Peter E. Langdon, Magdalena M. Apanasionok, Emma Scripps, Alastair Barrowcliff, Asit Biswas, Karen Bunning, Cheryl Burbidge, Katherine Byron-Daniel, Alex Cookson, Sarah Croom, Malwina Filipczuk, David Gillespie, Richard P. Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Rachel McNamara, Lawrence Patterson, Dheeraj Rai, Robyn Steward, Kylie M. Gray
{"title":"Behavioural interventions to treat anxiety in adults with autism and moderate to severe intellectual disabilities: The BEAMS-ID feasibility study","authors":"Peter E. Langdon, Magdalena M. Apanasionok, Emma Scripps, Alastair Barrowcliff, Asit Biswas, Karen Bunning, Cheryl Burbidge, Katherine Byron-Daniel, Alex Cookson, Sarah Croom, Malwina Filipczuk, David Gillespie, Richard P. Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Rachel McNamara, Lawrence Patterson, Dheeraj Rai, Robyn Steward, Kylie M. Gray","doi":"10.1111/jar.13282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this feasibility study was to adapt and model a behavioural intervention for anxiety with autistic adults with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight autistic adults with moderate or severe intellectual disabilities, 37 carers, and 40 therapists took part in this single-group non-randomised feasibility study designed to test intervention feasibility and acceptability, outcome measures, and research processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention was judged as feasible and acceptable by autistic adults with intellectual disabilities, carers, and therapists. Minor intervention revisions were suggested. Carers completed 100% of outcome measures and the missing data rate was low. Complying with legislation governing the inclusion of participants who lack capacity to decide whether they wanted to take part in this study led to an average 5-week enrolment delay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention and associated study processes were judged to be feasible and acceptable and should now be tested within a larger randomised trial.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13282","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The aim of this feasibility study was to adapt and model a behavioural intervention for anxiety with autistic adults with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities.
Method
Twenty-eight autistic adults with moderate or severe intellectual disabilities, 37 carers, and 40 therapists took part in this single-group non-randomised feasibility study designed to test intervention feasibility and acceptability, outcome measures, and research processes.
Results
The intervention was judged as feasible and acceptable by autistic adults with intellectual disabilities, carers, and therapists. Minor intervention revisions were suggested. Carers completed 100% of outcome measures and the missing data rate was low. Complying with legislation governing the inclusion of participants who lack capacity to decide whether they wanted to take part in this study led to an average 5-week enrolment delay.
Conclusion
The intervention and associated study processes were judged to be feasible and acceptable and should now be tested within a larger randomised trial.
期刊介绍:
JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.