Continuous Intra-Incisional Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Hip Nailing Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/2357709
Arash Farbood, Sanaz Abbasi, Naeimehossadat Asmarian, Mahsa Banifatemi, Vida Naderi-Boldaji, Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi
{"title":"Continuous Intra-Incisional Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Hip Nailing Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Arash Farbood, Sanaz Abbasi, Naeimehossadat Asmarian, Mahsa Banifatemi, Vida Naderi-Boldaji, Zeinabsadat Fattahi Saravi","doi":"10.1155/2024/2357709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration (CWI) as a postoperative pain-control technique has been shown in many surgical procedures. This study investigates the effect of CWI of local anesthetic on postoperative pain control in intertrochanteric fracture patients undergoing hip nailing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 48 patients who were scheduled for hip nailing surgery were randomly assigned to receive (<i>n</i> = 24) or not receive (<i>n</i> = 24) bupivacaine infusion through a catheter inside the surgical wound, postoperatively. Pain intensity (NRS), required dose of morphine, and drug-related complications within 24 hours of the intervention were assessed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain intensity was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group both during the recovery room stay and in the ward in the first 24 hours after the procedure (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In the recovery room, the control group patients had a higher morphine consumption compared to the bupivacaine group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and requested it earlier than the bupivacaine group (60 (45-60) vs. 360 (195-480) minutes) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In the ward, all control group patients used the PCA morphine pump, while only 54% of the bupivacaine group self-administered morphine through the pump, with a significantly lower total morphine consumption (1 (0-2) vs. 10 (5-14) mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001). None of the patients in the bupivacaine group required additional morphine, while 37.5% of the control requested additional morphine (<i>P</i>=0.002). Altogether, the control group had a higher total morphine consumption compared to the bupivacaine group in the first 24 hours (10.5 (6-15.5) vs. 1 (0-2) mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CWI of bupivacaine helps better pain reduction during the early postoperative hours while it reduces opioid consumption, minimizes nausea and vomiting, and improves patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"2357709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2357709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration (CWI) as a postoperative pain-control technique has been shown in many surgical procedures. This study investigates the effect of CWI of local anesthetic on postoperative pain control in intertrochanteric fracture patients undergoing hip nailing surgery.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 48 patients who were scheduled for hip nailing surgery were randomly assigned to receive (n = 24) or not receive (n = 24) bupivacaine infusion through a catheter inside the surgical wound, postoperatively. Pain intensity (NRS), required dose of morphine, and drug-related complications within 24 hours of the intervention were assessed and compared.

Results: Pain intensity was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group both during the recovery room stay and in the ward in the first 24 hours after the procedure (P < 0.001). In the recovery room, the control group patients had a higher morphine consumption compared to the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001) and requested it earlier than the bupivacaine group (60 (45-60) vs. 360 (195-480) minutes) (P < 0.001). In the ward, all control group patients used the PCA morphine pump, while only 54% of the bupivacaine group self-administered morphine through the pump, with a significantly lower total morphine consumption (1 (0-2) vs. 10 (5-14) mg, P < 0.001). None of the patients in the bupivacaine group required additional morphine, while 37.5% of the control requested additional morphine (P=0.002). Altogether, the control group had a higher total morphine consumption compared to the bupivacaine group in the first 24 hours (10.5 (6-15.5) vs. 1 (0-2) mg, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: CWI of bupivacaine helps better pain reduction during the early postoperative hours while it reduces opioid consumption, minimizes nausea and vomiting, and improves patient satisfaction.

髋关节置钉手术后持续椎管内布比卡因术后镇痛:随机临床试验。
背景:连续伤口浸润(CWI)作为一种术后疼痛控制技术的有效性已在许多外科手术中得到证实。本研究探讨了局麻药 CWI 对接受髋关节钉手术的转子间骨折患者术后疼痛控制的影响:在这项随机临床试验中,48 名计划接受髋关节钉手术的患者被随机分配到接受(24 人)或不接受(24 人)术后通过手术伤口内的导管输注布比卡因。对干预后 24 小时内的疼痛强度(NRS)、所需吗啡剂量和药物相关并发症进行了评估和比较:结果:布比卡因组在术后 24 小时内,无论是在恢复室还是在病房,疼痛强度都明显降低(P < 0.001)。在恢复室,对照组患者的吗啡消耗量高于布比卡因组(P<0.001),并且比布比卡因组更早要求使用吗啡(60(45-60)分钟对 360(195-480)分钟)(P<0.001)。在病房中,所有对照组患者都使用了 PCA 吗啡泵,而布比卡因组仅有 54% 的患者通过吗啡泵自行注射吗啡,吗啡总用量显著较低(1(0-2)毫克 vs 10(5-14)毫克,P < 0.001)。布比卡因组没有一名患者需要额外使用吗啡,而对照组则有 37.5% 的患者需要额外使用吗啡(P=0.002)。总之,与布比卡因组相比,对照组在头24小时的吗啡总用量更高(10.5(6-15.5)毫克 vs. 1(0-2)毫克,P < 0.001):布比卡因的CWI有助于在术后早期更好地减轻疼痛,同时减少阿片类药物的用量,最大限度地减少恶心和呕吐,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信