Risk Factors for Progression of Vitreomacular Traction to Macular Hole

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ariana Allen, Yuxi Zheng, Terry Lee, Suzanna Joseph, Xinxin Zhang, Henry L. Feng, Sharon Fekrat
{"title":"Risk Factors for Progression of Vitreomacular Traction to Macular Hole","authors":"Ariana Allen, Yuxi Zheng, Terry Lee, Suzanna Joseph, Xinxin Zhang, Henry L. Feng, Sharon Fekrat","doi":"10.1177/24741264241264937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics associated with progression of vitreomacular traction (VMT) to a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) and lamellar macular hole (LMH). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with an OCT-confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic VMT and 6 or more months of follow-up was performed. Clinical data included age, sex, race, systemic comorbidities, hormone replacement therapy, corrected visual acuity (VA), subjective visual symptoms, OCT signs, and the presence of or progression to FTMH or LMH. Results: Of the 287 eyes with VMT, 48 (16.7%) progressed to MH. Twelve eyes (4.2%) progressed to LMH, and 36 eyes (12.5%) progressed to FTMH. Female sex ( P = .02), myopic refractive status in phakic eyes ( P = .02), subjective decreased VA ( P = .01), and the presence of an inner segment–outer segment junction disruption on OCT ( P = .003) were risk factors for progression from VMT to FTMH. Subjective metamorphopsia was a risk factor for progression to FTMH ( P = .001) and LMH ( P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, patients who had an FTMH in the fellow eye were significantly more likely to have VMT progress to FTMH in the study eye (24.0% vs 8.7%; P = .04). Having an LMH in the fellow eye was not a risk factor for progression to LMH in the study eye ( P = .47). Conclusions: Risk factors were found for the progression of VMT to MH that may be clinically relevant for risk-stratifying patients presenting with VMT.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264241264937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics associated with progression of vitreomacular traction (VMT) to a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) and lamellar macular hole (LMH). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with an OCT-confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic VMT and 6 or more months of follow-up was performed. Clinical data included age, sex, race, systemic comorbidities, hormone replacement therapy, corrected visual acuity (VA), subjective visual symptoms, OCT signs, and the presence of or progression to FTMH or LMH. Results: Of the 287 eyes with VMT, 48 (16.7%) progressed to MH. Twelve eyes (4.2%) progressed to LMH, and 36 eyes (12.5%) progressed to FTMH. Female sex ( P = .02), myopic refractive status in phakic eyes ( P = .02), subjective decreased VA ( P = .01), and the presence of an inner segment–outer segment junction disruption on OCT ( P = .003) were risk factors for progression from VMT to FTMH. Subjective metamorphopsia was a risk factor for progression to FTMH ( P = .001) and LMH ( P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, patients who had an FTMH in the fellow eye were significantly more likely to have VMT progress to FTMH in the study eye (24.0% vs 8.7%; P = .04). Having an LMH in the fellow eye was not a risk factor for progression to LMH in the study eye ( P = .47). Conclusions: Risk factors were found for the progression of VMT to MH that may be clinically relevant for risk-stratifying patients presenting with VMT.
玻璃体黄斑牵引发展为黄斑孔的风险因素
目的:评估玻璃体黄斑牵引(VMT)发展为全厚黄斑孔(FTMH)和片状黄斑孔(LMH)的相关临床和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特征。研究方法对经 OCT 确诊为特发性 VMT 并随访 6 个月或更长时间的患者进行回顾性队列研究。临床数据包括年龄、性别、种族、全身合并症、激素替代疗法、矫正视力(VA)、主观视觉症状、OCT征象以及是否存在或进展为FTMH或LMH。结果:在 287 例 VMT 患者中,48 例(16.7%)进展为 MH。12眼(4.2%)进展为LMH,36眼(12.5%)进展为FTMH。女性(P = 0.02)、隐形眼镜的近视屈光状态(P = 0.02)、主观视力下降(P = 0.01)以及 OCT 上出现内节-外节交界处破坏(P = 0.003)是 VMT 进展为 FTMH 的风险因素。主观偏盲是发展为 FTMH ( P = .001) 和 LMH ( P = .01) 的危险因素。在一项亚组分析中,同侧眼有 FTMH 的患者,其研究眼 VMT 发展为 FTMH 的几率明显更高(24.0% vs 8.7%; P = .04)。同侧眼有 LMH 并不是研究眼发展为 LMH 的风险因素 ( P = .47)。结论:研究发现了VMT进展为MH的风险因素,这些因素可能与临床上对VMT患者进行风险分级有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信