The kinematics of proal chewing in rats

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
E. D. McParland, J. K. Mitchell, J. Laurence-Chasen, L. C. Aspinwall, O. Afolabi, K. Takahashi, C. F. Ross, N. J. Gidmark
{"title":"The kinematics of proal chewing in rats","authors":"E. D. McParland, J. K. Mitchell, J. Laurence-Chasen, L. C. Aspinwall, O. Afolabi, K. Takahashi, C. F. Ross, N. J. Gidmark","doi":"10.1093/iob/obae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chewing kinematics are well-documented in several mammal species with fused mandibular symphyses, but relatively understudied in mammals with an unfused symphysis, despite the fact that more than half of extant Mammalia have an unfused mandibular symphysis. The Wistar brown rat (Rattus norvegicus, Berkenhout, 1769) is widely used in human health research, including studies of mastication or neurological studies where mastication is the output behavior. These animals are known to have unfused mandibular symphyses and proal jaw (rostrocaudal) motion during occlusion, but the lack of high resolution, 3-dimensional analysis of rat chewing leaves the functional significance of symphyseal mobility unknown. We used biplanar fluoroscopy and the X-ray Reconstruction Of Moving Morphology (XROMM) workflow (Brainerd et al. 2010; Gatesy et al., 2010) to quantify chewing kinematics in three brown rats, quantifying overall jaw kinematics, including motions about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and unfused mandibular symphysis. During occlusion, the teeth and the mandibular condyle translate almost exclusively anteriorly (proal) during occlusion, with little motion in any other degrees of freedom. At the symphysis, we observed minimal flexion throughout the chew cycle. Overall, there are fundamental differences in jaw kinematics between rats and other mammals and therefore rats are not an appropriate proxy for ancestral mammal jaw mechanics. Additionally, differences between humans and rat chewing kinematics must be considered when using rats as a clinical model for pathological feeding research.","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obae023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chewing kinematics are well-documented in several mammal species with fused mandibular symphyses, but relatively understudied in mammals with an unfused symphysis, despite the fact that more than half of extant Mammalia have an unfused mandibular symphysis. The Wistar brown rat (Rattus norvegicus, Berkenhout, 1769) is widely used in human health research, including studies of mastication or neurological studies where mastication is the output behavior. These animals are known to have unfused mandibular symphyses and proal jaw (rostrocaudal) motion during occlusion, but the lack of high resolution, 3-dimensional analysis of rat chewing leaves the functional significance of symphyseal mobility unknown. We used biplanar fluoroscopy and the X-ray Reconstruction Of Moving Morphology (XROMM) workflow (Brainerd et al. 2010; Gatesy et al., 2010) to quantify chewing kinematics in three brown rats, quantifying overall jaw kinematics, including motions about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and unfused mandibular symphysis. During occlusion, the teeth and the mandibular condyle translate almost exclusively anteriorly (proal) during occlusion, with little motion in any other degrees of freedom. At the symphysis, we observed minimal flexion throughout the chew cycle. Overall, there are fundamental differences in jaw kinematics between rats and other mammals and therefore rats are not an appropriate proxy for ancestral mammal jaw mechanics. Additionally, differences between humans and rat chewing kinematics must be considered when using rats as a clinical model for pathological feeding research.
大鼠咀嚼前牙的运动学特征
咀嚼运动学在几种下颌骨骨骺融合的哺乳动物中得到了很好的记录,但对下颌骨骨骺未融合的哺乳动物的研究相对较少,尽管现存哺乳动物中有一半以上的下颌骨骨骺未融合。Wistar 棕色大鼠(Rattus norvegicus,Berkenhout,1769 年)被广泛用于人类健康研究,包括咀嚼研究或以咀嚼为输出行为的神经学研究。众所周知,这些动物在咬合过程中下颌骨交接处不融合,颚前部(喙尾)运动,但由于缺乏对大鼠咀嚼的高分辨率三维分析,交接处运动的功能意义尚不清楚。我们使用双平面透视和X射线移动形态重建(XROMM)工作流程(Brainerd等人,2010年;Gatesy等人,2010年)量化了三只棕色大鼠的咀嚼运动学,量化了整体颌骨运动学,包括颞下颌关节(TMJ)和未融合的下颌骨骨骺的运动。在咬合过程中,牙齿和下颌骨髁状突几乎完全向前方(proal)移动,在其他自由度上几乎没有运动。在干骺端,我们观察到在整个咀嚼周期中屈曲很小。总体而言,大鼠和其他哺乳动物的颌骨运动学存在根本性差异,因此大鼠并不能代表祖先哺乳动物的颌骨力学。此外,在使用大鼠作为病理摄食研究的临床模型时,必须考虑人类与大鼠咀嚼运动学之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信