{"title":"Management of intractable epistaxis in a tertiary care referral hospital: an observational study","authors":"Sanjeev Mohanty, Sudha Balasubramanian, Bulu Nahak, Chimay Sundaray, Sejal Mehta","doi":"10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20242041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of sphenopalatine artery ligation/ cauterisation as a surgical intervention in control of refractory epistaxis and achieving haemostasis.\nMethods: The study was done with patients in the Department of ENT, Head and Neck surgery Health care hospital and out station referrals from institution’s outreach clinics, for a period of 2 years (May 2020-April 2022). Patients with recurrent epistaxis, not controlled by digital pressure, anterior packing (ribbon gauze/ merocele) or postnasal packing were taken up for emergency endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterisation under general anaesthesia. Effectiveness of this technique was established by routine endoscopic follow up of these patients over a period of 6 months post procedure. \nResults: Out of a total of 55 patients who presented with recurrent epistaxis, 8 patients settled down with conservative management (digital pressure/external ice pack application), 18 patients settled down with anterior nasal packing, 12 patients settled down with anterior and posterior nasal packing and 17 patients required sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterization. None of these postop patients had any further episodes of nasal bleed.\nConclusions: Sphenopalatine artery ligation has proven to be an effective measure in control of intractable refractory epistaxis when compared to therapeutic embolization or other procedures.","PeriodicalId":14350,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20242041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of sphenopalatine artery ligation/ cauterisation as a surgical intervention in control of refractory epistaxis and achieving haemostasis.
Methods: The study was done with patients in the Department of ENT, Head and Neck surgery Health care hospital and out station referrals from institution’s outreach clinics, for a period of 2 years (May 2020-April 2022). Patients with recurrent epistaxis, not controlled by digital pressure, anterior packing (ribbon gauze/ merocele) or postnasal packing were taken up for emergency endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterisation under general anaesthesia. Effectiveness of this technique was established by routine endoscopic follow up of these patients over a period of 6 months post procedure.
Results: Out of a total of 55 patients who presented with recurrent epistaxis, 8 patients settled down with conservative management (digital pressure/external ice pack application), 18 patients settled down with anterior nasal packing, 12 patients settled down with anterior and posterior nasal packing and 17 patients required sphenopalatine artery ligation/cauterization. None of these postop patients had any further episodes of nasal bleed.
Conclusions: Sphenopalatine artery ligation has proven to be an effective measure in control of intractable refractory epistaxis when compared to therapeutic embolization or other procedures.