Management of intractable epistaxis in a tertiary care referral hospital: an observational study

Sanjeev Mohanty, Sudha Balasubramanian, Bulu Nahak, Chimay Sundaray, Sejal Mehta
{"title":"Management of intractable epistaxis in a tertiary care referral hospital: an observational study","authors":"Sanjeev Mohanty, Sudha Balasubramanian, Bulu Nahak, Chimay Sundaray, Sejal Mehta","doi":"10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20242041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of sphenopalatine artery ligation/ cauterisation as a surgical intervention in control of refractory epistaxis and achieving haemostasis.\nMethods: The study was done with patients in the Department of ENT, Head and Neck surgery Health care hospital and out station referrals from institution’s outreach clinics, for a period of 2 years (May 2020-April 2022).  Patients with recurrent epistaxis, not controlled by digital pressure, anterior packing (ribbon gauze/ merocele) or postnasal packing were taken up for emergency endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterisation under general anaesthesia. Effectiveness of this technique was established by routine endoscopic follow up of these patients over a period of 6 months post procedure.  \nResults: Out of a total of 55 patients who presented with recurrent epistaxis, 8 patients settled down with conservative management (digital pressure/external ice pack application), 18 patients settled down with anterior nasal packing, 12 patients settled down with anterior and posterior nasal packing and 17 patients required sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterization. None of these postop patients had any further episodes of nasal bleed.\nConclusions: Sphenopalatine artery ligation has proven to be an effective measure in control of intractable refractory epistaxis when compared to therapeutic embolization or other procedures.","PeriodicalId":14350,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20242041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of sphenopalatine artery ligation/ cauterisation as a surgical intervention in control of refractory epistaxis and achieving haemostasis. Methods: The study was done with patients in the Department of ENT, Head and Neck surgery Health care hospital and out station referrals from institution’s outreach clinics, for a period of 2 years (May 2020-April 2022).  Patients with recurrent epistaxis, not controlled by digital pressure, anterior packing (ribbon gauze/ merocele) or postnasal packing were taken up for emergency endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterisation under general anaesthesia. Effectiveness of this technique was established by routine endoscopic follow up of these patients over a period of 6 months post procedure.   Results: Out of a total of 55 patients who presented with recurrent epistaxis, 8 patients settled down with conservative management (digital pressure/external ice pack application), 18 patients settled down with anterior nasal packing, 12 patients settled down with anterior and posterior nasal packing and 17 patients required sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterization. None of these postop patients had any further episodes of nasal bleed. Conclusions: Sphenopalatine artery ligation has proven to be an effective measure in control of intractable refractory epistaxis when compared to therapeutic embolization or other procedures.
一家三级转诊医院对顽固性鼻衄的处理:一项观察研究
背景:本研究的目的是评估椎动脉结扎/烧灼术作为外科干预手段在控制难治性鼻衄和止血方面的有效性:本研究的目的是评估椎动脉结扎/烧灼术作为外科干预措施在控制难治性鼻衄和止血方面的有效性:研究对象为耳鼻喉科、头颈外科保健医院的患者以及该机构外展诊所的外站转诊患者,为期两年(2020年5月至2022年4月)。 对数字加压、鼻前填塞(带状纱布/纱布)或鼻后填塞均无法控制的反复鼻衄患者,在全身麻醉下进行紧急内窥镜鼻翼动脉结扎/灼烧术。通过对这些患者术后 6 个月的常规内窥镜随访,确定了这项技术的有效性。 结果在 55 名复发性鼻衄患者中,8 名患者通过保守治疗(数字加压/外敷冰袋)治愈,18 名患者通过前鼻腔填塞治愈,12 名患者通过前后鼻腔填塞治愈,17 名患者需要进行鼻翼动脉结扎/灼烧术。这些术后患者均未再发生鼻出血:事实证明,与治疗性栓塞或其他手术相比,椎动脉结扎是控制顽固性难治性鼻衄的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信