CXCR1/2 antagonism inhibits neutrophil function and not recruitment in cancer.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Oncoimmunology Pub Date : 2024-07-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2162402X.2024.2384674
Jeff W Kwak, Helena Q Nguyen, Alex Camai, Grace M Huffman, Surapat Mekvanich, Naia N Kenney, Xiaodong Zhu, Timothy W Randolph, A McGarry Houghton
{"title":"CXCR1/2 antagonism inhibits neutrophil function and not recruitment in cancer.","authors":"Jeff W Kwak, Helena Q Nguyen, Alex Camai, Grace M Huffman, Surapat Mekvanich, Naia N Kenney, Xiaodong Zhu, Timothy W Randolph, A McGarry Houghton","doi":"10.1080/2162402X.2024.2384674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The level of tumor and circulating CXCR1/2-expressing neutrophils and CXCR1/2 ligands correlate with poor patient outcomes, inversely correlate with tumoral lymphocyte content, and predict immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment failure. Accordingly, CXCR2-selective and CXCR1/2 dual inhibitors exhibit activity both as single agents and in combination with ICI treatment in mouse tumor models. Based on such reports, clinical trials combining CXCR1/2 axis antagonists with ICI treatment for cancer patients are underway. It has been assumed that CXCR1/2 blockade impacts tumors by blocking neutrophil chemotaxis and reducing neutrophil content in tumors. Here, we show that while CXCR2 antagonism does slow tumor growth, it does not preclude neutrophil recruitment into tumor. Instead, CXCR1/2 inhibition alters neutrophil function by blocking the polarization of transcriptional programs toward immune suppressive phenotypes and rendering neutrophils incapable of suppressing lymphocyte proliferation. This is associated with decreased release of reactive oxygen species and Arginase-1 into the extracellular milieu. Remarkably, these therapeutics do not impact the ability of neutrophils to phagocytose and kill ingested bacteria. Taken together, these results mechanistically explain why CXCR1/2 inhibition has been active in cancer but without infectious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48714,"journal":{"name":"Oncoimmunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoimmunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2024.2384674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The level of tumor and circulating CXCR1/2-expressing neutrophils and CXCR1/2 ligands correlate with poor patient outcomes, inversely correlate with tumoral lymphocyte content, and predict immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment failure. Accordingly, CXCR2-selective and CXCR1/2 dual inhibitors exhibit activity both as single agents and in combination with ICI treatment in mouse tumor models. Based on such reports, clinical trials combining CXCR1/2 axis antagonists with ICI treatment for cancer patients are underway. It has been assumed that CXCR1/2 blockade impacts tumors by blocking neutrophil chemotaxis and reducing neutrophil content in tumors. Here, we show that while CXCR2 antagonism does slow tumor growth, it does not preclude neutrophil recruitment into tumor. Instead, CXCR1/2 inhibition alters neutrophil function by blocking the polarization of transcriptional programs toward immune suppressive phenotypes and rendering neutrophils incapable of suppressing lymphocyte proliferation. This is associated with decreased release of reactive oxygen species and Arginase-1 into the extracellular milieu. Remarkably, these therapeutics do not impact the ability of neutrophils to phagocytose and kill ingested bacteria. Taken together, these results mechanistically explain why CXCR1/2 inhibition has been active in cancer but without infectious complications.

CXCR1/2 拮抗剂可抑制中性粒细胞的功能,而不是抑制其在癌症中的招募。
肿瘤和循环中表达 CXCR1/2 的中性粒细胞和 CXCR1/2 配体的水平与患者的不良预后相关,与肿瘤淋巴细胞含量成反比,并可预测免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的失败。因此,在小鼠肿瘤模型中,CXCR2 选择性抑制剂和 CXCR1/2 双抑制剂作为单药或与 ICI 联合治疗均显示出活性。根据这些报告,目前正在对癌症患者进行 CXCR1/2 轴拮抗剂与 ICI 治疗相结合的临床试验。一般认为,CXCR1/2 阻断剂通过阻断中性粒细胞趋化和减少肿瘤中的中性粒细胞含量来影响肿瘤。在这里,我们发现虽然 CXCR2 拮抗剂确实能减缓肿瘤生长,但并不能阻止中性粒细胞被招募到肿瘤中。相反,CXCR1/2 抑制通过阻止转录程序向免疫抑制表型极化,使中性粒细胞无法抑制淋巴细胞增殖,从而改变了中性粒细胞的功能。这与活性氧和精氨酸酶-1向细胞外环境的释放减少有关。值得注意的是,这些疗法不会影响中性粒细胞吞噬和杀死摄入细菌的能力。综上所述,这些结果从机理上解释了为什么 CXCR1/2 抑制剂对癌症有疗效,但却不会引起感染性并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncoimmunology
Oncoimmunology ONCOLOGYIMMUNOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
276
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: OncoImmunology is a dynamic, high-profile, open access journal that comprehensively covers tumor immunology and immunotherapy. As cancer immunotherapy advances, OncoImmunology is committed to publishing top-tier research encompassing all facets of basic and applied tumor immunology. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: -Basic and translational studies in immunology of both solid and hematological malignancies -Inflammation, innate and acquired immune responses against cancer -Mechanisms of cancer immunoediting and immune evasion -Modern immunotherapies, including immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell, NK-cell, and macrophage engagers, and CAR T cells -Immunological effects of conventional anticancer therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信