Impact of Different Land Use Types on Bacterial and Fungal Communities in a Typical Karst Depression in Southwestern China

Forests Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.3390/f15081299
Cong Hu, Zhonghua Zhang, Chaofang Zhong, Gang Hu, Chaohao Xu
{"title":"Impact of Different Land Use Types on Bacterial and Fungal Communities in a Typical Karst Depression in Southwestern China","authors":"Cong Hu, Zhonghua Zhang, Chaofang Zhong, Gang Hu, Chaohao Xu","doi":"10.3390/f15081299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the land use pattern relationships regarding the composition, diversity, and abundance of soil microbial communities in a typical karst depression in southwestern China is crucial for assessing the stability of local karst ecosystems. However, these aspects in typical karst depressions within northern tropical karst seasonal rainforests in China remain limited. Therefore, we examined the differences in soil microorganism abundance, diversity, community composition, and co-occurrence networks under five land use types in a tropical karst region in southwestern China: sugarcane fields, orchards, grasslands, plantation forests, and secondary forests. The soil microbial communities of samples from these areas were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplification. The abundances of Acidobacteria and Ascomycota were lowest (20.66% and 66.55%, respectively) in secondary forests and highest (35.59% and 89.35%, respectively) in sugarcane fields. Differences in microbial abundance across land use types were related to soil pH and total phosphorus. PCoA and ANOSIM demonstrated significant differences in soil bacterial and fungal community structures among the five land use types. Bacterial alpha-diversity showed no significant variation among the different land uses, whereas fungal alpha-diversity exhibited significant differences. Observed Chao1, ACE, and Shannon indices indicated that secondary forests had the highest fungal alpha-diversity. Land use changes also influenced bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks, with the networks in secondary forests, plantation forests, and orchards being more complex and stable than those in grasslands and sugarcane fields. Key taxa such as Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Chloroflexi, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota were predominantly connected within the co-occurrence networks, highlighting their high functional potential. This study provides insights that can inform more effective land use planning and management strategies in karst depressions, thereby enhancing ecological sustainability and balance.","PeriodicalId":505742,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the land use pattern relationships regarding the composition, diversity, and abundance of soil microbial communities in a typical karst depression in southwestern China is crucial for assessing the stability of local karst ecosystems. However, these aspects in typical karst depressions within northern tropical karst seasonal rainforests in China remain limited. Therefore, we examined the differences in soil microorganism abundance, diversity, community composition, and co-occurrence networks under five land use types in a tropical karst region in southwestern China: sugarcane fields, orchards, grasslands, plantation forests, and secondary forests. The soil microbial communities of samples from these areas were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplification. The abundances of Acidobacteria and Ascomycota were lowest (20.66% and 66.55%, respectively) in secondary forests and highest (35.59% and 89.35%, respectively) in sugarcane fields. Differences in microbial abundance across land use types were related to soil pH and total phosphorus. PCoA and ANOSIM demonstrated significant differences in soil bacterial and fungal community structures among the five land use types. Bacterial alpha-diversity showed no significant variation among the different land uses, whereas fungal alpha-diversity exhibited significant differences. Observed Chao1, ACE, and Shannon indices indicated that secondary forests had the highest fungal alpha-diversity. Land use changes also influenced bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks, with the networks in secondary forests, plantation forests, and orchards being more complex and stable than those in grasslands and sugarcane fields. Key taxa such as Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Chloroflexi, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota were predominantly connected within the co-occurrence networks, highlighting their high functional potential. This study provides insights that can inform more effective land use planning and management strategies in karst depressions, thereby enhancing ecological sustainability and balance.
不同土地利用类型对中国西南典型喀斯特洼地细菌和真菌群落的影响
了解中国西南典型喀斯特洼地土壤微生物群落的组成、多样性和丰度与土地利用模式的关系,对于评估当地喀斯特生态系统的稳定性至关重要。然而,中国北部热带岩溶季雨林典型岩溶洼地在这些方面的研究仍然有限。因此,我们研究了中国西南热带岩溶地区甘蔗田、果园、草地、人工林和次生林五种土地利用类型下土壤微生物丰度、多样性、群落组成和共生网络的差异。利用 16S rRNA 基因扩增技术分析了这些地区样本中的土壤微生物群落。在次生林中,酸细菌和子囊菌的丰度最低(分别为 20.66% 和 66.55%),而在甘蔗田中则最高(分别为 35.59% 和 89.35%)。不同土地利用类型的微生物丰度差异与土壤 pH 值和总磷有关。PCoA 和 ANOSIM 表明,五种土地利用类型的土壤细菌和真菌群落结构存在显著差异。细菌的α-多样性在不同土地利用类型之间没有显著差异,而真菌的α-多样性则有显著差异。观察到的 Chao1、ACE 和香农指数表明,次生林的真菌阿尔法多样性最高。土地利用的变化也影响了细菌和真菌的共生网络,次生林、人工林和果园中的共生网络比草地和甘蔗田中的共生网络更加复杂和稳定。在共生网络中,主要分类群(如变形菌门、平面菌门、绿霉菌门、子囊菌门和担子菌门)之间的联系十分紧密,这表明它们具有很高的功能潜力。这项研究提供的见解可为岩溶洼地更有效的土地利用规划和管理策略提供依据,从而提高生态的可持续性和平衡性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信