Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in community-acquired pneumonia: Diagnostic potential and its limitations in the COVID era

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Ritika Abrol, Sohaib Ahmed, R. Khanduri
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in community-acquired pneumonia: Diagnostic potential and its limitations in the COVID era","authors":"Ritika Abrol, Sohaib Ahmed, R. Khanduri","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1940_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n To determine the diagnostic potential of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a POC marker to discriminate tuberculous from non-tuberculous CAP and identify limitations if any at a tertiary care centre in Uttarakhand, India.\n \n \n \n 225 patients presenting with respiratory complaints were recruited from the General Medicine clinics and investigated. NLR was noted at onset and correlated with final diagnosis.\n \n \n \n NLR from both groups did not exhibit a statistically significant difference. The area under curve (AUC) exhibited an accuracy of 49.1% in differentiating tuberculous from non-tubercular CAP, and an anomalous effect of prior steroid exposure on NLR was noted as a limitation.\n \n \n \n The disparity of our results from previous studies warranted a review of literature which rendered a significant limitation of NLR. The NLR is affected by catecholamines, which makes the marker unreliable in patients with exogenous steroid exposure. This was not noted in the previous studies. We presume indiscriminate steroid usage in the pandemic confounded our findings. We propose that this limitation be accounted for in future studies so that NLR’s true utility may be identified.\n","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1940_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT To determine the diagnostic potential of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a POC marker to discriminate tuberculous from non-tuberculous CAP and identify limitations if any at a tertiary care centre in Uttarakhand, India. 225 patients presenting with respiratory complaints were recruited from the General Medicine clinics and investigated. NLR was noted at onset and correlated with final diagnosis. NLR from both groups did not exhibit a statistically significant difference. The area under curve (AUC) exhibited an accuracy of 49.1% in differentiating tuberculous from non-tubercular CAP, and an anomalous effect of prior steroid exposure on NLR was noted as a limitation. The disparity of our results from previous studies warranted a review of literature which rendered a significant limitation of NLR. The NLR is affected by catecholamines, which makes the marker unreliable in patients with exogenous steroid exposure. This was not noted in the previous studies. We presume indiscriminate steroid usage in the pandemic confounded our findings. We propose that this limitation be accounted for in future studies so that NLR’s true utility may be identified.
社区获得性肺炎中的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率:COVID 时代的诊断潜力及其局限性
摘要 目的 在印度北阿坎德邦的一家三级医疗中心,确定中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为 POC 标志的诊断潜力,以区分结核性和非结核性 CAP,并找出可能存在的局限性。 该中心从全科诊所招募了 225 名出现呼吸道不适的患者,并对他们进行了调查。患者发病时的 NLR 值与最终诊断结果相关。 两组患者的 NLR 在统计学上没有显著差异。在区分结核性和非结核性 CAP 方面,曲线下面积(AUC)的准确率为 49.1%,而先前类固醇暴露对 NLR 的异常影响被认为是一个限制因素。 我们的研究结果与之前的研究结果存在差异,因此有必要对文献进行回顾,从而发现 NLR 存在很大的局限性。NLR 受儿茶酚胺的影响,这使得该指标在有外源性类固醇暴露的患者中不可靠。以往的研究并未注意到这一点。我们推测大流行病中类固醇的滥用混淆了我们的研究结果。我们建议在今后的研究中考虑到这一局限性,以确定 NLR 的真正用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信