What's different about digital? A qualitative interview study exploring experiences of adapting in-person behaviour change interventions for digital delivery

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Eva Cooney, Elaine Toomey, Kathleen Ryan, Oonagh Meade, Jenny McSharry
{"title":"What's different about digital? A qualitative interview study exploring experiences of adapting in-person behaviour change interventions for digital delivery","authors":"Eva Cooney,&nbsp;Elaine Toomey,&nbsp;Kathleen Ryan,&nbsp;Oonagh Meade,&nbsp;Jenny McSharry","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Digital health behaviour change interventions may be adapted from in-person interventions, without appropriate consideration of how the digital context might differ. Drawing on the wider literature on behaviour change intervention development, this research aims to explore the digital adaptation process of health behaviour change interventions and the specific considerations for digital modes of delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative interview study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Interviews with 15 intervention developers/facilitators were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight a continuum of digitalization, where variation in technology available and human support influences considerations for digital adaptation. ‘What vs how: “trying to do the impossible”’ describes the balance between retaining the intervention's active ingredients while modifying for digital delivery. Through ‘Trial and error’, participants described an iterative process based on experience of delivery. ‘Creating connection and engagement’ emphasizes the importance of social support and the challenges of replicating this.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Several considerations for digital adaptations are proposed including the involvement of end-users (facilitators and recipients) during adaptation, the need to understand the original intervention and new context for use, and the different motivational needs of digital intervention recipients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 4","pages":"972-999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12741","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Digital health behaviour change interventions may be adapted from in-person interventions, without appropriate consideration of how the digital context might differ. Drawing on the wider literature on behaviour change intervention development, this research aims to explore the digital adaptation process of health behaviour change interventions and the specific considerations for digital modes of delivery.

Design

A qualitative interview study.

Methods

Interviews with 15 intervention developers/facilitators were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Findings highlight a continuum of digitalization, where variation in technology available and human support influences considerations for digital adaptation. ‘What vs how: “trying to do the impossible”’ describes the balance between retaining the intervention's active ingredients while modifying for digital delivery. Through ‘Trial and error’, participants described an iterative process based on experience of delivery. ‘Creating connection and engagement’ emphasizes the importance of social support and the challenges of replicating this.

Conclusions

Several considerations for digital adaptations are proposed including the involvement of end-users (facilitators and recipients) during adaptation, the need to understand the original intervention and new context for use, and the different motivational needs of digital intervention recipients.

Abstract Image

数字化有什么不同?一项定性访谈研究,探索将面对面的行为改变干预措施调整为数字交付的经验。
目的:数字化的健康行为改变干预措施可能会根据人际干预措施进行调整,而没有适当考虑数字化环境可能存在的差异。本研究借鉴了有关行为改变干预发展的更广泛文献,旨在探索健康行为改变干预的数字化适应过程,以及数字化实施模式的具体考虑因素:设计:定性访谈研究:方法:采用归纳式主题分析法对 15 名干预措施开发者/推动者进行访谈分析:结果:研究结果强调了数字化的连续性,其中可用技术和人力支持的差异影响了数字化适应的考虑因素。什么与如何:"试图完成不可能完成的任务 "描述了在保留干预措施的有效成分的同时为数字化交付进行修改之间的平衡。通过 "试错",与会者描述了一个基于实施经验的迭代过程。建立联系和参与 "强调了社会支持的重要性以及复制这种支持所面临的挑战:结论:我们提出了数字化改编的几个注意事项,包括最终用户(促进者和接受者)在改编过程中的参与、了解原始干预和新使用环境的必要性以及数字化干预接受者的不同动机需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信