A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
M. Ho, Ta-Kang Yeh, Tung-Shan Liao, Y. Chung
{"title":"A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service","authors":"M. Ho, Ta-Kang Yeh, Tung-Shan Liao, Y. Chung","doi":"10.1515/jag-2024-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Relative GNSS positioning, a longstanding measurement standard, often incurs high manpower and equipment costs. Online Precise Point Positioning (PPP) presents a cost-effective alternative by minimizing these expenses. However, transitioning from the ITRF2014 to the TWD97[2010] coordinate system presents unique challenges. This study evaluates the efficacy of five PPP services – AUSPOS, OPUS, CSRS-PPP, magicGNSS, and RTX-PP – using 2018 Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) data. Following a seven-parameter transformation, we systematically compared these services to identify the optimal solution for Taiwan’s geodetic survey needs. Our analysis reveals that RTX-PP offers superior performance, achieving 1 cm accuracy over 24 h and 4 cm accuracy over 1 h. Most stations met these accuracy standards, even during short observation intervals from September 9, 2018. Nonetheless, there is a 24.1 % likelihood of exceeding the 6 cm accuracy threshold due to variations in GNSS data quality. To address this, we employed G-Nut software to analyze station data quality across regions, recommending station selection based on data ratio and cycle slips to improve PPP solution accuracy effectively.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2024-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative GNSS positioning, a longstanding measurement standard, often incurs high manpower and equipment costs. Online Precise Point Positioning (PPP) presents a cost-effective alternative by minimizing these expenses. However, transitioning from the ITRF2014 to the TWD97[2010] coordinate system presents unique challenges. This study evaluates the efficacy of five PPP services – AUSPOS, OPUS, CSRS-PPP, magicGNSS, and RTX-PP – using 2018 Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) data. Following a seven-parameter transformation, we systematically compared these services to identify the optimal solution for Taiwan’s geodetic survey needs. Our analysis reveals that RTX-PP offers superior performance, achieving 1 cm accuracy over 24 h and 4 cm accuracy over 1 h. Most stations met these accuracy standards, even during short observation intervals from September 9, 2018. Nonetheless, there is a 24.1 % likelihood of exceeding the 6 cm accuracy threshold due to variations in GNSS data quality. To address this, we employed G-Nut software to analyze station data quality across regions, recommending station selection based on data ratio and cycle slips to improve PPP solution accuracy effectively.
台湾地籍测量的新挑战:结合 CORS 数据和在线 PPP 服务的可行性分析
全球导航卫星系统的相对定位是一项历史悠久的测量标准,通常需要高昂的人力和设备成本。在线精确点定位(PPP)最大程度地降低了这些成本,是一种具有成本效益的替代方法。然而,从 ITRF2014 到 TWD97[2010] 坐标系的过渡带来了独特的挑战。本研究利用 2018 年连续运行基准站(CORS)数据评估了五种 PPP 服务(AUSPOS、OPUS、CSRS-PPP、magicGNSS 和 RTX-PP)的功效。根据七参数转换,我们系统地比较了这些服务,以确定满足台湾大地测量需求的最佳解决方案。我们的分析表明,RTX-PP 性能优越,可在 24 小时内达到 1 厘米的精度,在 1 小时内达到 4 厘米的精度。即使从 2018 年 9 月 9 日起的短时间观测间隔内,大多数站点也达到了这些精度标准。然而,由于 GNSS 数据质量的变化,超过 6 厘米精度阈值的可能性为 24.1%。针对这一问题,我们采用G-Nut软件对各区域的台站数据质量进行分析,根据数据比和周期滑移推荐台站选择,以有效提高PPP解算精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信