同时保持较低的启动成本。然而,在支持优质猪肉生产和环境可持续程序的牧场管理实践方面,还缺乏循证指导。这项工作的目的是量化牧草饲养对猪生长效率和猪肉质量的影响。在这项试验研究中,20 头在遗传、年龄、体重和性别比例方面相似的猪被分养在室内(n = 10)和室外(n = 10)饲养环境中。每 14 天对猪称重一次,猪的平均体重达到 113 千克时收获。两组的起始平均体重相似(P = 0.98)。胴体质量是通过测量第 10 根肋骨处的 pH 值、腰眼面积 (LEA)、背脂厚度 (BF)、主观颜色和大理石纹评分以及比色法(CIE 颜色空间 (L*、a*、b*))进行评估的。屠宰时的最终体重在饲养组之间也无显著差异(P = 0.98)。在猪肉质量方面没有观察到差异:死后 0 小时 pH 值(P = 0.53)、6 小时 pH 值(P = 0.29)、12 小时 pH 值(P = 0.80)和 24 小时 pH 值(P = 0.07)、LEA(P = 0.44)、颜色(P = 0.73)和大理石纹(P = 0.40)。然而,室内饲养的猪的BF厚度有所增加(P = 0.04)。根据这项试验研究,室外饲养条件对猪肉质量没有显著影响。进一步的研究将有助于确定饲养方案对 pH 值和背脂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信