{"title":"Anatomy of the sonnet \"Don Juan\" by N. S. Gumilev","authors":"Y. Pogrebnaya","doi":"10.30853/phil20240345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to establish the concept of the image of Don Juan in the works of N. S. Gumilev through the prism of affirming and clarifying the aesthetics of acmeism and the dynamics of the poet's axiology and ontology. The scientific novelty of this research lies in two main aspects: firstly, we identify the image of Don Juan in N. S. Gumilev's work and place it in the context of various interpretations of the eternal image; secondly, we apply the methodology of level analysis of a poem, which was proposed by Gumilev himself in his article \"Anatomy of a Poem,\" to our interpretation of the eternal image in the sonnet \"Don Juan.\" This approach serves as a starting point for further readings of the image in other forms of literature, such as lyrics, drama (in the case of \"Don Juan in Egypt\"), and journalism (as seen in \"The Reader\"). The mythological genesis of the image of Don Juan actualizes the diachronic decoding of archaic meanings in the interpretation of N. S. Gumilev, which are harmoniously embedded in the architecture of the classical sonnet. At the same time, Don Juan, in accordance with the role concept of the collection \"Pearls\", acts as one of the hypostases of a person in general, which dictates the need for an ethical assessment of the hero's life path. As a result of the study, it was found that the grammatical structure and poetic language of the sonnet \"Don Juan\" form the concept of an image polemically opposed to both the romantic rehabilitation of Don Juan and his acmeistic interpretation in the one-act drama in verse \"Don Juan in Egypt\".","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to establish the concept of the image of Don Juan in the works of N. S. Gumilev through the prism of affirming and clarifying the aesthetics of acmeism and the dynamics of the poet's axiology and ontology. The scientific novelty of this research lies in two main aspects: firstly, we identify the image of Don Juan in N. S. Gumilev's work and place it in the context of various interpretations of the eternal image; secondly, we apply the methodology of level analysis of a poem, which was proposed by Gumilev himself in his article "Anatomy of a Poem," to our interpretation of the eternal image in the sonnet "Don Juan." This approach serves as a starting point for further readings of the image in other forms of literature, such as lyrics, drama (in the case of "Don Juan in Egypt"), and journalism (as seen in "The Reader"). The mythological genesis of the image of Don Juan actualizes the diachronic decoding of archaic meanings in the interpretation of N. S. Gumilev, which are harmoniously embedded in the architecture of the classical sonnet. At the same time, Don Juan, in accordance with the role concept of the collection "Pearls", acts as one of the hypostases of a person in general, which dictates the need for an ethical assessment of the hero's life path. As a result of the study, it was found that the grammatical structure and poetic language of the sonnet "Don Juan" form the concept of an image polemically opposed to both the romantic rehabilitation of Don Juan and his acmeistic interpretation in the one-act drama in verse "Don Juan in Egypt".
本研究的目的是通过肯定和澄清阿克梅主义美学以及诗人公理和本体论动态的棱镜,在尼-斯-古米列夫的作品中确立唐璜形象的概念。本研究的科学新颖性主要体现在两个方面:首先,我们确定了 N. S. 古米列夫作品中的 "唐璜 "形象,并将其置于对永恒形象的各种解释的背景中;其次,我们将古米列夫本人在其文章 "诗歌解剖 "中提出的诗歌层次分析方法应用于我们对十四行诗 "唐璜 "中永恒形象的解释。这种方法是进一步解读其他文学形式中的形象的起点,如歌词、戏剧(如《唐璜在埃及》)和新闻(如《读者》)。唐璜形象的神话起源在 N. S. Gumilev 的阐释中实现了古义的非同步解码,这些古义和谐地嵌入了古典十四行诗的架构中。同时,根据《珍珠》一书中的角色概念,《唐璜》是一般人的假面之一,这就决定了需要对主人公的人生道路进行伦理评估。研究结果发现,十四行诗 "唐璜 "的语法结构和诗歌语言构成了一个形象概念,与诗体独幕剧 "唐璜在埃及 "中对唐璜的浪漫主义改造和尖刻主义诠释形成了对立。