Analysis of Models to Predict Mechanical Properties of High-Performance and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Using Machine Learning

IF 3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
M. Hematibahar, M. Kharun, A. Beskopylny, S. Stel’makh, E. Shcherban’, I. Razveeva
{"title":"Analysis of Models to Predict Mechanical Properties of High-Performance and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Using Machine Learning","authors":"M. Hematibahar, M. Kharun, A. Beskopylny, S. Stel’makh, E. Shcherban’, I. Razveeva","doi":"10.3390/jcs8080287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-Performance Concrete (HPC) and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) have many applications in civil engineering industries. These two types of concrete have as many similarities as they have differences with each other, such as the mix design and additive powders like silica fume, metakaolin, and various fibers, however, the optimal percentages of the mixture design properties of each element of these concretes are completely different. This study investigated the differences and similarities between these two types of concrete to find better mechanical behavior through mixture design and parameters of each concrete. In addition, this paper studied the correlation matrix through the machine learning method to predict the mechanical properties and find the relationship between the concrete mix design elements and the mechanical properties. In this way, Linear, Ridge, Lasso, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision tree, and Partial least squares (PLS) regressions have been chosen to find the best regression types. To find the accuracy, the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were selected. Finally, PLS, Linear, and Lasso regressions had better results than other regressions, with R2 greater than 93%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. In general, the present study shows that HPC and UHPC have different mix designs and mechanical properties. In addition, PLS, Linear, and Lasso regressions are the best regressions for predicting mechanical properties.","PeriodicalId":15435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8080287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-Performance Concrete (HPC) and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) have many applications in civil engineering industries. These two types of concrete have as many similarities as they have differences with each other, such as the mix design and additive powders like silica fume, metakaolin, and various fibers, however, the optimal percentages of the mixture design properties of each element of these concretes are completely different. This study investigated the differences and similarities between these two types of concrete to find better mechanical behavior through mixture design and parameters of each concrete. In addition, this paper studied the correlation matrix through the machine learning method to predict the mechanical properties and find the relationship between the concrete mix design elements and the mechanical properties. In this way, Linear, Ridge, Lasso, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision tree, and Partial least squares (PLS) regressions have been chosen to find the best regression types. To find the accuracy, the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were selected. Finally, PLS, Linear, and Lasso regressions had better results than other regressions, with R2 greater than 93%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. In general, the present study shows that HPC and UHPC have different mix designs and mechanical properties. In addition, PLS, Linear, and Lasso regressions are the best regressions for predicting mechanical properties.
利用机器学习预测高性能和超高性能混凝土力学性能的模型分析
高性能混凝土(HPC)和超高性能混凝土(UHPC)在土木工程行业应用广泛。这两种混凝土既有相同之处,也有不同之处,如混合设计和硅灰、偏高岭土和各种纤维等添加剂,但这两种混凝土中每种元素的混合设计性能的最佳百分比却完全不同。本研究调查了这两种混凝土之间的异同,以便通过每种混凝土的拌合物设计和参数找到更好的力学性能。此外,本文还通过机器学习方法研究了预测力学性能的相关矩阵,并找到了混凝土拌合物设计元素与力学性能之间的关系。为此,本文选择了线性回归、岭回归、Lasso 回归、随机森林回归、K-最近邻回归(KNN)、决策树回归和部分最小二乘法(PLS)回归,以寻找最佳回归类型。为了找出准确性,选择了决定系数 (R2)、平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和均方根误差 (RMSE)。最后,PLS、线性回归和 Lasso 回归的结果优于其他回归,R2 分别大于 93%、92% 和 92%。总体而言,本研究表明 HPC 和 UHPC 具有不同的混合设计和机械性能。此外,PLS、线性回归和 Lasso 回归是预测力学性能的最佳回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Composites Science
Journal of Composites Science MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
11 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信