Fertility patterns in Pakistan: a comparative analysis of family planning trends across different geographic regions.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.22605/RRH8835
Noor Ullah Khan, Nida Asif, Itrat Zehrh, Gopika Mg, Sameen Arshad, Mah I Kan Changez
{"title":"Fertility patterns in Pakistan: a comparative analysis of family planning trends across different geographic regions.","authors":"Noor Ullah Khan, Nida Asif, Itrat Zehrh, Gopika Mg, Sameen Arshad, Mah I Kan Changez","doi":"10.22605/RRH8835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family planning includes a wide range of services, such as counseling, contraception, and support to couples. Evidence shows that developing countries have a high degree of inequality in contraception use and prevalence. Reasons for these inequalities include cultural barriers such as traditional preferences and a desire for larger families and lineage, especially in rural areas. The primary objective of this research was to examine the updated contraceptive method preferences of couples in rural and urban regions of Pakistan and how these translate to family planning practices among the different provinces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary survey analysis using the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2019 survey data was conducted. The dataset included 15 143 women sampled proportionally from the provinces, including Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The unit of analysis was 'women' from the individual survey dataset. Age, type of residence (rural, urban), division, education level, and language were used to evaluate access to family planning and contraception services. The c2 test assessed the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to see the likelihood of contraceptive use among women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the women in the sample, 55% were from rural areas and 50% were without formal education; 51.7% of these women were using or practicing any form of contraception method. The most common method used was condoms (9.2%), followed by injectables (6.2%). Regression analysis showed that women aged 15-19 years were less likely (odds ratio (OR)=0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.51-1.01) to use contraception when compared to the reference group. The likelihood of contraceptive use was higher in urban areas (OR=1.53, 95%Cl=1.39-1.69). Noticeably, contraceptive use was less likely in uneducated women (OR=0.62, 95%Cl=0.56-070). Punjab province had the highest contraceptive prevalence (34.3%), whereas Baluchistan had the lowest (6.9%). The use of contraception in urban and rural populations was similar in all provinces except Sindh and Gilgit Baltistan. In urban and rural areas, women in the age group 30-35 years who use contraception show a prevalence of 21% and 22% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights suboptimal use of contraceptives and the existence of high levels of inequalities among the regions. There is a need for the implementation of focused educational initiatives and counseling interventions along with prioritization of accessibility and affordability of contraceptive methods among women in lower socioeconomic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 3","pages":"8835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family planning includes a wide range of services, such as counseling, contraception, and support to couples. Evidence shows that developing countries have a high degree of inequality in contraception use and prevalence. Reasons for these inequalities include cultural barriers such as traditional preferences and a desire for larger families and lineage, especially in rural areas. The primary objective of this research was to examine the updated contraceptive method preferences of couples in rural and urban regions of Pakistan and how these translate to family planning practices among the different provinces.

Methods: A secondary survey analysis using the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2019 survey data was conducted. The dataset included 15 143 women sampled proportionally from the provinces, including Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The unit of analysis was 'women' from the individual survey dataset. Age, type of residence (rural, urban), division, education level, and language were used to evaluate access to family planning and contraception services. The c2 test assessed the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to see the likelihood of contraceptive use among women.

Results: Of the women in the sample, 55% were from rural areas and 50% were without formal education; 51.7% of these women were using or practicing any form of contraception method. The most common method used was condoms (9.2%), followed by injectables (6.2%). Regression analysis showed that women aged 15-19 years were less likely (odds ratio (OR)=0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.51-1.01) to use contraception when compared to the reference group. The likelihood of contraceptive use was higher in urban areas (OR=1.53, 95%Cl=1.39-1.69). Noticeably, contraceptive use was less likely in uneducated women (OR=0.62, 95%Cl=0.56-070). Punjab province had the highest contraceptive prevalence (34.3%), whereas Baluchistan had the lowest (6.9%). The use of contraception in urban and rural populations was similar in all provinces except Sindh and Gilgit Baltistan. In urban and rural areas, women in the age group 30-35 years who use contraception show a prevalence of 21% and 22% respectively.

Conclusion: The study highlights suboptimal use of contraceptives and the existence of high levels of inequalities among the regions. There is a need for the implementation of focused educational initiatives and counseling interventions along with prioritization of accessibility and affordability of contraceptive methods among women in lower socioeconomic regions.

巴基斯坦的生育模式:不同地理区域计划生育趋势的比较分析。
导言:计划生育包括一系列广泛的服务,如咨询、避孕和对夫妇的支持。有证据表明,发展中国家在避孕药具的使用和普及方面存在严重的不平等。造成这些不平等的原因包括文化障碍,如传统偏好、对大家庭和血统的渴望,尤其是在农村地区。本研究的主要目的是考察巴基斯坦农村和城市地区夫妇对最新避孕方法的偏好,以及这些偏好如何转化为不同省份的计划生育实践:利用 2019 年巴基斯坦人口与健康调查的调查数据进行了二次调查分析。数据集包括按比例从各省(包括吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦和阿扎德-查谟和克什米尔)抽取的 15 143 名妇女。分析单位为个人调查数据集中的 "妇女"。年龄、居住地类型(农村、城市)、分区、教育水平和语言被用来评估获得计划生育和避孕服务的情况。c2 检验用于评估因变量和自变量之间的关系。然后进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以了解妇女使用避孕药具的可能性:样本中 55% 的妇女来自农村地区,50% 的妇女未受过正规教育;其中 51.7% 的妇女正在使用或采取任何形式的避孕方法。最常用的方法是避孕套(9.2%),其次是注射避孕药(6.2%)。回归分析表明,与参照组相比,15-19 岁女性使用避孕药具的可能性较低(几率比(OR)=0.71,95% 置信区间(CI)=0.51-1.01)。在城市地区,使用避孕药具的可能性更高(OR=1.53,95%Cl=1.39-1.69)。值得注意的是,未受过教育的妇女使用避孕药具的可能性较低(OR=0.62,95%Cl=0.56-070)。旁遮普省的避孕普及率最高(34.3%),而俾路支省最低(6.9%)。除信德省和吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦省外,其他各省的城市和农村人口的避孕率都差不多。在城市和农村地区,30-35 岁年龄组妇女的避孕率分别为 21%和 22%:这项研究强调了避孕药具的次优使用情况以及各地区之间存在的严重不平等。有必要实施有针对性的教育举措和咨询干预措施,同时优先考虑社会经济地位较低地区妇女避孕方法的可及性和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信