The digital future of Spanish universities: facing the challenge of a digital transformation

Teodoro Luque-Martínez, Luis Doña-Toledo, Nina Faraoni
{"title":"The digital future of Spanish universities: facing the challenge of a digital transformation","authors":"Teodoro Luque-Martínez, Luis Doña-Toledo, Nina Faraoni","doi":"10.1108/bl-02-2024-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to advance the understanding of both the challenges and the priorities facing Spanish universities undergoing the digital transformation era, to identify areas for improvement in university management, from a managerial point of view.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo analyze the importance and adequacy of various aspects related to digitalization, the authors use the importance–performance matrix, by surveying figures who have or have had a managerial position in the university, such as rectors and vice-rectors.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed that the priority areas were related to strategic and financial management, knowledge management and the society and environment dimension. It all revealed imbalances, the most important of which were in the areas referring to attracting talent, sources of financing, strategic management and digitalization.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study could benefit from considering or placing greater emphasis on alternative viewpoints, including those of external experts and administrative managers at public universities.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe practical implications relate to university management. In particular, the study highlights two issues that are a priority: attracting talent and training for university management as well as for data management. It follows from these results that legislative development and public funding should be directed towards adapting the training offer as well as the management structure and processes to the context of digitalization.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThese results have implications for the public sphere, for decision-making related to the public funding that organizations receive from governments. Indeed, as the empirical results demonstrate, the proposed framework is effective not only in assessing the status of digitalization in the university but also in providing information on the most important aspects that need particular attention to achieve the desired future condition.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe novelty of this study lies in the analysis and evaluation of the digitalization process and how public universities are facing it, from the perspective of university management. Methodologically, the novelty lies in the use of the importance–performance matrix, which not only provides insight into the importance of different aspects to be analyzed but also provides information about their adequacy.\n","PeriodicalId":293295,"journal":{"name":"The Bottom Line","volume":"3 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-02-2024-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to advance the understanding of both the challenges and the priorities facing Spanish universities undergoing the digital transformation era, to identify areas for improvement in university management, from a managerial point of view. Design/methodology/approach To analyze the importance and adequacy of various aspects related to digitalization, the authors use the importance–performance matrix, by surveying figures who have or have had a managerial position in the university, such as rectors and vice-rectors. Findings The results showed that the priority areas were related to strategic and financial management, knowledge management and the society and environment dimension. It all revealed imbalances, the most important of which were in the areas referring to attracting talent, sources of financing, strategic management and digitalization. Research limitations/implications The study could benefit from considering or placing greater emphasis on alternative viewpoints, including those of external experts and administrative managers at public universities. Practical implications The practical implications relate to university management. In particular, the study highlights two issues that are a priority: attracting talent and training for university management as well as for data management. It follows from these results that legislative development and public funding should be directed towards adapting the training offer as well as the management structure and processes to the context of digitalization. Social implications These results have implications for the public sphere, for decision-making related to the public funding that organizations receive from governments. Indeed, as the empirical results demonstrate, the proposed framework is effective not only in assessing the status of digitalization in the university but also in providing information on the most important aspects that need particular attention to achieve the desired future condition. Originality/value The novelty of this study lies in the analysis and evaluation of the digitalization process and how public universities are facing it, from the perspective of university management. Methodologically, the novelty lies in the use of the importance–performance matrix, which not only provides insight into the importance of different aspects to be analyzed but also provides information about their adequacy.
西班牙大学的数字化未来:面对数字化转型的挑战
为了分析与数字化相关的各个方面的重要性和充分性,作者使用了重要性-绩效矩阵,调查了在大学中担任过或曾经担任过管理职务的人士,如校长和副校长。研究的局限性/启示这项研究可以考虑或更加重视其他观点,包括外部专家和公立大学行政管理人员的观点。特别是,本研究强调了两个需要优先解决的问题:为大学管理和数据管理吸引人才和开展培训。从这些结果中可以看出,立法发展和公共资金应着眼于调整培训课程以及管理结构和流程,使其适应数字化的背景。社会影响这些结果对公共领域,对与各组织从政府获得的公共资金相关的决策具有影响。事实上,正如实证结果所证明的那样,所提出的框架不仅能有效评估大学的数字化状况,还能提供为实现理想的未来状态而需要特别关注的最重要方面的信息。原创性/价值本研究的新颖之处在于从大学管理的角度分析和评估数字化进程以及公立大学如何面对数字化。在方法论上,其新颖之处在于使用了重要性-绩效矩阵,这不仅有助于深入了解待分析的不同方面的重要性,还能提供有关其适当性的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信