Comparative outcomes of DSA positive, crossmatch negative living donor kidney transplants versus remaining on the waitlist for an HLA compatible deceased donor

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Eva Santos , Gaetano Lucisano , Frank J.M.F. Dor , Michelle Willicombe
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of DSA positive, crossmatch negative living donor kidney transplants versus remaining on the waitlist for an HLA compatible deceased donor","authors":"Eva Santos ,&nbsp;Gaetano Lucisano ,&nbsp;Frank J.M.F. Dor ,&nbsp;Michelle Willicombe","doi":"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The clinical relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies in the setting of a negative crossmatch (DSA + XM-) remains controversial. In this study we investigate the outcomes of patients with a DSA + XM- living donor (LDi) who proceeded with an HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplant compared with those who waited for an HLA-compatible deceased donor (DDc).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We investigated 359 patients on the transplant waiting list who had at least one potential HLAi living donor, from which 203 DSA + XM- pairs were identified and outcomes analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 203 patients, 96 (47.3%) received a LD transplant: 52/96 (54.2%) a LDi, and 44/96 (45.8%) an alternative compatible LD. In addition, 107 patients out of 203(52.7%) waited for a DDc, of which 47(43.9%) were subsequently transplanted. Our adjusted analysis showed that the LDi transplantation did not offer a superior patient survival over waiting for a DDc transplant. For those transplanted, there was no difference in patient (<em>p</em> = 0.065) or death censored allograft survival (<em>p</em> = 0.37) between DDc and LDi recipients. However, there was a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.043) and antibody-mediated rejection (<em>p</em> = 0.005) in the LDi group. Having a high pre-transplant calculated reaction frequency and preformed DSA to both class I and class II antigens were associated with inferior outcomes in the LDi transplants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the lack of difference in allograft survival between LDi and DDc transplants, in the absence of an alternative compatible living donor, proceeding with a LDi should be supported despite a higher rejection risk, providing individual risk assessment and shared decision making is undertaken.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23304,"journal":{"name":"Transplant immunology","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096632742400114X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The clinical relevance of preformed donor specific antibodies in the setting of a negative crossmatch (DSA + XM-) remains controversial. In this study we investigate the outcomes of patients with a DSA + XM- living donor (LDi) who proceeded with an HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplant compared with those who waited for an HLA-compatible deceased donor (DDc).

Materials and methods

We investigated 359 patients on the transplant waiting list who had at least one potential HLAi living donor, from which 203 DSA + XM- pairs were identified and outcomes analysed.

Results

Out of 203 patients, 96 (47.3%) received a LD transplant: 52/96 (54.2%) a LDi, and 44/96 (45.8%) an alternative compatible LD. In addition, 107 patients out of 203(52.7%) waited for a DDc, of which 47(43.9%) were subsequently transplanted. Our adjusted analysis showed that the LDi transplantation did not offer a superior patient survival over waiting for a DDc transplant. For those transplanted, there was no difference in patient (p = 0.065) or death censored allograft survival (p = 0.37) between DDc and LDi recipients. However, there was a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection (p = 0.043) and antibody-mediated rejection (p = 0.005) in the LDi group. Having a high pre-transplant calculated reaction frequency and preformed DSA to both class I and class II antigens were associated with inferior outcomes in the LDi transplants.

Conclusions

Given the lack of difference in allograft survival between LDi and DDc transplants, in the absence of an alternative compatible living donor, proceeding with a LDi should be supported despite a higher rejection risk, providing individual risk assessment and shared decision making is undertaken.

DSA 阳性、交叉配型阴性活体肾移植与继续等待 HLA 相容的已故捐献者的结果比较。
导言:在交叉配型阴性(DSA + XM-)的情况下,预先形成的供体特异性抗体的临床意义仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们调查了DSA + XM-活体供体(LDi)患者与等待HLA相合的死亡供体(DDc)患者进行HLA不相容(HLAi)移植的结果:我们调查了移植候选名单上至少有一名潜在HLAi活体供体的359名患者,从中确定了203对DSA+XM-配对,并对结果进行了分析:在 203 名患者中,96 人(47.3%)接受了 LD 移植:52/96(54.2%)接受了 LDi 移植,44/96(45.8%)接受了其他相合的 LD 移植。此外,203 例患者中有 107 例(52.7%)等待 DDc,其中 47 例(43.9%)随后接受了移植。我们的调整分析表明,LDi 移植的患者存活率并不比等待 DDc 移植的患者高。在接受移植的患者中,DDc 和 LDi 受者的患者存活率(p = 0.065)或死亡删减后的异体移植存活率(p = 0.37)没有差异。然而,LDi组急性异体移植排斥反应(p = 0.043)和抗体介导的排斥反应(p = 0.005)的发生率较高。移植前计算出的高反应频率以及对I类和II类抗原预先进行的DSA与LDi移植的不良预后有关:鉴于LDi移植和DDc移植的异体移植存活率没有差异,在没有其他相容的活体供体的情况下,尽管排斥风险较高,但如果进行了个体风险评估和共同决策,仍应支持进行LDi移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant immunology
Transplant immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Transplant Immunology will publish up-to-date information on all aspects of the broad field it encompasses. The journal will be directed at (basic) scientists, tissue typers, transplant physicians and surgeons, and research and data on all immunological aspects of organ-, tissue- and (haematopoietic) stem cell transplantation are of potential interest to the readers of Transplant Immunology. Original papers, Review articles and Hypotheses will be considered for publication and submitted manuscripts will be rapidly peer-reviewed and published. They will be judged on the basis of scientific merit, originality, timeliness and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信