Antibody-drug Conjugates in Cancer Treatment: An Overview

Nikita Gupta, L. S. Geethika, Payavula Sneha
{"title":"Antibody-drug Conjugates in Cancer Treatment: An Overview","authors":"Nikita Gupta, L. S. Geethika, Payavula Sneha","doi":"10.9734/jcti/2024/v14i3259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has significantly impacted cancer therapy, progressing from foundational discoveries in the late 19th century to contemporary clinical applications. With the approval of the first ADC in 2000 and subsequent advancements, including over 30 ADCs in advanced clinical development, the therapeutic landscape for cancer patients has undergone a notable transformation. From initial cleavable linker technologies to the latest third-generation ADCs, continuous innovation in ADC design has been evident. Novel conjugation and linker technologies, alongside the identification of specific target antigens in solid cancers, have reinvigorated prospects for treating challenging malignancies. However, challenges such as off-target toxicity and heterogeneous antigen expression persist. The prevailing empirical approach to systemic cancer therapy administration presents challenges, including potential under-treatment of aggressive disease and over-treatment of indolent conditions, along with frequent adverse effects. Robust prognostic markers are essential to differentiate disease aggressiveness levels, guide treatment decisions, and anticipate adverse effects. Companion diagnostics for targeted therapies, such as HER-2 status for trastuzumab in breast cancer and BCR–ABL mutations for imatinib resistance in CML, enable personalized treatment strategies. Similarly, BRCA mutations predict response to PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancers, while BRAF mutations guide treatment with BRAF inhibitors in melanoma. Patient selection strategies for clinical trials involving ADCs rely on prospective selection or retrospective analysis, each with its merits and challenges.","PeriodicalId":509152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer and Tumor International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jcti/2024/v14i3259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has significantly impacted cancer therapy, progressing from foundational discoveries in the late 19th century to contemporary clinical applications. With the approval of the first ADC in 2000 and subsequent advancements, including over 30 ADCs in advanced clinical development, the therapeutic landscape for cancer patients has undergone a notable transformation. From initial cleavable linker technologies to the latest third-generation ADCs, continuous innovation in ADC design has been evident. Novel conjugation and linker technologies, alongside the identification of specific target antigens in solid cancers, have reinvigorated prospects for treating challenging malignancies. However, challenges such as off-target toxicity and heterogeneous antigen expression persist. The prevailing empirical approach to systemic cancer therapy administration presents challenges, including potential under-treatment of aggressive disease and over-treatment of indolent conditions, along with frequent adverse effects. Robust prognostic markers are essential to differentiate disease aggressiveness levels, guide treatment decisions, and anticipate adverse effects. Companion diagnostics for targeted therapies, such as HER-2 status for trastuzumab in breast cancer and BCR–ABL mutations for imatinib resistance in CML, enable personalized treatment strategies. Similarly, BRCA mutations predict response to PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancers, while BRAF mutations guide treatment with BRAF inhibitors in melanoma. Patient selection strategies for clinical trials involving ADCs rely on prospective selection or retrospective analysis, each with its merits and challenges.
癌症治疗中的抗体药物共轭物:概述
抗体药物结合体(ADC)的发展对癌症治疗产生了重大影响,从 19 世纪末的基础发现发展到当代的临床应用。随着第一种 ADC 于 2000 年获得批准以及随后取得的进展(包括 30 多种处于后期临床开发阶段的 ADC),癌症患者的治疗格局发生了显著变化。从最初的可裂解连接体技术到最新的第三代 ADC,ADC 设计的不断创新有目共睹。新型共轭和连接体技术以及实体瘤特异性靶抗原的确定,为治疗具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤带来了新的希望。然而,脱靶毒性和抗原表达异质性等挑战依然存在。目前对全身性癌症治疗采用的经验性方法也带来了挑战,包括可能对侵袭性疾病治疗不足,对轻度疾病治疗过度,以及频繁出现的不良反应。可靠的预后标志物对于区分疾病的侵袭程度、指导治疗决策和预测不良反应至关重要。靶向治疗的辅助诊断,如乳腺癌曲妥珠单抗的 HER-2 状态和慢性骨髓性白血病伊马替尼耐药的 BCR-ABL 基因突变,可实现个性化治疗策略。同样,BRCA 基因突变可预测乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者对 PARP 抑制剂的反应,而 BRAF 基因突变则可指导黑色素瘤患者使用 BRAF 抑制剂进行治疗。ADC 临床试验的患者选择策略取决于前瞻性选择或回顾性分析,每种策略都有其优点和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信