Role of Shear Wave Elastography for Assessment of Renal-Allograft Fibrosis and its Correlation With Histopathology

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Surojit Ruidas MBBS, MD, Hira Lal MBBS, MD, Raghunandan Prasad MBBS, MD, Srishti Sharma MBBS, MD, Surabhi Agarwal MBBS, MD, Ranvijai Singh MBBS, MD, Narayan Prasad MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology), Manas Ranjan Patel MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology), Ravi Shankar Kushwaha MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology), Manoj Jain MBBS, MD
{"title":"Role of Shear Wave Elastography for Assessment of Renal-Allograft Fibrosis and its Correlation With Histopathology","authors":"Surojit Ruidas MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Hira Lal MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Raghunandan Prasad MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Srishti Sharma MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Surabhi Agarwal MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Ranvijai Singh MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Narayan Prasad MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology),&nbsp;Manas Ranjan Patel MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology),&nbsp;Ravi Shankar Kushwaha MBBS, MD, DM (Nephrology),&nbsp;Manoj Jain MBBS, MD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether shear wave elastography (SWE) can accurately identify interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) in chronic renal allograft injury (CRAI) and whether it can differentiate between different grades of IFTA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective observational study on renal transplant recipients who presented with CRAI. Patient selection was done on the basis of clinical presentation, serum creatinine, and eGFR levels. Biopsy and SWE were performed and SWE values were correlated with histopathological findings according to Banff schema. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was also analyzed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of SWE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sxity-one patients were evaluated. Ten patients had no IFTA, 33 patients had mild IFTA, 16 patients had moderate IFTA, and 2 patients had severe IFTA. Mean parenchymal stiffness values in no IFTA, mild IFTA, moderate IFTA and severe IFTA were 39.86 ± 2.17 kPa (3.64 ± 0.09 m/s), 41.59 ± 3.36 kPa (3.71 ± 0.15 m/s), 47.59 ± 3.34 kPa (3.98 ± 0.14 m/s), and 53.83 ± 1.41 kPa (4.25 ± 0.03 m/s), respectively. SWE values of parenchymal stiffness reached statistical significance to differentiate between mild, moderate, and severe IFTA. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 45.09 kPa (3.89 m/s) to differentiate between mild IFTA and moderate IFTA, 52.06 kPa (4.18 m/s) to differentiate between moderate IFTA and severe IFTA with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SWE is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging tool to evaluate the disease status of renal allografts affected by CRAI. Thus, it can be of paramount importance if added to the regular follow-up imaging protocol of renal allograft along with grayscale and Doppler imaging.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"43 10","pages":"1979-1992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether shear wave elastography (SWE) can accurately identify interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) in chronic renal allograft injury (CRAI) and whether it can differentiate between different grades of IFTA.

Materials and Methods

Prospective observational study on renal transplant recipients who presented with CRAI. Patient selection was done on the basis of clinical presentation, serum creatinine, and eGFR levels. Biopsy and SWE were performed and SWE values were correlated with histopathological findings according to Banff schema. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was also analyzed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of SWE.

Results

Sxity-one patients were evaluated. Ten patients had no IFTA, 33 patients had mild IFTA, 16 patients had moderate IFTA, and 2 patients had severe IFTA. Mean parenchymal stiffness values in no IFTA, mild IFTA, moderate IFTA and severe IFTA were 39.86 ± 2.17 kPa (3.64 ± 0.09 m/s), 41.59 ± 3.36 kPa (3.71 ± 0.15 m/s), 47.59 ± 3.34 kPa (3.98 ± 0.14 m/s), and 53.83 ± 1.41 kPa (4.25 ± 0.03 m/s), respectively. SWE values of parenchymal stiffness reached statistical significance to differentiate between mild, moderate, and severe IFTA. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 45.09 kPa (3.89 m/s) to differentiate between mild IFTA and moderate IFTA, 52.06 kPa (4.18 m/s) to differentiate between moderate IFTA and severe IFTA with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

SWE is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging tool to evaluate the disease status of renal allografts affected by CRAI. Thus, it can be of paramount importance if added to the regular follow-up imaging protocol of renal allograft along with grayscale and Doppler imaging.

剪切波弹性成像在评估肾移植纤维化中的作用及其与组织病理学的相关性
目的研究剪切波弹性成像(SWE)能否准确识别慢性肾移植损伤(CRAI)中的间质纤维化和肾小管萎缩(IFTA),以及能否区分不同等级的IFTA:对出现 CRAI 的肾移植受者进行前瞻性观察研究。根据临床表现、血清肌酐和 eGFR 水平选择患者。对患者进行活检和SWE检查,并根据班夫模式将SWE值与组织病理学结果进行相关分析。此外,还分析了接收者操作特征(ROC),以评估 SWE 的诊断效果:共评估了 21 例患者。10例患者无IFTA,33例患者有轻度IFTA,16例患者有中度IFTA,2例患者有重度IFTA。无 IFTA、轻度 IFTA、中度 IFTA 和重度 IFTA 的实质僵硬度平均值分别为 39.86 ± 2.17 kPa(3.64 ± 0.09 m/s)、41.59 ± 3.36 kPa(3.71 ± 0.15 m/s)、47.59 ± 3.34 kPa(3.98 ± 0.14 m/s)和 53.83 ± 1.41 kPa(4.25 ± 0.03 m/s)。实质僵硬度的 SWE 值在区分轻度、中度和重度 IFTA 方面具有统计学意义。ROC分析显示,45.09 kPa(3.89 m/s)的临界值可区分轻度IFTA和中度IFTA,52.06 kPa(4.18 m/s)的临界值可区分中度IFTA和重度IFTA,其敏感性和特异性均可接受:结论:SWE 是评估受 CRAI 影响的肾脏同种异体移植物疾病状态的一种无创、经济的成像工具。因此,如果将 SWE 与灰度和多普勒成像一起添加到肾脏同种异体移植的常规随访成像方案中,将具有极其重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信